Background Median overall survival for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma is 12 to 16 months. Olaratumab is a human anti–platelet-derived growth factor receptor α monoclonal antibody which has antitumour activity in human sarcoma xenografts. Methods We conducted an open-label phase 1b, randomised, phase 2 study of doxorubicin ± olaratumab in patients with unresectable/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. The phase 1b primary endpoint was safety; the phase 2 primary endpoint was progression-free survival using a two-sided alpha level of 0·2 and statistical power of 0·8. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01185964. Findings Fifteen patients were enrolled and treated with olaratumab+doxorubicin in the phase 1b portion; 133 patients were randomised (66 to olaratumab+doxorubicin; 67 to doxorubicin) in the phase 2 portion, 129 of whom (97%) received at least one dose of study treatment (64 olaratumab+doxorubicin; 65 doxorubicin). Median progression-free survival in phase 2 was 6·6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4·1–8·3) with olaratumab+doxorubicin and 4·1 months (95% CI, 2·8–5·4) with doxorubicin (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0·672; 95% CI, 0·442–1·021; p=0·0615). Median overall survival was 26·5 months (95% CI, 20·9–31·7) with olaratumab+doxorubicin and 14·7 months (95% CI, 9·2–17·1) with doxorubicin (stratified HR, 0·463; 95% CI, 0·301–0·710; p=0·0003). Adverse events more frequent with olaratumab+doxorubicin vs doxorubicin alone included neutropenia (38 [59%] vs 25 [39%]), mucositis (34 [53%] vs 23 [35%]), nausea (47 [73%] vs 34 [52%]), vomiting (29 [45%] vs 12 [19%]), and diarrhea (22 [34%] vs 15 [23%]). Febrile neutropenia of grade ≥3 was similar in both groups (olaratumab plus doxorubicin 8 (13%) vs doxorubicin 9 (14%). Interpretation This study of olaratumab with doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma met its predefined primary endpoint for progression-free survival and achieved a highly significant improvement of 11·8 months in median overall survival (P=0·0003; HR 0·46). Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

The primary objective was not met. The addition of bevacizumab to gemcitabine-erlotinib did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. PFS, however, was significantly longer in the bevacizumab group compared with placebo. No unexpected safety events were observed from adding bevacizumab to gemcitabine-erlotinib.

The use of chemotherapy is considered standard therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer that cannot be treated with radiotherapy and in those with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status. This approach is also accepted in patients with earlier stage disease, when combined with radiotherapy in those with nonresectable locally advanced disease, or in the preoperative setting. Randomised clinical studies and meta-analyses of the literature have confirmed the beneficial survival effect of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cisplatin and carboplatin have been successfully used with other drugs in a wide variety of well-established two-drug combinations while three-drug combinations are still under investigation. Cisplatin and carboplatin use is limited by toxicity and inherent resistance. These considerations have prompted research into new platinum agents, such as the trinuclear platinum agent BBR3464, the platinum complex ZD0473 and oxaliplatin. These compounds could be developed in combination with agents such as paclitaxel, gemcitabine or vinorelbine in patients with advanced and/or refractory solid tumours.

Purpose LY3022859 is an anti-TGFβRII IgG1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor-mediated signaling activation. The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine a phase II dose in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives were to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK). Methods LY3022859 was infused intravenously (IV) at 1.25 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks (Q2W) (cohort 1A) and at flat doses of 12.5 mg (cohort 1B) and 25 mg (cohort 2) over 3 hours Q2W. Results Fourteen patients were enrolled in cohorts 1A (n=2), 1B (n=5), and 2 (n=7). DLTs were experienced by both patients in cohort 1A (infusion-related reaction) and 2 patients in cohort 2 (cytokine release syndrome and infusion-related reaction). No MTD was determined. At the 25 mg dose level (cohort 2), after fifth infusion, LY3022859 had a short t1/2 (4.37–7.80 hours) and rapid clearance (CLss, 0.412 L/hr). Exposure increased 2-fold (from 28.5 μg·hr/mL to 60.2 μg·hr/mL) with increase in dose from 12.5 mg to 25 mg. No accumulation was observed after repeat administration. Conclusions The MTD for LY3022859 was not determined. Dose escalation beyond 25 mg was considered unsafe due to worsening symptoms (uncontrolled cytokine release) despite prophylaxis (corticosteroids, antihistamines).