No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Three southern USA forestry species, loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), were previously shown to be spectrally separable (83% accuracy) using data from a full-range spectroradiometer (400-2500 nm) acquired above tree canopies. This study focused on whether these same species are also separable using hyperspectral data acquired using the airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS). Stepwise discriminant techniques were used to reduce data dimensionality to a maximum of 10 spectral bands, followed by discriminant techniques to measure separability. Discriminatory variables were largely located in the visible and near-infrared regions of the spectrum. Cross-validation accuracies ranged from 65% (1 pixel radiance data) to as high as 85% (363 pixel radiance data), indicating that these species have strong potential to be classified accurately using hyperspectral data from air-or space-borne sensors.

This study explores the utility of small-footprint, discrete return lidar data in deriving important forest structural attributes with the primary objective of estimating plot-level mean tree height, dominant height, and volume of Eucalyptus grandis plantations. The secondary objectives of the study were related to investigating the effect of lidar point densities (1 point/m2, 3 points/m2, and 5 points/m2) on height and volume estimates. Tree tops were located by applying local maxima (LM) filtering to canopy height surfaces created at each density level, followed by buffering using circular polygons. Maximum and mean height values of the original lidar points falling within each tree polygon were used to generate lidar mean and dominant heights. Lidar mean value was superior to the maximum lidar value approach in estimating mean plot height (R2∼0.95; RMSE∼7%), while the maximum height approach resulted in superior estimates for dominant plot height (R2 ∼0.95; RMSE∼5%). These observations were similar across all lidar point density levels. Plot-level volume was calculated using approaches based on lidar-derived height variables and stems per hectare, as well as stand age. The level of association between estimated and observed volume was relatively high (R2=0.82—0.94) with non-significant differences among estimates at high lidar point densities and field observation. Nearly all estimates, however, exhibited negative biases and RMSE ranging in the order of 20—43%. Overall, the results of the study demonstrate the potential of lidar-based approaches for forest structural assessment in commercial plantations, even though further research is required on improving stems per hectare (SPHA) estimation.