Requirements for plant license renewal require the evaluation and management of time limited aging analyses for the period of extended operation. These include metal fatigue analyses, with additional consideration for the effects of the reactor water environment. Current license renewal requirements for evaluation of time limited aging analyses for fatigue have extended environmentally assisted fatigue (EAF) considerations to additional locations beyond the originally prescribed NUREG/CR-6260 locations. These requirements have resulted in implementation of a screening process to identify locations that are potentially more limiting for further evaluation of EAF. The screening process includes comparisons of fatigue locations within common bases, including consideration of applicable system transients, rigor of analysis methods, and material types. To date, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission has only accepted EAF screening evaluation results based on comparisons within similar material types. However, there are conditions under which a comparison of locations with different material types is valid. This paper presents a basis to compare locations having different material types, to potentially reduce the number of leading (“sentinel”) locations in EAF screening evaluations. The methodology is described through a systematic approach and basis to determine when locations are more limiting with respect to EAF when different material types are compared.
Thermal stratification can occur in pressurizer surge lines when flow rates are low and large temperature differences between the pressurizer fluid and reactor coolant loop fluid exist. NRC Bulletin 88-11 requires that utilities address this issue with respect to the licensing basis. Additionally, significant fatigue usage can develop due to insurges and outsurges from the pressurizer that occur when the temperature difference (ΔT) is large. An important aspect of the surge line fatigue analysis is determination of global pipe moment loads due to insurges, outsurges, and related stratification effects. The Westinghouse AP1000® plant surge line is designed to limit the global effects of stratification using a surge line geometry that is inclined more than that of the previous generation plants. However, this design provides unique challenges to the analytical solution in comparison to the mostly horizontal geometries in previous PWR designs. The main challenge is due to the location of the stratified fluid hot/cold interface. The horizontal geometry has historically allowed conservative (based on analytical testing) treatment of the stratified interface profile. The inclined geometry requires consideration of positional changes, as the stratified interface moves through the line due to flow changes. Because of this, iterative calculations were required to predict global piping moment loads through the transient histories based on the movement of the stratified interface. Software was developed to solve a series of correlative equations representing moment loads due to pipe temperatures and stratification ΔT within discretized portions of the surge line throughout each transient. The correlative equations, which are based on the matrix solution of piping analysis load cases, predict the global pipe moment loads to a high degree of precision. The surge line is also a significant location in the online fatigue monitoring program implemented at the sites. The complexity of the design analysis that is reflected in the monitoring model requires a more detailed accounting for the location of the stratification interface, the effect on prediction of moment loadings for controlling locations, and the effect on local stresses at the monitoring locations. This paper describes the approach used to address all of these factors in the design evaluation and subsequent fatigue monitoring application.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.