No abstract

Within the last couple of decades, advances in critical care medicine have led to increased survival of critically ill patients, as well as the discovery of notable, long-term health challenges in survivors and their loved ones. The terms post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and PICS-family (PICS-F) have been used in non-neurocritical care populations to characterize the cognitive, psychiatric, and physical sequelae associated with critical care hospitalization in survivors and their informal caregivers (e.g., family and friends who provide unpaid care). In this review, we first summarize the literature on the cognitive, psychiatric, and physical correlates of PICS and PICS-F in non-neurocritical patient populations and draw attention to their long-term negative health consequences. Next, keeping in mind the distinction between disease-related neurocognitive changes and those that are associated directly with the experience of a critical illness, we review the neuropsychological sequelae among patients with common neurocritical illnesses. We acknowledge the clinical factors contributing to the difficulty in studying PICS in the neurocritical care patient population, provide recommendations for future lines of research, and encourage collaboration among critical care physicians in all specialties to facilitate continuity of care and to help elucidate mechanism(s) of PICS and PICS-F in all critical illness survivors. Finally, we discuss the importance of early detection of PICS and PICS-F as an opportunity for multidisciplinary interventions to prevent and treat new neuropsychological deficits in the neurocritical care population.

No abstract

Stroke patients are monitored hourly by physicians and nurses in an attempt to better understand their physical state. To quantify the patients’ level of mobility, hourly movement (i.e. motor) assessment scores are performed, which can be taxing and time-consuming for nurses and physicians. In this paper, we attempt to find a correlation between patient motor scores and continuous accelerometer data recorded in subjects who are unilaterally impaired due to stroke. The accelerometers were placed on both upper and lower extremities of four severely unilaterally impaired patients and their movements were recorded continuously for 7 to 14 days. Features that incorporate movement smoothness, strength, and characteristic movement patterns were extracted from the accelerometers using time-frequency analysis. Support vector classifiers were trained with the extracted features to test the ability of the long term accelerometer recordings in predicting dependent and antigravity sides, and significantly above baseline performance was obtained in most instances ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$P < 0.05$ \end{document} ). Finally, a leave-one-subject-out approach was carried out to assess the generalizability of the proposed methodology, and above baseline performance was obtained in two out of the three tested subjects. The methodology presented in this paper provides a simple, yet effective approach to perform long term motor assessment in neurocritical care patients.

Prone positioning is one of the few interventions in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) which has a proven mortality reduction [1]. Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, severe ARDS cases have sharply increased worldwide, increasing the need for proning. Some centers have also encouraged non-intubated patients with hypoxemia due to COVID-19 to self-prone [2] Although generally considered low risk, pressure-related complications can occur during proning and differ from those that occur in supine patients. We present two cases of COVID-19-associated ARDS treated with prone positioning who developed meralgia paresthetica that was diagnosed in our ICU recovery clinic. Meralgia paresthetica (MP) results from compression injury of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve between the anterior superior iliac spine and the inguinal ligament (Fig. 1); this mononeuropathy results in sensory abnormalities in the anterolateral thigh [3]. To our knowledge, there is only one other reported case of MP in prone positioning for ARDS, although it has been reported after surgical prone positioning in up to 24% of cases [4, 5]. The first patient was a 53-year-old man with diabetes (well-controlled, glycosylated hemoglobin 6.5 to 7.0%), obesity (BMI 30.9), and hypertension, who was mechanically ventilated for 11 days. He had a single session of proning for 16 h. He was extubated and discharged home on day 19 of admission. During his ICU recovery clinic visit (2 months after discharge), he reported isolated left-sided, welldemarcated anterior thigh numbness, new since his hospital stay. He had no associated weakness or pain, though did also endorse some non-painful numbness and tingling in

Sleep is fundamental for everyday functioning, yet it is often negatively impacted in critically ill patients by the intensive care setting. With a focus on the neurological intensive care unit (NeuroICU), this narrative review summarizes methods of measuring sleep and addresses common causes of sleep disturbance in the hospital including environmental, pharmacological, and patient-related factors. The effects of sleep deprivation on the cardiovascular, pulmonary, immune, endocrine, and neuropsychological systems are discussed, with a focus on short-term deprivation in critically ill populations. Where evidence is lacking in the literature, long-term sleep deprivation studies and the effects of sleep deprivation in healthy individuals are also referenced. Lastly, strategies for the promotion of sleep in the NeuroICU are presented.

Considering the COVID-19 pandemic where concomitant occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe acute brain injury (sABI) has increasingly co-emerged, we synthesize existing data regarding the simultaneous management of both conditions. Our aim is to provide readers with fundamental principles and concepts for the management of sABI and ARDS, and highlight challenges and conflicts encountered while managing concurrent disease. Up to 40 percent of patients with sABI can develop ARDS. While there are trials and guidelines to support the mainstays of treatment for ARDS and sABI independently, guidance on concomitant management is limited. Treatment strategies aimed at managing severe ARDS may at times conflict with the management of sABI. In this narrative review, we discuss the physiological basis and risks involved during simultaneous management of ARDS and sABI, summarize evidence for treatment decisions, and demonstrate these principles using hypothetical case scenarios. Use of invasive or non-invasive monitoring to assess brain and lung physiology may facilitate goal-directed treatment strategies with the potential to improve outcome. Understanding the pathophysiology and key treatment concepts for co-management of these conditions is critical to optimizing care in this high-acuity patient population.

No abstract