REVIEWSimon Choat, Marx Through Post-Structuralism: Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze (London: Continuum, 2012), ISBN: 978-1-4411-8508-2Michel Foucault left hints as to Karl Marx's significance to himself and to his work. One recollects his put-down in The Order of Things: "Marxism exists in nineteenth century thought like a fish in water…unable to breathe anywhere else." 1 On the other hand, Foucault remarked once that he was prone to "quote Marx without saying so." 2 Potentially ambiguous, such mixed messages are for Foucault unproblematic: being "faithful or unfaithful" 3 to canonical authorial appropriation, a matter of supreme indifference.In Marx Through Post-Structuralism, Simon Choat details the intriguing relationship between Marx and four paragons of French post-structuralist thought: Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Jean-François Lyotard and Gilles Deleuze. Choat's thesis is that these men "pursue a materialist philosophy" (171). Simply put, the post-structuralists embrace the "good" Marx -alert to praxis; aleatory; deconstructionist -and cold shoulder the "bad" Marx -teleological; determinist; reductionist. More precisely, Choat argues that the post-structuralists are sympathetic to a critical materialist bent in Marxian thought, while rejecting idealist implications in Marxist theory. Whereas idealists posit the realisation of ultimate goals or ontologically-given proto-sources to justify their critique of social relations, critical materialists fixate on the concrete transformation of the social realm. Material relations are rejiggable endogenously. For the post-structuralists "certain dangers…in Marx's work" such as "the faith that the future can be pre-programmed or that critique can be grounded in the pure essence of some natural given" need exorcising or ignoring (92-93).Foucault's connexion with Marx is indicative of how post-structuralists have related, overtly or tacitly, to Marx. Synergies are palpable when Marx is at his most "antiteleological and non-totalizing" and "politically committed" (107), most interested in demonstrating that subjects are historically effected -Foucault and Marx had no truck with the eternal Cartesian cognito. For example, Choat highlights (119) how in Capital Marx delineates the making of the working-class, specifying its coming-to-be through dynamic capitalist regulation. This is akin to Foucault's celebrated account of penitential subject creation in Discipline and Punish.
Groh, Dieter. Negative Integration und revolutionärer Attentismus: Die deutsche Sozialdemokratie am Vorabend des Ersten Weltkrieges. Frankfurt am Main.: Ullstein, 1973. 783 pp. (hardcover). Matthias, Erich. Kautsky and der Kautskyanismus: Die Funktion der Ideologie in der deutschen Sozialdemokratie vor dem ersten Weltkriege. In Marxismusstudien, 2, hrsg. I. Fetscher, 151-197. Tübingen: Mohr, 1957. Steinberg, Hans-Josef. Sozialismus und deutsche Sozialdemokratie: Zur Ideologie der Partei vor dem 1. Weltkrieg. 5., erw. Aufl. Bonn: Dietz, 1979. xii + 174 pp. (hardcover).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.