Accumulating evidence strongly implicates angiotensin II (AngII) intracellular signaling in mediating cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis and restenosis after vascular injury. In vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), through its G-protein-coupled AngII Type 1 receptor (AT(1)), AngII activates various intracellular protein kinases, such as receptor or non-receptor tyrosine kinases, which includes epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), c-Src, PYK2, FAK, JAK2. In addition, AngII activates serine/threonine kinases such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, p70 S6 kinase, Akt/protein kinase B and various protein kinase C isoforms. In VSMCs, AngII also induces the generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), which play critical roles in activation and modulation of above signal transduction. Less is known about endothelial cell (EC) AngII signaling than VSMCs, however, recent studies suggest that endothelial AngII signaling negatively regulates the nitric oxide (NO) signaling pathway and thereby induces endothelial dysfunction. Moreover, in both VSMCs and ECs, AngII signaling cross-talk with insulin signaling might be involved in insulin resistance, an important risk factor in the development of cardiovascular diseases. In fact, clinical and pharmacological studies showed that AngII infusion induces insulin resistance and AngII converting enzyme inhibitors and AT(1) receptor blockers improve insulin sensitivity. In this review, we focus on the recent findings that suggest the existence of novel signaling mechanisms whereby AngII mediates processes, such as activation of receptor or non-receptor tyrosine kinases and ROS, as well as cross-talk between insulin and NO signal transduction in VSMCs and ECs.

Objectives Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disorder characterized histologically by tissue eosinophilia. Sialic acid–binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (Siglec-F) is a receptor highly expressed on mouse eosinophils and mediates eosinophilic apoptosis. We investigated whether administration of an anti-Siglec-F Ab would reduce esophageal eosinophilic inflammation and remodeling in a mouse model of egg ovalbumin (OVA)–induced EoE. Subjects and Methods Three groups of mice were studied (no OVA, OVA + anti-Siglec-F Ab, and OVA + isotype control Ab). Mice were sensitized intraperitoneally and then challenged chronically with intraesophageal OVA. Levels of esophageal eosinophils and features of remodeling (angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, deposition of fibronectin, basal zone hyperplasia, and fibrosis) were quantitated by immunohistochemistry and image analysis. Results Administration of an anti-Siglec-F Ab to OVA-challenged mice significantly reduced levels of esophageal eosinophils, down to levels noted in non-OVA-challenged mice. The anti-Siglec-F Ab also reduced features of OVA-induced remodeling, including angiogenesis, basal zone hyperplasia, and fibronectin deposition. The reduced angiogenesis in anti-Siglec-F Ab-treated mice was associated with reduced numbers of vascular endothelial growth factor–positive cells in the esophagus. The anti-Siglec-F antibody did not significantly reduce esophageal fibrosis as assessed by trichrome staining. Conclusions Administration of an anti-Siglec-F antibody significantly decreased the number of eosinophils in the esophagus in a mouse model of OVA-induced EoE. The reduction in eosinophilic inflammation was associated with a significant decrease in levels of angiogenesis, deposition of fibronectin, and basal zone hyperplasia. Studies in this pre-clinical model of EoE suggest that Siglec-F (and its human paralog Siglec-8) may be novel therapeutic targets to reduce eosinophilic inflammation in EoE.

Direct vasodilators and sympatholytic agents were some of the first antihypertensive medications discovered and utilized in the past century. However, side effect profiles and the advent of newer antihypertensive drug classes have reduced the use of these agents in recent decades. Outcome data and large randomized trials supporting the efficacy of these medications are limited; however, in general the blood pressure-lowering effect of these agents has repeatedly been shown to be comparable to other more contemporary drug classes. Nevertheless, a landmark hypertension trial found a negative outcome with a doxazosin-based regimen compared to a chlorthalidone-based regimen, leading to the removal of α-1 adrenergic receptor blockers as first-line monotherapy from the hypertension guidelines. In contemporary practice, direct vasodilators and sympatholytic agents, particularly hydralazine and clonidine, are often utilized in refractory hypertension. Hydralazine and minoxidil may also be useful alternatives for patients with renal dysfunction, and both hydralazine and methyldopa are considered first line for the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Hydralazine has also found widespread use for the treatment of systolic heart failure in combination with isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). The data to support use of this combination in African Americans with heart failure are particularly robust. Hydralazine with ISDN may also serve as an alternative for patients with an intolerance to angiotensin antagonists. Given these niche indications, vasodilators and sympatholytics are still useful in clinical practice; therefore, it is prudent to understand the existing data regarding efficacy and the safe use of these medications.

No abstract