Purpose: Molecular classification of breast cancer has been proposed based on gene expression profiles of human tumors. Luminal, basal-like, normal-like, and erbB2+ subgroups were identified and were shown to have different prognoses. The goal of this research was to determine if these different molecular subtypes of breast cancer also respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Experimental Design: Fine needle aspirations of 82 breast cancers were obtained before starting preoperative paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Gene expression profiling was done with Affymetrix U133A microarrays and the previously reported ''breast intrinsic''gene set was used for hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling to assign molecular class. Results: The basal-like and erbB2+ subgroups were associated with the highest rates of pathologic complete response (CR), 45% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 24-68] and 45% (95% CI, 23-68), respectively, whereas the luminal tumors had a pathologic CR rate of 6% (95% CI, 1-21). No pathologic CR was observed among the normal-like cancers (95% CI, 0-31). Molecular class was not independent of conventional cliniocopathologic predictors of response such as estrogen receptor status and nuclear grade. None of the 61genes associated with pathologic CR in the basal-like group were associated with pathologic CR in the erbB2+ group, suggesting that the molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy sensitivity may vary between these two estrogen receptor^negative subtypes. Conclusions: The basal-like and erbB2+ subtypes of breast cancer are more sensitive to paclitaxel-and doxorubicin-containing preoperative chemotherapy than the luminal and normallike cancers.Breast cancer is a clinically heterogeneous disease. Histologically similar tumors may have different prognoses and may respond to therapy differently. It is believed that these differences in clinical behavior are due to molecular differences between histologically similar tumors. DNA microarray technology is ideally suited to reveal such molecular differences. A novel molecular classification of breast cancer based on gene expression profiles was recently proposed (1). The investigators identified a set of stably expressed genes (''intrinsic gene set''; n = 534) that accounted for much of the molecular differences between 42 breast cancers and did hierarchical cluster analysis to identify subgroups of cancers with separate gene expression profiles. Luminal, basal-like, normal-like, and erbB2+ subgroups were identified and were shown to have different prognoses (1 -4). These results were confirmed in follow-up experiments by the same group and others using larger numbers of cases. The basal-like (mostly estrogen receptor negative) and erbB2+ (mostly HER-2 amplified and estrogen receptor negative) subgroups had the shortest relapse-free and overall survival, whereas the luminal-type (estrogen receptorpositive) tumors had a more favorable clinical outcome (2 -4).

The HER-2/neu oncogene encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to the epidermal growth factor receptor. In this review, the association of HER-2/neu gene and protein abnormalities with prognosis and response to therapy with trastuzumab and to other therapies in breast cancer is presented. By considering a series of 80 published studies encompassing more than 25,000 patients, the relative advantages and disadvantages of Southern blotting, polymerase chain reaction amplification, andThe Oncologist 2003;8:307-325 www.TheOncologist.comCorrespondence: Jeffrey S. Ross, M.D., Albany Medical College, Department of Pathology, Mail Code 81, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Telephone: 518-262-5461; Fax: 518-262-8092; e-mail: rossj@mail.amc.edu Received February 5, 2003; accepted for publication April 28, 2003. ©AlphaMed Press 1083-7159/2003 The Oncologist ® LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter completing this course, the reader will be able to:1. Define the historical background and biological basis of the discovery of the HER-2/neu gene and its first use as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.2. Recall the uses of HER-2/neu testing prior to the approval of trastuzumab including the impact on anthracycline adjuvant and first-line chemotherapy responses.3. Explain the basic principles of all the HER-2/neu tests in clinical practice: IHC, FISH, Southern blot, PCR, tissue ELISA, and serum ELISA.4. Contrast the pros and cons and uses and limitations of the IHC versus the FISH approach to HER-2/neu testing.5. Critique the most recent data comparing IHC with FISH for the prediction of response to single-agent trastuzumab and trastuzumab in combination with standard chemotherapy for advanced metastatic breast cancer.6. Describe the HER-2/neu expression patterns in all types of breast conditions, including in situ carcinoma, lobular versus ductal carcinoma, Paget's disease, male breast cancer, breast sarcomas, and benign breast disorders.Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com CME CME This material is protected by U.S. Copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. For reprints contact: Reprints@AlphaMedPress.com Ross, Fletcher, Linette et al. 308 HER-2/NEU GENE (C-ERBB-2)The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)/neu (c-erbB-2) gene is localized to chromosome 17q and encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor protein that is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or HER family ( Fig. 1) [1]. This family of receptors is involved in cell-to-cell and cell-to-stroma communication primarily through a process known as signal transduction, in which external growth factors, or ligands, affect the transcription of various genes by phosphorylating or dephosphorylating a series of transmembrane proteins and intracellular signaling intermediates, many of which possess enzymatic activity. Signal propagation occurs as the enzymatic activity of one protein turns on the enzymat...

Breast cancers show variable sensitivity to paclitaxel. There is no diagnostic test to identify tumors that are sensitive to this drug. We used U133A chips to identify genes that are associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) to preoperative paclitaxelcontaining chemotherapy in stage I-III breast cancer (n ‫؍‬ 82). Tau was the most differentially expressed gene. Tumors with pCR had significantly lower (P < 0.3 ؋ 10 ؊5 ) mRNA expression. Tissue arrays from 122 independent but similarly treated patients were used for validation by immunohistochemistry. Seventy-four percent of pCR cases were tau protein negative; the odds ratio for pCR was 3.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.6 -8.6; P ϭ 0.0013). In multivariate analysis, nuclear grade (P < 0.01), age <50 (P ϭ 0.03), and taunegative status (P ϭ 0.04) were independent predictors of pCR. Small interfering RNA experiments were performed to examine whether down-regulation of tau increases sensitivity to chemotherapy in vitro. Down-regulation of tau increased sensitivity of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel but not to epirubicin. Tubulin polymerization assay was used to assess whether tau modulates binding of paclitaxel to tubulin. Preincubation of tubulin with tau resulted in decreased paclitaxel binding and reduced paclitaxelinduced microtubule polymerization. These data suggest that low tau expression renders microtubules more vulnerable to paclitaxel and makes breast cancer cells hypersensitive to this drug. Low tau expression may be used as a marker to select patients for paclitaxel therapy. Inhibition of tau function might be exploited as a therapeutic strategy to increase sensitivity to paclitaxel. adjuvant therapy ͉ drug resistance

Our results suggest that transcriptional profiling has the potential to identify a gene expression pattern in breast cancer that may lead to clinically useful predictors of pCR to T/FAC neoadjuvant therapy.

Background-Fibrinogen has been identified as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Also, the role of elevated fibrinogen in thrombosis suggests that it may be on the causal pathway for certain risk factors to exert their effect. These associations remain incompletely characterized. Moreover, the optimal fibrinogen assay for risk stratification is uncertain. Methods and Results-In 2632 subjects from cycle 5 of the Framingham Offspring Population, fibrinogen levels were determined with a newly developed immunoprecipitation test (American Biogenetic Sciences) and the functional Clauss method. With the immunoprecipitation method, there were significant linear trends across fibrinogen tertiles (PϽ0.001) for age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides in men and women. The Clauss method had significant results (PϽ0.030), except for triglycerides in men. Fibrinogen levels were higher for those with compared with those without cardiovascular disease. After covariate adjustment, fibrinogen remained significantly higher in those with cardiovascular disease with the use of the immunoprecipitation test (Pϭ0.035 and Pϭ0.018 for men and women, respectively) but not with the Clauss method. Conclusions-Fibrinogen was associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Elevation of fibrinogen may provide a mechanism for risk factors to exert their effect. Also, fibrinogen levels were higher among subjects with cardiovascular disease compared with those without disease. The immunoprecipitation test showed a stronger association with cardiovascular disease than the Clauss method, suggesting that it may be a useful screening tool to identify individuals at increased thrombotic risk.

SummaryBortezomib (formerly PS-341) has significant activity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), its efficacy is increased with the addition of dexamethasone and it demonstrates synergy with doxorubicin, thus providing the rationale for combination therapy with bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD). Patients with untreated MM received four 21-d cycles of PAD, comprising bortezomib 1AE3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, along with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, 8-11 and 15-18 during cycle 1 and days 1-4 during cycles 2-4. During days 1-4, patients also received 0, 4AE5 or 9 mg/m 2 of doxorubicin at dose levels 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Following peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection, patients received high-dose melphalan (MEL200) with PBSC transplantation (PBSCT). After PAD induction alone, 20 of 21 patients (95%) achieved at least a partial response (PR), including complete response (CR) in five patients (24%). Twenty of 21 had PBSC mobilized, and 18 of 20 received MEL200/PBSCT. In an intention-to-treat analysis, response rates were: CR 43%, near CR 14%, very good PR 24%, PR 14% and stable disease 5%. PAD was effective, did not prejudice subsequent PBSC collection, and should be further evaluated in prospective randomized trials.

BACKGROUNDGene expression profiling should be applicable to needle biopsy samples if microarray technology is to become practically useful for clinical research or management of breast carcinoma. This study compared gene expression profiles derived from fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and from core needle biopsy (CBX).METHODSTotal RNA was extracted from single FNAB and CBX samples. Corresponding pairs of FNAB and CBX were analyzed for similarity of gene expression profiles using cDNA microarrays that contain 30,721 human sequences. A subset of genes that distinguished CBX samples from FNAB samples was evaluated in a larger group of needle biopsy samples and in a published genomic database derived from 78 sporadic breast carcinomas with known clinical outcome.RESULTSSixty‐eight patients with newly diagnosed breast carcinoma were included in the current study. Sixty‐five patients underwent FNAB (17 had both FNAB and CBX) and 3 underwent CBX only. Extracted RNA was of suitable quality for hybridization in 46 (71%) FNABs and 15 (75%) CBXs. Total RNA yield in those samples was similar for single‐pass FNAB (mean = 3.6 μg and median = 2.2 μg; n = 46) and CBX (mean = 2.8 μg and median = 2.0 μg; n = 15), with 1 μg or more of total RNA in all cases. Transcriptional profiling was performed successfully in all cases when it was attempted, in a total of 50 samples (38 FNABs and 12 CBXs), including matched FNAB and CBX samples from 10 patients. There were differences in gene expression profiles in 10 matched FNAB and CBX sample pairs. Genes that were expressed differently in CBX samples, compared with FNAB samples, were recognized as being predominantly from the endothelium, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts or smooth muscle, and histiocytes. Corresponding microscopic cell counts from FNABs demonstrated means of 80% tumor cells, 15% lymphocytes, and 5% stromal cells, whereas CBXs contained 50% tumor cells, 20% lymphocytes, and 30% stromal cells. Considering that CBXs are approximately six‐fold richer in nonlymphoid stromal cells than FNABs and that CBXs differentially express a set of recognized stromal genes, the authors used these biopsies to define a transcriptional profile of breast carcinoma stroma. A set of 120 genes differentially expressed in CBXs was assessed independently in a published breast carcinoma genomic database to classify breast carcinomas based on stromal gene expression. Subgroups of tumors with low or high stromal signal were identified, but there was no correlation with the development of systemic metastases within 5 years.CONCLUSIONSBoth FNAB and CBX yield a similar quality and quantity of total RNA and are suitable for cDNA microarray analyses in approximately 70–75% of single‐pass samples. Transcriptional profiles from FNAB and CBX of the same tumor generally are similar and are driven by the tumor cell population. The authors concluded that each technique has relative advantages. The FNABs provide transcriptional profiles that are a purer representation of the tumor cell population, whereas transcriptional profiles from CBXs include more repre sentation from nonlymphoid stromal elements. Selection of the preferred needle biopsy sampling technique for genomic studies of breast carcinomas should depend on whether variable stromal gene expression is desirable in the samples. Cancer 2003;97:2960–71. © 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11435

The testing of newly diagnosed breast cancer specimens for HER-2/neu status has achieved "standard of practice" status for the management of breast cancer in the United States. The discussion as to the best method to determine HER-2/neu status in these samples continues, with the fluorescence in situ hybridization method gaining popularity owing to the recent evidence that it, in comparison with immunohistochemical analysis, might more accurately predict clinical responses to trastuzumab-based therapies. With trastuzumab achieving excellent results in the treatment of HER-2/neu-positive advanced disease and under extensive evaluation in major clinical trials for its potential efficacy when used at earlier clinical stages, the potential role(s) for HER-2/neu testing as a predictor of response to other therapies being resolved by large prospective clinical outcome studies, and the more convenient gene-based chromogenic in situ hybridization technique "waiting in the wings," the saga of HER-2/neu testing in breast cancer will continue to unfold over the next several years.