This study used computed tomography (CT) imaging to determine in vivo mass, center of mass (CM), and moments of inertia (Icm) about the CM of discrete segments of the human torso. Four subjects, two males and two females, underwent serial transverse CT scans that were collected at 1-cm intervals for the full length of the trunk. The pixel intensity values of transverse images were correlated to tissue densities, thereby allowing trunk section mass properties to be calculated. The percentage of body mass observed by vertebral levels ranged from 1.1% at T1 to 2.6% at L5. The masses of the upper, middle, and lower trunk segments as percentages of body mass were estimated to be 18.5, 12.2, and 10.7%, respectively. The whole trunk mass was estimated to comprise 41.6% of the total body mass. Transverse vertebral CM values were found to lie anterior to their respective vertebral centroids by up to 5.0 cm in the lower thoracic region. For the upper, middle, and lower trunk segments, the average CM positions were found to be 25.9, 62.5, and 86.9% of the distance from the superior to inferior ends of the trunk. The upper and middle trunk CMs corresponded to approximately 4.0 cm anterior to T7/T8 vertebral centroid levels and 1.0 cm anterior to L3/L4 vertebral centroid levels, respectively. For the whole trunk, the CM was 52.7% of the distance from the xiphoid process and approximately 2.0 cm anterior to L1/L2 vertebral centroid levels. Variations in CM and Icm values were observed between subject, but these were within the range of previous reports of body segment parameters. Differences from previous studies were attributable to variations in boundary definitions, measurement techniques, population groups, and body states (live versus cadaver) examined. The disparity between previous findings and findings of this study emphasizes the need to better define the segmental properties of the trunk so that improved biomechanical representation of the body can be achieved.

No abstract

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the segmental parameters of the human trunk of males in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, the efficacy of volumetric estimation and existing prediction formulas to produce segmental properties similar to those produced by MRI was evaluated. As opposed to finding one representative normal value for these parameters, a range of normal values was defined. For instance, the average trunk mass was 42.2% +/- 3.5% (x +/- SD) of body mass, but values ranged from 35.8% to 48.0%. To account for segment parameters more accurately, specific anthropometric measures need to be considered in addition to overall measures of body height and mass. These specific measures included segment length, circumference, width, and depth. Studies reporting general percentages based on height and/or mass were found to be inadequate predictors of segmental parameters of the trunk compared with MRI estimates. Volume-based estimates, which assume a uniform density distribution within a segment, were found to correspond closely to MRI values except for the thorax. However, the use of density values reflective of the living in vivo state would likely alleviate this disparity, thus indicating that the volumetric technique may be effective for deriving segmental parameters for large segments of the trunk. Future research should adopt noninvasive techniques such as MRI and/or volumetric estimation to enhance the predictability of segmental parameters of the body for specific population groups characterized by gender, developmental age, body type, and fitness level. Further efforts should be made to establish standardized boundary definitions for trunk segments to avoid unnecessary confusion, from which substantial errors may be introduced into biomechanical linked-segment analyses of human movement.

No abstract

The premise behind most noninvasive techniques for the measurement of scoliotic conditions of the spine is that the lateral distortion of the spine relates directly to transverse rib cage deformity within the transverse plane. The focus of this study was to examine this assumption by comparing different noninvasive methods for the assessment of scoliotic curves. The three techniques examined were (1) use of the Scoliometer (SCOL), (2) use of the back-contour device (BCD), and (3) use of moiré topographic imaging (MTI). Fourteen subjects (10 female, 4 male) with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis were measured. Posterior-anterior radiographs were obtained for the clinical assessment of all subjects and were subsequently used to determine Cobb angles. Significant correlations between axial trunk rotation and Cobb-angle measurements were observed in the thoracic region (MTI, r = .80, df = 10, P less than .005; BCD, r = .70, df = 10, P less than .025; SCOL, r = .59, df = 10, P less than .025) but were not found within the lumbar region (MTI, r = .42; BCD, r = .17; SCOL, r = .20). Factors other than trunk deformity, such as the posture assumed by the subject during measurement, may have influenced axial trunk rotation. Hence, the techniques appear to provide valid estimations of lateral curvature of the spine in the thoracic region of the trunk but not the lumbar region. The results suggest that the measurement techniques cannot be used interchangeably in clinical recording.

regnancy-related changes in joint laxity were first documented in 1934 by Abramson et a1 (1) for the pubic symphysis. In an in vivo radiographic study of the pelvis of pregnant women, these authors measured widening of the symphysis of up to 12 mm during pregnancy. Joint laxity was thought to primarily affect the pelvic joints (sacroiliac joints and pubic symphysis) to ease parturition, but, more recently, evidence of an increase in laxity of peripheral joints has been reported.Calguneri et al (5) measured passive extension of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index finger in a group of 68 women. They found a significant decrease in the range of m e tion of this joint postpartum (5-25 weeks) compared with values obtained during pregnancy (24-40 weeks).Block et al (4) studied changes in the foot from the eighth week of pregnancy to the &week postpartum period in a pilot study of 13 participants. They demonstrated increased range of motion in subtalar and first metatarsophalangeal foot joints (measured with a tractograph) .Finally. Ostgaard et al (10) considered increased joint laxity as a potential risk factor for back pain because of the instability that may be created in the sacroiliac joints. They measured passive ulnar deviation of the fourth finger of over 800 pregnant women. They found no relation between back pain and finger laxity except in the group of women in their first pregnancy. In that group, Pregnancy-related increase in ligament laxity may cause joint instability. The purpose of this study was two-fold: 1) to assess knee laxity changes during pregnancy and 2) to evaluate the effect of exercise on knee laxity due to a typical prenatal fitness program. The subjects were healthy pregnant women. One group (N = 27) participated in exercise classes designed according to national guidelines. The second group (N = 38) was more sedentary. A clinical arthrometer, KT-1000, was used, and anterior and posterior drawer tests were performed. The results were added and averaged for the two knees. laxity was constant in the second half of pregnancy and had significantly decreased by 14% 4 months afier birth. No influence of parity or exercise was detected. The exercise program employing minimal to moderate weight bearing did not result in any measurable increases in knee laxity and, therefore, appears to be appropriate with regard to knee stability. These results should not, however, be extended to different types of exercise programs without additional research.

No abstract