No abstract

Importance: The rapidly expanding 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) has challenged the medical community to an unprecedented degree. Physicians and healthcare workers are at added risk of exposure and infection during the course of the patient care. Due to the rapid spread of this disease through respiratory droplets, healthcare providers such as otolaryngologists-head & neck surgeons who come in close contact with the upper aerodigestive tract during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are particularly at risk. Here we present a set of safety recommendations based on our review of literature and communications with physicians with first-hand knowledge of safety procedures during the 2019 COVID-19 pandemic.Observations: A high number of healthcare providers were infected during the first phase of the pandemic in Wuhan province. Subsequently, by adopting strict safety precautions, other regions were able to achieve high levels of safety for healthcare providers without jeopardizing the care of patients. We reviewed the most common procedures related to the examination and treatment of upper aerodigestive tract diseases. Each category was reviewed based on the potential risk imposed to healthcare workers. Specific recommendations were made, based on the literature, when available, or consensus best practices. Specific safety recommendations were made for performing tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Preserving highly skilled healthcare work force is a top priority for any community and healthcare system. Based on the experience of healthcare systems in Asia and Europe, by following strict safety guidelines, the risk of exposure and infection of healthcare providers could be significantly reduced, while providing high levels of care. The provided recommendations could be used as broad guidance for all healthcare workers who are involved with the care of COVID-19 patients.

SummaryBackgroundRemote ischaemic conditioning with transient ischaemia and reperfusion applied to the arm has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We investigated whether remote ischaemic conditioning could reduce the incidence of cardiac death and hospitalisation for heart failure at 12 months.MethodsWe did an international investigator-initiated, prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI) at 33 centres across the UK, Denmark, Spain, and Serbia. Patients (age >18 years) with suspected STEMI and who were eligible for PPCI were randomly allocated (1:1, stratified by centre with a permuted block method) to receive standard treatment (including a sham simulated remote ischaemic conditioning intervention at UK sites only) or remote ischaemic conditioning treatment (intermittent ischaemia and reperfusion applied to the arm through four cycles of 5-min inflation and 5-min deflation of an automated cuff device) before PPCI. Investigators responsible for data collection and outcome assessment were masked to treatment allocation. The primary combined endpoint was cardiac death or hospitalisation for heart failure at 12 months in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02342522) and is completed.FindingsBetween Nov 6, 2013, and March 31, 2018, 5401 patients were randomly allocated to either the control group (n=2701) or the remote ischaemic conditioning group (n=2700). After exclusion of patients upon hospital arrival or loss to follow-up, 2569 patients in the control group and 2546 in the intervention group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 12 months post-PPCI, the Kaplan-Meier-estimated frequencies of cardiac death or hospitalisation for heart failure (the primary endpoint) were 220 (8·6%) patients in the control group and 239 (9·4%) in the remote ischaemic conditioning group (hazard ratio 1·10 [95% CI 0·91–1·32], p=0·32 for intervention versus control). No important unexpected adverse events or side effects of remote ischaemic conditioning were observed.InterpretationRemote ischaemic conditioning does not improve clinical outcomes (cardiac death or hospitalisation for heart failure) at 12 months in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI.FundingBritish Heart Foundation, University College London Hospitals/University College London Biomedical Research Centre, Danish Innovation Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, TrygFonden.

No abstract

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a malignancy that arises from epidermal keratinocytes. Although the majority of cutaneous SCC cases are easily treated without further complication, some behave more aggressively and carry a poor prognosis. These "high-risk" cutaneous SCCs commonly originate in the head and neck and have an increased tendency toward recurrence, local invasion, and distant metastasis. Factors for high-risk cutaneous SCC include large size (>2 cm), a deeply invasive lesion (>2 mm), incomplete excision, high-grade/desmoplastic lesions, perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion, immunosuppression, and high-risk anatomic locations. Both the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN ) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) identify several of these high-risk features of cutaneous SCC. The purpose of this article was to review the high-risk features included in these guidelines, as well as their notable discrepancies and omissions. We also provide a brief overview of current prophylactic measures, surgical options, and adjuvant therapies for high-risk cutaneous SCC. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 578-594, 2017.

Background Despite advantages in terms of cancer control and organ preservation, the benefits of chemoradiation (CTRT) may be offset by potentially severe, treatment-related toxicities particularly in older patients. Our objectives were to assess the type and frequency of toxicities in older adults with locally or regionally advanced, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of the (HNSCC) receiving either primary CTRT or RT alone. Methods Using SEER cancer registry data linked with Medicare claims, we identified patients aged 66 years or older with locally advanced HNSCC, diagnosed 2001–2009, who received CTRT or RT alone. We examined differences in the frequency of toxicity-related hospital admissions and emergency room (ER) visits as well as feeding tube use and estimated the impact of chemotherapy on the likelihood of toxicity, controlling for demographic and disease characteristics. Results Of patients who received CTRT (N=1,502), 62% had a treatment-related toxicity, compared with 46% of patients who received RT alone (N=775). Controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, CTRT patients were twice as likely to experience an acute toxicity compared with their RT only peers. Fifty-five percent of CTRT patients had a feeding tube placed during or after treatment compared with 28% of the RT-only group. Conclusions In this population-based cohort of older adults with HNSCC, the rate of acute toxicities and feeding tube use in patients receiving CTRT was considerable. It is possible that for certain older patients, the potential benefit of adding CT to RT does not outweigh the harms of this combined modality therapy.

Objective Primary curative treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer may include surgery or chemoradiation, although recommendations vary and both are associated with complications. We evaluated predictors and trends in the use of these modalities and compared rates of complications and overall survival in a population-based cohort of older adults. Study Design Retrospective population-based cohort study Methods Using SEER cancer registry data linked with Medicare claims, we identified patients over 65 with advanced laryngeal cancer diagnosed 1999-2007 who had total laryngectomy (TL) or chemoradiation (CTRT) within 6 months following diagnosis. We identified complications and estimated the impact of treatment on overall survival, using propensity score methods. Results The proportion of patients receiving TL declined from 74% in 1999 to 26% in 2007 (p<0.0001). Almost 20% of CTRT patients had a tracheostomy following treatment and 57% had a feeding tube. TL was associated with an 18% lower risk of death, adjusting for patient and disease characteristics. The benefit of TL was greatest in patients with the highest propensity to receive surgery. Conclusion TL remains an important treatment option in well selected older patients. However, treatment selection is complex and, factors such as functional status, patient preference, surgeon expertise and post-treatment support services should play a role in treatment decisions.

Current levels of public awareness regarding head and neck cancers are suboptimal, despite increased incidence and mortality. Scheduled and opportunistic screening, coupled with efforts to enhance education and health behaviour modification, are highly recommended for pre-defined, high-risk, targeted populations. This can enable early detection and therefore improve morbidity and mortality.