This review provides background information on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) classification and pathophysiology and reviews various antiemetic agents for CINV prophylaxis, including corticosteroids, serotonin receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RAs), tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists (NK1 RAs), and olanzapine. Other less commonly used agents are briefly discussed. Practical considerations are reviewed as well, including emetogenicity of chemotherapeutic regimens, patient-specific risk factors for CINV, principles of CINV management, health economics outcome research, and quality of life. Available data on the newly FDA-approved antiemetic combination netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) is also reviewed. Prevention of CINV is an important goal in managing patients with cancer and is especially difficult with respect to nausea and delayed CINV. Corticosteroids are a mainstay of CINV prophylaxis and are usually given in combination with other therapies. The 5-HT3 RA palonosetron has shown increased efficacy over other agents in the same class for prevention of delayed emesis with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and NK1 RAs improve emesis prevention in combination with 5-HT3 RAs and dexamethasone. Olanzapine has shown efficacy for CINV prophylaxis and the treatment of breakthrough CINV. The new combination therapy, NEPA, has been shown to be efficacious for the prevention of acute, delayed, and overall CINV. Risk factors that have been identified for CINV include gender, age, and alcohol intake. It is important to assess the emetogenicity of chemotherapy regimens as well as the potential impact of patient risk factors in order to provide adequate prophylaxis. Acute and delayed CINV are severe, burdensome side effects of chemotherapy; however, new data on prevention and the discovery of new agents can further improve CINV control.

Imatinib mesylate, licensed to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, is metabolized by means of cytochrome P450 3A and excreted primarily in the bile. Although the bioavailability of imatinib mesylate is more than 97%, the exact gastrointestinal site of its absorption is unknown. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to quantitate imatinib and its metabolite CGP74588 in the plasma and jejunostomy output of a patient with newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia. She had previously lost most of her small bowel and all of her colon as a result of mesenteric artery thrombosis and radiation-induced colitis and/or proctitis. Imatinib pharmacokinetics in plasma indicated that approximately 20% of the patient's 400-mg dose was absorbed. The jejunostomy output contained 338 mg of imatinib, which was consistent with 320 mg of a nonabsorbed dose plus approximately 23% of the absorbed dose being excreted unchanged in the bile. These data indicate the importance of considering gastrointestinal anatomic abnormalities or disease states when oral imatinib is dosed.

Prolonging TPT infusion from 30 minute to 4 hours increases the duration of exposure in the CSF. This study demonstrates the ability to develop treatment strategies of systemically administered chemotherapy to enhance cytotoxic exposure in the CSF.

Neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists (RAs) are commonly coadministered with serotonin (5-HT3) RAs (e.g. palonosetron (PALO)) to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting. Netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA), an oral fixed combination of netupitant (NETU)—a new NK1 RA—and PALO, is currently under development. In vitro data suggest that NETU inhibits CYP3A4 and is a substrate for and weak inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). This review evaluates potential drug–drug interactions between NETU or NEPA and CYP3A4 substrates/inducers/inhibitors or P-gp substrates in healthy subjects. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were evaluated for each drug when NETU was coadministered with PALO (single doses) and when single doses of NETU or NEPA were coadministered with CYP3A4 substrates (erythromycin (ERY), midazolam (MID), dexamethasone (DEX), or oral contraceptives), inhibitors (ketoconazole (KETO)), or inducers (rifampicin (RIF)), or a P-gp substrate (digoxin (DIG)). Results showed no relevant PK interactions between NETU and PALO. Coadministration of NETU increased MID and ERY exposure and significantly increased DEX exposure in a dose-dependent manner; NETU exposure was unaffected. NEPA coadministration had no clinically significant effect on oral contraception, although levonorgestrel exposure increased. NETU exposure increased after coadministration of NEPA with KETO and decreased after coadministration with RIF; PALO exposure was unaffected. NETU coadministration did not influence DIG exposure. In conclusion, there were no clinically relevant interactions between NETU and PALO, or NEPA and oral contraceptives (based on levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol exposure). Coadministration of NETU or NEPA with CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors/substrates should be done with caution. Dose reduction is recommended for DEX. Dose adjustments are not needed for NETU coadministration with P-gp substrates.

No abstract

The most effective regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who do not achieve complete remission (CR) after one course of cytarabine and an anthracycline has not been extensively studied. We evaluated retrospectively the efficacy, toxicity, and prognostic factors for the achievement of CR following mitoxantrone and etoposide in 74 patients with newly diagnosed AML who did not respond to one course of therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin. CR was achieved in 39% of patients; 14% died of infectious complications; no grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicities were observed. Median duration of overall survival was 9.0 months (95% CI 5.8-14.9 months). The median duration of relapse-free survival was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.0-19.3 months). A lower CR rate was associated with unfavorable risk status at diagnosis and higher percent blasts. Our data suggest that the combination of etoposide and mitoxantrone is an effective second-course therapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML.

The most effective reinduction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who do not achieve complete remission (CR) after one cycle of cytarabine combined with an anthracycline is not well established. In an effort to search for new synergistic and non-cross resistant antileukemic regimens different chemotherapeutic combinations have been investigated in refractory AML patients. Multiple regimens including high dose cytarabine, anthracyclines, fludarabine and etoposide have been used with CR rates up to 40%. Mitoxantrone and etoposide have activity in AML as induction agents but their role in reinduction in patients not responding to first line therapy has not been fully established. In the current retrospective study we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of mitoxantrone and etoposide in AML patients treated at our institution who did not respond to first induction therapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline. A total of fifty seven AML patients were treated with mitoxantrone and etoposide (mean age 55 years, range 18–75 years). Twenty four patients were treated with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2/d and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d both administered intravenously, days 1 to 5 (regimen 5+5) and thirty three patients were treated with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2/d administered intravenously days 1 to 3 and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d administered intravenously, days 1 to 5 (regimen 3+5). Twenty six of fifty seven patients (46%) achieved CR. CR was achieved in 38% of patients (9/24) treated with the 5+5 regimen and 52% of patients (17/33) treated with the 3+5 regimen. Mean blast percentage before treatment with mitoxantrone and etoposide was 25% in patients who achieved CR vs 40% in patients who did not achieve CR (p < 0.03). Grade 3/4 hepatic toxicities were seen in 5% (3/57) of patients and there were no grade 3 or 4 renal toxicities. The median duration of neutropenia in patients achieving CR was 29 days after reinduction. 10% (6/57) of the patients died from infectious complications. Cytogenetic analyses were performed prior to first-line therapy in all patients. Patients with favorable cytogenetics treated with etoposide and mitoxantorne had 100% CR (3/3), patients with standard cytogenetics had 58% CR (19/33) and patients with unfavorable cytogenetics had 19% CR (4/21). Overall CR was achieved in 61% (22/36) of patients with favorable and standard cytogenetics. Our data suggest that the combination of etoposide and mitoxantorne is an active and well tolerated regimen, especially in patients with favorable and standard cytogenetics, and warrants further studies in prospective trials.

7073 Background: The goal of induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is complete remission with restoration of normal bone marrow. If residual leukemia is present after the first course of induction therapy, patients receive a second course identical to the first or receive a non-cross resistant antileukemic regimen. Methods: In a retrospective study of adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML treated at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute between December 2002 and May 2008, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2/d) and etoposide (100 mg/m2/d), both administered intravenously within 5 days as second course therapy of patients not responding to first-course induction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin. Univariate and multivariate associations between patient characteristics and complete response (CR) were assessed by logistic regression, with overall- and relapse-free survival estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 74 AML patients (mean age 56 years, range: 18–73 years) completed treatment with etoposide and mitoxantrone; 29 (39%) achieved CR. Lower CR rate was associated with unfavorable cytogenetic risk status at diagnosis and higher percent blasts prior to treatment with mitoxantrone and etoposide. Ten (14%) patients died due to infectious complications. No grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicities were observed. One patient developed grade 3 cardiac toxicity. Median duration of neutrophil recovery following therapy in patients achieving CR was 29 days. Median overall survival was 9.0 months (95% CI 5.8–14.9 months). The 29 patients who achieved CR received postremission therapy: 16 of these eventually relapsed, while 4 others died without evidence of relapse. Median duration of relapse-free survival in these 29 patients was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.0–19.3 months). Conclusions: Our study suggests that the combination of etoposide and mitoxantorne is an active and well-tolerated regimen as second-course therapy in newly diagnosed AML patients who have persistent leukemia after a first course of induction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin. No significant financial relationships to disclose.