KAP1 (TRIM28) is a transcriptional regulator in embryonic development that controls stem cell self-renewal, chromatin organization and the DNA damage response, acting as an essential co-repressor for KRAB family zinc finger proteins (KRAB-ZNF). To gain insight into the function of this large gene family, we developed an antibody that recognizes the conserved zinc fingers linker region (ZnFL) in multiple KRAB-ZNF. Here we report that the expression of many KRAB-ZNF along with active SUMOlyated KAP1 is elevated widely in human breast cancers. KAP1 silencing in breast cancer cells reduced proliferation and inhibited the growth and metastasis of tumor xenografts. Conversely, KAP1 overexpression stimulated cell proliferation and tumor growth. In cells where KAP1 was silenced, we identified multiple downregulated genes linked to tumor progression and metastasis, including EREG/epiregulin, PTGS2/COX2, MMP1, MMP2 and CD44, along with downregulation of multiple KRAB-ZNF proteins. KAP1-dependent stabilization of KRAB-ZNF required direct interactions with KAP1. Together, our results show that KAP1-mediated stimulation of multiple KRAB-ZNF contributes to the growth and metastasis of breast cancer.
Several master transcription factors (TFs) can activate the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, their individual and combinatorial contributions to EMT in breast cancer are not defined. We show that overexpression of EMT-TFs individually in epithelial cells upregulated endogenous SNAI2, ZEB1/2, TCF4 and TWIST1/2 as a result of positive feedback mediated in part by suppression of their negative regulator microRNAs miR200s/203/205. We identified TCF4 as a potential new target of miR200s. Expression of ZEB1/2 strongly correlated with the mesenchymal phenotype in breast cancer cells, with the CD24−/CD44+ stemness profile, and with lower expression of core epithelial genes in human breast tumors. Knockdown of EMT-TFs identified the key role of ZEB1 and its functional cooperation with other EMT-TFs in the maintenance of the mesenchymal state. Inducible ZEB1+2 knockdown in xenograft models inhibited pulmonary metastasis, emphasizing their critical role in dissemination from primary site and in extravasation. However, ZEB1+2 depletion one week post intravenous injection did not inhibit lung colonization, suggesting that ZEB1/2 and EMT are not essential for macrometastatic outgrowth. These results provide strong evidence that EMT is orchestrated by coordinated expression of several EMT-TFs and establish ZEB1 as a key master regulator of EMT and metastasis in breast cancer.
Aims:
We evaluated a Selective Bladder Denervation (SBD) device, which uses radiofrequency ablation, for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome in terms of its nerve denervation, ablation characteristics, and post-treatment healing.
Methods:
Using the SBD device, eight fresh extirpated ovine bladder trigones were treated (90°C set point for 60 s) and nitroblue tetrazolium viability stained to characterize the ablation. In addition, 12 trigones were treated in vivo with three adjacent ablations and divided into survival cohorts: Day 7, Day 30, and Day 90 to assess the ablations and their associated healing.
Results:
The ex vivo single trigone ablations had a 7.9 ± 0.9 mm width and 5.7 ± 1.0 mm thickness that involved the submucosa, detrusor muscle, adventitia, and vagina. Microscopic viability staining confirmed complete nerve necrosis within the targeted tissue. The in vivo Day 7 trigones supported the ex vivo ablation characteristics and showed up to minimal inflammation, granulation tissue, and collagen fibrosis. Day 30 trigones had essentially absent inflammation and granulation tissue with evolving collagen fibrosis at the ablation's periphery. Day 90 trigones had essentially absent acute inflammation, minimal chronic inflammation, essentially absent granulation tissue, and up to mild collagen fibrosis. No ureteral/urethral alterations, vesico-vaginal fistulas, or other complications were identified.
Conclusions:
The SBD device provided a targeted trigone ablation with resultant denervation. The tissue healing timeline followed that expected for a hyperthermic ablation and was characterized by a fibroproliferative healing response with limited inflammation and granulation tissue. The ablations did not impact the overlying bladder mucosal surface.
Objective: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased exponentially. Costs and outcomes, however, vary considerably by indication. We sought to elucidate and quantify these differences.Methods: Adult patients supported on ECMO between 2008 and 2016 were analyzed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We divided the study period into an early (2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013) and late period (2013)(2014)(2015)(2016). The primary outcome was hospital charges, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, length of stay (LOS), and duration of ECMO support. These were stratified by the 5 most common indications: postcardiotomy shock (PCS), cardiogenic shock (CS), severe acute respiratory failure (SARF), heart (HT), and lung transplantation (LT). Both patient and hospital characteristics were assessed. Charges were adjusted for inflation and analyzed using a generalized linear model with gamma distribution. Pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction was used to evaluate the cost and multivariate logistic regression to assess the risk of mortality.Results: Data pertaining to 15,829 adult patients were evaluated. Mean age of the entire cohort was 52.8 years, 8895 (56%) were white, and 10,278 (65%) were male. PCS was the predominant indication for ECMO (39%), followed by CS (37%). SARF accounted for 15% and HT and LT accounted for 3.9% and 5.4%, respectively. Mean LOS and duration of ECMO support were 23.4 days and 5.3 days respectively. Mean hospital charges per hospitalization for the entire cohort were USD 731,914 per patient. Charges per patient pertaining to hospitalizations in which ECMO was used in transplant patients were the highest:
Introduction: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a resource-intense modality whose usage is expanding rapidly. It is a costly endeavor and best conducted in a multidisciplinary setting. There is a growing impetus to mitigate the mortality and costs associated with ECMO. We sought to examine the impact of complications on mortality and hospital costs in patients on ECMO. Methods: Using the NIS database, we performed multivariable logistic regression to assess the influence of complications on the primary outcome, in-hospital mortality. Similarly, we performed multivariable survey linear regression analysis to evaluate the effect of the complications on hospital costs. Results: Of the 12,637 patients supported using ECMO between 2004 and 2013, 9836 (78%) developed at least one complication. The three most common complications were acute kidney injury (32.8%), bloodstream infection (31.8%), and bleeding (27.8%). An ECMO hospitalization with no complications was associated with median costs of $53,470, a single complication with costs of $97,560, two complications with costs of $139,035, and three complication with costs of $162,284. A single complication was associated with a 165% increase in odds of mortality. Two or three complications resulted in 375% or 627% higher odds of mortality, respectively. Having one, two, or three complications was associated with 24%, 38%, or 38% increase in median costs respectively (Figure 1). Complications associated with the highest median costs were central line-associated bloodstream infection $217,751; liver failure $176,201; bloodstream infection $169,529. Conclusion: In-hospital mortality and costs increase with each incremental complication in patients on ECMO. Accurate prediction and mitigation of complications is likely to improve outcomes and cost.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.