In preliminary studies, several commercial polyvalent fluorescent antibody (FA) preparations were evaluated for specificity and crossreactivity and an FA method was developed for the screening of Salmonella in products. Approximately 4000 product samples were tested by the FA method and the results were compared to those from the official final action AOAC method, 46.013–46.026. Only 4 FA falsenegatives were found for a total of 619 confirmed positive Salmonella samples. The FA false-positive rate was 7%. The method was then subjected to a 2-phase collaborative study. In Phase I, 22 analysts tested 5 inoculated and 5 uninoculated samples of dried milk. In Phase II, 5 naturally contaminated and 5 presumably uncontaminated foods were analyzed. The study was designed to compare results from 11 analysts experienced in FA methodology with those from 11 analysts with little or no experience. Selenite cystine (SC) and tetrathionate (TT) broths were used for enrichment and both were inoculated into SC for post-enrichment. All 4 combinations (SC, TT, SC-SC, and TT-SC) were used with the FA method to determine the best technique. Results were compared to the analysis with TT and SC by the AOAC culture method. In all studies, FA analysis with SC-SC gave the highest correlation with the AOAC method. In a total of 200 samples, the experienced group found 125 AOAC positives and 127 FA positives ; no FA false-negatives and only 2 falsepositives were reported. The inexperienced group reported 9 FA false-negatives and 5 FA false-positives. All false-negatives occurred in only 3 of the inexperienced laboratories. These studies showed that enrichment and post-enrichment in SC gave the best FA results and that training in FA methodology is required for correlation with existing AOAC methodology. The FA method for the detection of Salmonella has been adopted as official first action.
A total of 236 samples of infant foods, including honey, dry cereal, nonfat dry milk, evaporated milk, canned formula, and canned baby food, were collected in the New York City area and tested for the presence of Clostridium botulinum spores. Methods for recovery of spores were validated using foods spiked with 4 spores/mL or g. None of the products contained C. botulinum spores, indicating that their incidence in these commercial foods is not widespread. This limited study did not identify any food types that could be suspected of being involved in the transmission of infant botulism.
The organism most frequently encountered during the 1971 outbreak of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) in soft ripened cheese was a strain that failed to ferment lactose broth within 48 h. Since existing methods for E. coli are dependent upon fermentation of this sugar, such strains can remain undetected, particularly when present in low numbers. Therefore, a cultural testing procedure was developed to insure isolation of both lactose-positive and -negative strains. This method used GN broth, modified by substituting lactose and arabinose for glucose and D-mannitol, as an enrichment medium. MacConkey agar, used as a plating medium, was modified by substituting arabinose for half the lactose. The cultural procedure was used in conjunction with a fluorescent antibody method to screen cheese for the presence of presumptive enteropathogenic E. coli . Suspected isolates were subjected to further biochemical and serological testing and identified as members of specific serogroups. These methods were used for the analysis of over 2,000 wheels of cheese; over 10% of the samples tested were found to contain strains belonging to six different serogroups associated with diarrheal diseases. No attempt was made to confirm pathogenicity by in vivo tests. Enumeration of E. coli in cheese showed that numbers increased during storage. Cheese with less than 10 organisms/g initially increased to over 10 5 at room temperature and over 10 3 at 4 C within 10 days. With higher initial counts, levels up to 10 9 were found at 4 C. These studies showed that the high levels of E. coli encountered in these products cannot be used as a direct indicator of post-processing contamination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.