In this study of lower third molar extraction, oral paracetamol is not inferior to i.v. for postoperative analgesia. ISRCTN Registration http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN77607163.

Background: Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) is a technique for measuring the physiological profile of the anal canal, primarily the internal anal sphincter. Evaluation of a new continuous method, recently developed for the urethra, would enable its future application for investigation of rectal reflexes. Methods: Patients aged 18 and over with fecal incontinence (FI) were included. Stepwise AAR parameters were compared with continuous opening pressure (Op, cmH 2 O), opening elastance (Oe, cmH 2 O/mm 2 ), closing pressure (Cp, cmH 2 O), closing elastance (Ce, cmH 2 O/mm 2 ), hysteresis (Hys, [%]), squeeze opening pressure (SqOp, cmH 2 O), and squeeze opening elastance (SqOe, cmH 2 O/mm 2 ). Vaizey incontinence and Manchester Health Questionnaire scores were also collected.Results: Thirty-two patients, 26 females were analyzed. Median age: 60 (range, 32-75). Median AAR parameters of Op (37.50 vs 35.15, P = .031), Oe (1.31 vs 0.84, P < .0001), Ce (1.11 vs 0.88, P < .0001), Hys (37.75 vs 19.04, P < .0001), and SqOe (1.27 vs 1.06, P = .005) were significantly higher with the continuous method. Cp (22.70 vs 27.22, P = .003) is lower and SqOp (96.87 vs 59.47, P = .71) not significantly different. The continuous technique had superior repeatability between cycles for all AAR parameters except Oe, which was equivalent and continuous SqOp had a stronger negative correlation with Vaizey score than stepwise (−0.46, P = .009 vs −0.37, P = .038). Conclusions:The differences seen between the two techniques are likely to be related to the rate of stretch. The continuous technique appears to represent a more physiological measurement of anal sphincter function than the stepwise technique particularly in the assessment of voluntary squeeze function. K E Y W O R D SAAR, anal acoustic reflectometry, anorectal physiology, fecal incontinence, pelvic floor

A considerable proportion of patients treated with SNS therapy require surgical revision. These unplanned procedures are associated with substantial unexpected costs that financially burden SNS services.

Background:Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters.Methods:Fifty patients with FI underwent 30 min of PTNS treatment, weekly for 12 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry, bowel diaries and Vaizey questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Successful treatment was determined as a greater than 50% reduction in FI episodes.Results:Fifty patients with FI were studied; 39 women, median age 62 years (range 30–82). Compared with pretreatment, there were reductions in episodes of urgency (16.0 versus 11.4, p = 0.006), overall FI (14.5 versus 9.1, p = 0.001), urge FI (5.4 versus 3.2, p = 0.016) and passive FI (9.1 versus 5.9, p = 0.008). Vaizey score was reduced (16.1 versus 14.5, p = 0.002). Rectal sensory volumes (ml) decreased (onset 40.3 versus 32.6, p = 0.014, call 75.7 versus 57.5, p < 0.001, urge 104.1 versus 87.4, p = 0.004). There was no significant change in anal canal pressures (mmHg) (maximum resting pressure 41.4 versus 44.2, p = 0.39, maximum squeeze pressure, 78.7 versus 88.2, p = 0.15, incremental squeeze pressure 37.2 versus 44.1, p = 0.22). Reduction in FI episodes did not correlate with changes in physiological parameters (p > 0.05). Treatment success of 44% was independent of changes in manometric parameters (p > 0.05).Conclusions:PTNS has a measureable physiological effect on rectal sensory volumes without an effect on anal canal pressures. It also reduces FI episodes; however, this effect is independent of changing physiology, suggesting that PTNS has a complex mechanism of action.

No abstract