Background: Newer designs and techniques of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have challenged the assumption of ankle arthrodesis (AA) as the primary treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. The objective of this study was to compare physical and mental function, ankle-specific function, pain intensity, and rates of revision surgery and minor complications between these 2 procedures and to explore heterogeneous treatment effects due to age, body mass index (BMI), patient sex, comorbidities, and employment on patients treated by 1 of these 2 methods. Methods: This was a multisite prospective cohort study comparing outcomes of surgical treatment of ankle arthritis. Subjects who presented after nonoperative management had failed received either TAA or AA using standard-of-treatment care and rehabilitation. Outcomes included the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) scores, pain, ankle-related adverse events, and treatment success. Results: Five hundred and seventeen participants underwent surgery and completed a baseline assessment. At 24 months, the mean improvement in FAAM activities of daily living (ADL) and SF-36 PCS scores was significantly greater in the TAA group than in the AA group, with a difference between groups of 9 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3, 15) and 4 points (95% CI = 1, 7), respectively. The crude incidence risks of revision surgery and complications were greater in the AA group; however, these differences were no longer significant after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI). The treatment success rate was greater after TAA than after AA for those with an FCI of 4 (80% versus 62%) and not fully employed (81% versus 58%) but similar for those with an FCI score of 2 (81% versus 77%) and full-time employment (79% versus 78%). Conclusions: At 2-year follow-up, both AA and TAA were effective. Improvement in several patient-reported outcomes was greater after TAA than after AA, without a significant difference in the rates of revision surgery and complications. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
There is some uncertainty as to whether the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) is a real entity or just radiographic artifact and whether it can be reliably measured. If it is intrinsic to the bone, it should not change with bone position. If it is clinically useful, it should be reproducible. Pre-operative and post-operative radiographs of 32 patients undergoing a proximal bony procedure of the first ray were evaluated independently by three foot and ankle specialists in order to determine the intra and inter-observer reliability of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA). In addition, the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and joint congruency/subluxation were determined. We used ANOVA (Scheffe's F-test) to determine reliability of the angular measurements; a p value of less than 0.05 indicates poor reliability and a p value of greater than 0.05 indicates reliability. Intra-observer reliability was good for all angular measurements (HVA, IMA, DMAA pre-op, and DMAA post-op) with p values ranging from 0.33 to 0.95. Inter-observer reliability of the HVA and IMA was good (p=0.63 and p=0.32). Inter-observer reliability of the pre-op DMAA approached statistically poor reliability (p=0.09) and the post-op DMAA reliability was poor (p=0.002). The DMAA reduced after the proximal procedure as measured by all observers, and averaged a reduction of 3.9 degrees. Weighted kappa analysis also revealed that there was poor agreement in the determination of congruency and subluxation (Kappa statistic ranged from 0.07 to 0.19). This study suggests that there may be limited value in the DMAA as a clinical measure as it varies with examiner and with the hallux valgus angle.
We compared the pressure distribution in the ankle and posterior facet of the subtalar joint following 1 cm medial and lateral displacement calcaneal osteotomies to the pressure distribution in the intact foot. Six cadaver specimens were loaded in neutral alignment while pressure measurements were recorded. A 1-cm medial displacement osteotomy shifted the average center of force in the ankle 1.0 mm medially (p = 0.36) while a lateral displacement osteotomy shifted the center of force 1.1 mm laterally (p = 0.42). There was also a slight shift in the percentage of pressure toward the side of the talus to which the calcaneus was shifted. For the lateral displacement osteotomy, the pressure increased 4.0% in the lateral-most quadrant (p = 0.05), while the medial osteotomy increased the pressure 1.3% in the medial quadrant (p = 0.30). In the subtalar joint, a medial displacement osteotomy shifted the pressure distribution slightly medially (5.9%, p = 0.06) and more anteriorly (9.6%, p = 0.02) while the distribution was shifted laterally (5.9%, p = 0.17) and anteriorly (5.6%, p = 0.03) with a lateral displacement osteotomy. These shifts of percentage of pressure between quadrants of the joints were slight-less than 5% in the ankle and less than 10% in the subtalar joint. Significant translation of the calcaneal tuberosity appears to have only a small effect on pressure distribution in the ankle and posterior facet of the subtalar joint in a weighted cadaver model.
Background: We analyzed self-reported outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients treated with ankle arthrodesis or total ankle replacement (TAR) during a time of transition from older to newer-generation TAR implants. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study comparing outcomes in 273 consecutive patients treated for ankle arthritis with arthrodesis or TAR between 2005 and 2011. Adult patients with end-stage ankle arthritis who were able to walk and willing and able to respond to surveys were included in the study. Patients were excluded when they had another lower-limb problem that might affect walking. At baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36-month follow-up visits, participants completed a pain score, a Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA), and a Short Form-36 (SF-36) survey. Results: There was significant mean improvement in most outcomes after surgery regardless of procedure. In general, the greatest improvement occurred during the first 6 months of follow-up. Linear mixed-effects regression adjusted for differences at baseline in age, body mass index (BMI), and surgery type showed that at 6 months the scores were improved by a mean (and standard error) of 12.6 ± 0.7 (33%) on the MFA, 22.0 ± 1.4 (56%) on the SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) scale, 32.4 ± 1.6 (93%) on the SF-36 Bodily Pain (BP) scale, and 4.0 ± 0.2 (63%) on the pain rating scale. The mean improvements in the MFA and SF-36 PF scores over the 3-year follow-up period were significantly better after the TARs than after the arthrodeses, with differences between the 2 groups of 3.6 ± 1.6 (p = 0.023) and 7.5 ± 2.9 (p = 0.0098), respectively. The differences between the 2 groups were slightly greater when only the newer TAR devices were compared with the arthrodeses (MFA = 3.8 ± 1.8 [p = 0.031], SF-36 PF = 8.8 ± 3.3 [p = 0.0074], SF-36 BP = 7.3 ± 3.6 [p = 0.045], and pain score = 0.8 ± 0.4 [p = 0.038]). Conclusions: Patients reported improved comfort and function after both surgical treatments. The average improvement in the MFA and SF-36 PF scores was better after TAR than after arthrodesis, particularly when the TAR had been done with later-generation implants. Younger patients had greater functional improvements than older patients. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Eleven feet (nine patients) with symptomatic flatfoot deformities of various etiologies that had failed nonoperative treatment underwent distal calcaneal lengthenings. Pre- and postoperative plantar pressure measurements and radiographic parameters were compared and a postoperative clinical evaluation was performed using the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scoring system. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 20 months (mean, 11.1 months). Plantar pressure parameters including contact area, mean, and peak pressures indicated significant lateral shifts in the weight-bearing surface of the foot. The most significant radiographic changes were an improvement in the talonavicular coverage angle (mean, 17.3 degrees) on the anteroposterior view and an improvement in the talo-first metatarsal angle (16.2 degrees) on the lateral view. The average postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 90 with seven excellent, three good, and one poor results.
The Evans calcaneal lengthening osteotomy has gained popularity in recent years for the treatment of symptomatic flexible pes planus deformity. To our knowledge, the occurrence of a stress fracture of the fifth metatarsal has not been reported after this procedure. We report two such cases and discuss the probable mechanism of this problem, a relative overloading of the lateral aspect of the foot. Both cases were treated successfully with immobilization. Clinicians should be aware of this possible problem and treat it appropriately.
Patients with midfoot arthrosis had a different ratio of the first to the second metatarsal length than did a similarly aged cohort without midfoot arthrosis. The patients had a relatively short first metatarsal or a relatively long second metatarsal, or both. Midfoot arthrosis may have a mechanical etiology. Recognition of risk factors is the first step in developing prevention strategies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.