The significance of changes in QLQ-C30 scores can be interpreted in terms of small, moderate, or large changes in quality of life as reported by patients in the SSQ. The magnitude of these changes also can be used to calculate the sample sizes required to detect a specified change in clinical trials.
Purpose:To determine the effect of intravenous (IV) low-osmolality iodinated contrast material (LOCM) on the development of post-computed tomography (CT) acute kidney injury (AKI), stratified by pre-CT estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), in patients with stable renal function.
Materials and Methods:Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study. CT examinations performed over a 10-year period on unique adult inpatients with sufficient serum creatinine (SCr) data and stable renal function (difference between baseline and pre-CT SCr within 0.3 mg/dL and 50% of baseline) were identified. A 1:1 propensity score matched cohort analysis with multivariate analysis of effects was performed with post-CT AKI as the primary outcome measure (8826 nonenhanced and 8826 IV contrast agent-enhanced CT studies in 17 652 patients). Propensity matching was performed with respect to likelihood of receiving IV contrast material (19 tested covariates). Post-CT AKI with Acute Kidney Injury Network SCr criteria was the primary endpoint. A stepwise multivariate conditional logistic regression model was performed to identify the effect of IV LOCM on post-CT AKI.
Results:After 1:1 propensity matching, IV LOCM had a significant effect on the development of post-CT AKI (P = .04). This risk increased with decreases in pre-CT eGFR (60 mL/ min/1.73 m 2 : odds ratio,
Conclusion:IV LOCM is a nephrotoxic risk factor in patients with a stable eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , with a trend toward significance at 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . IV LOCM does not appear to be a nephrotoxic risk factor in patients with a pre-CT eGFR of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater.q RSNA, 2013
The results of this trial show the superiority of CEF over CMF in terms of both disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer.
Introduction
Up to 6% of patients experience complications after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence and predictors of periprocedural complications after RFA for AF.
Methods and Results
The subjects were 1295 consecutive patients (age=60±10 years) who underwent RFA (n=1642) for paroxysmal (53%) or persistent AF (47%) from January 2007 to January 2010. A complication occurred in 57 patients (3.5%); a vascular access complication in 31 (1.9%); pericardial tamponade in 20 (1.2%); a thromboembolic event in 4 (0.2%); deep venous thrombosis in 1 (<0.01%); and pulmonary vein stenosis in 1 patient (<0.01%). There were no procedure-related deaths. On multivariate analysis, female gender (OR=2.27; ±95% CI: 1.31–2.57, P<0.01) and procedures performed in July or August (OR=2.10; ±95% CI: 1.16–3.80, P=0.01) were independent predictors of any complication. For vascular complications, treatment with clopidogrel (OR=4.40; ±95% CI: 1.43–13.53, P=0.01), female gender (OR=3.65; ±95% CI: 1.72–7.75, P<0.01) and performing RFA in July or August (OR=2.71; ±95% CI: 1.25–5.87, P=0.01) were independent predictors. The only predictor of cardiac tamponade was prior RFA (OR=3.32; ±95% CI: 0.95–11.61; P<0.05).
Conclusion
Prevalence of perioperative complications for RFA of AF is 3.5% and vascular access complications constitute the majority. The need for clopidogrel therapy should be carefully considered prior to RFA. At teaching institutions close supervision should be exercised during vascular access early in the year. Improvements in ablation technology and elimination of the need for repeat procedures may decrease the risk of pericardial tamponade.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.