Equilibrium binding studies and viscosity experiments are described that characterize the interaction of delta- and lambda-[Ru(o-phen)3]2+ with calf thymus DNA. The mode of binding of these compounds to DNA is a matter of controversy. Both isomers of [Ru(o-phen)3]2+ were found to bind but weakly to DNA, with binding constants of 4.9 (+/- 0.3) x 10(4) M-1 and 2.8 (+/- 0.2) x 10(4) M-1 determined for the delta and lambda isomers, respectively, at 20 degrees C in a solution containing 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.1) and 10 mM NaCl. We determined that the quantity delta log K/delta log [Na+] equals 1.37 and 1.24 for the delta and lambda isomers, respectively. Application of polyelectrolyte theory allows us to use these values to show quantitatively that both the delta and lambda isomers are essentially electrostatically bound to DNA. Viscosity experiments show that binding the lambda isomer does not alter the relative viscosity of DNA to any appreciable extent, while binding of the delta isomer decreases the relative viscosity of DNA. From these viscosity results, we conclude that neither isomer of [Ru(o-phen)3]2+ binds to DNA by classical intercalation.

Absorbance and fluorescence methods, circular dichroism, UV melting experiments, viscosity, and competition dialysis were used to study the interaction of delta and lambda tris(phenanthroline)ruthenium(II) with DNA. The results of these studies indicated that both isomers bind to DNA by a single mode. The two isomers differ, however, in their effect on the hydrodynamic properties of DNA as measured by viscosity and, therefore, probably differ in their individual binding modes. The optical properties of the fully bound compounds differ from those of the free, but the perturbations of their visible absorbance and fluorescence emission spectra are modest when compared to changes observed for other DNA binding compounds. Binding of both isomers to DNA was found to be weak (in comparison to proven intercalators), with binding constants on the order of 10(4) M-1 determined for their binding to calf thymus DNA. A small, positive enthalpy was found for the binding of each isomer to DNA, suggesting that binding is entropically driven. Both isomers increased the melting temperature of DNA, with little quantitative difference between the two. A modest base specificity was found for each isomer, with the delta isomer preferentially binding to GC base pairs, and the lambda isomer preferentially binding to AT base pairs. Competition dialysis was used to examine the preference of delta and lambda Ru for right-handed B DNA and left-handed Z DNA. Neither isomer exhibits significant selectivity for these radically different DNA secondary structures.

No abstract

Utilizing linear dichroism (LD), circular dichroism (CD), and fluorescence energy transfer, the binding geometries of a series of Co(3+)-porphyrins and their free ligands were examined. The compounds studied were Co-meso-tetrakis(N-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin (CoTMPyP) and its free ligand (H2-TMPyP), Co-meso-tetrakis(N-n-butylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin (CoTBPyP) and its free ligand (H2TBPyP), and Co-meso-tetrakis(N-n-octylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin (CoTOPyP). The two non-metalloporphyrins exhibit negative LD, having angles of roughly 75 degrees relative to the DNA helix axis. They also display negative CD and a significant contact energy transfer from the DNA bases. On the other hand, the three metalloporphyrins display orientation angles of roughly 45 degrees between the porphyrin plane and the helix axis of DNA. Furthermore, they exhibit positive CD and no contact energy transfer from DNA bases. These observations show that the metalloporphyrins are not intercalated whereas non-metalloporphyrins having four freely rotating meso-aryl groups intercalate between the base pairs of DNA. In the presence of KHSO5, the cobalt porphyrins cleave closed circular PM2 DNA in a single strand manner, i.e., a single activation event on the porphyrin leads to a break in one of the DNA strands. A kinetic analysis of the cleavage data revealed that cleavage rates are in the order CoTMPyP > CoTBPyP > CoTOPyP with the difference being due to different DNA affinities rather than differences in cleavage rate-constants. Based on these and earlier observations, the metalloporphyrins appear bound to a partially melted region of DNA.

The antitumor effects of platinum(IV) complexes, considered prodrugs for cisplatin, are believed to be due to biological reduction of Pt(IV) to Pt(II), with the reduction products binding to DNA and other cellular targets. In this work we used pBR322 DNA to capture the products of reduction of oxoplatin, c,t,c-[PtCl(2)(OH)(2)(NH(3))(2)], 3, and a carboxylate-modified analog, c,t,c-[PtCl(2)(OH)(O(2)CCH(2)CH(2)CO(2)H)(NH(3))(2)], 4, by ascorbic acid (AsA) or glutathione (GSH). Since carbonate plays a significant role in the speciation of platinum complexes in solution, we also investigated the effects of carbonate on the reduction/DNA-binding process. In pH 7.4 buffer in the absence of carbonate, both 3 and 4 are reduced by AsA to cisplatin (confirmed using ((195))Pt NMR), which binds to and unwinds closed circular DNA in a manner consistent with the formation of the well-known 1, 2 intrastrand DNA crosslink. However, when GSH is used as the reducing agent for 3 and 4, ((195))Pt NMR shows that cisplatin is not produced in the reaction medium. Although the Pt(II) products bind to closed circular DNA, their effect on the mobility of Form I DNA is different from that produced by cisplatin. When physiological carbonate is present in the reduction medium, ((13))C NMR shows that Pt(II) carbonato complexes form which block or impede platinum binding to DNA. The results of the study vis-à-vis the ability of the Pt(IV) complexes to act as prodrugs for cisplatin are discussed.