Background Patellar tendon ruptures commonly are repaired using transosseous patellar drill tunnels with modified-Krackow sutures in the patellar tendon. This simple suture technique has been associated with failure rates and poor clinical outcomes in a modest proportion of patients. Failure of this repair technique can result from gap formation during loading or a single catastrophic event. Several augmentation techniques have been described to improve the integrity of the repair, but standardized biomechanical evaluation of repair strength among different techniques is lacking. Questions/purposes The purpose of this study was to describe a novel figure-of-eight suture technique to augment traditional fixation and evaluate its biomechanical performance. We hypothesized that the augmentation technique would (1) reduce gap formation during cyclic loading and (2) increase the maximum load to failure. Methods Ten pairs (two male, eight female) of freshfrozen cadaveric knees free of overt disorders or patellar tendon damage were used (average donor age, 76 years; range, 65-87 years). For each pair, one specimen underwent the standard transosseous tunnel suture repair with a modified-Krackow suture technique and the second underwent the standard repair with our experimental augmentation method. Nine pairs were suitable for testing. Each specimen underwent cyclic loading while continuously measuring gap formation across the repair. At the completion of cyclic loading, load to failure testing was performed. Results A difference in gap formation and mean load to failure was seen in favor of the augmentation technique. At 250 cycles, a 68% increase in gap formation was seen for the control group (control: 5.96 ± 0.86 mm [95% CI, 5.30-6.62 mm]; augmentation: 3.55 ± 0.56 mm [95% CI, 3.12-3.98 mm]; p = 0.02). The mean load to failure was 13% greater in the augmentation group (control: 899.57 ± 96.94 N [95% CI, 825.06-974.09 N]; augmentation: 1030 augmentation: .70 ± 122.41 N [95% CI, 936.61-1124; p = 0.01). Conclusions This biomechanical study showed improved performance of a novel augmentation technique compared with the standard repair, in terms of reduced gap formation during cyclic loading and increased maximum load to failure. Clinical Relevance Decreased gap formation and higher load to failure may improve healing potential and minimize failure risk. This study shows a potential biomechanical advantage of the augmentation technique, providing support for future clinical investigations comparing this

Introduction Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has proven to be a reliable method to restore knee stability. However, the risk of physeal arrest with transphyseal tunnel placement in skeletally immature patients has raised concern regarding this technique. Conservative nonoperative management also has its limitations resulting in meniscal and chondral damage that may lead to degenerative joint disease and poor return to sport. Researchers have used animal models to study the threshold of physeal damage producing growth deformity. The purpose of this study was to examine the distal femoral and proximal tibial physes and determine the damage produced by drilling transphyseal tunnels. In addition, we attempted to find a reproducible angle at which to drill the tibial tunnel for safe interference screw placement. To do this, we used a custom software module. Methods A custom software package designed by our team was used: Module for Adolescent ACL Reconstructive Surgery (MAARS). This module created a 3-dimensional model of the distal femur and proximal tibia. The data required for MAARS were sagittal and coronal T1 magnetic resonance imagings of at least 1.5T. Thirty-one knee magnetic resonance imaging studies from patients aged 10 to 15 years old were used. The physes were segmented out to obtain volumetric measurements. Transphyseal tunnels were simulated based on the anatomic trajectory of the native ACL. The module calculated volume of physis was removed with the use of an 8-mm tunnel and the optimum angle for trajectory. Results Average volume of the tibial and femoral physis was 12,683.1 μL and 14,708.3 μL, respectively. The volume increased linearly with age. Average volume removed from the tibial and femoral physis was 318.4 μL and 306.29 μL, respectively. This represented 2.4% of the distal femoral physis and 2.5% of the proximal tibial physis. The volume percent removed decreased linearly with age. Manipulation of the variables demonstrates graft radius is the most critical parameter affecting the volume of physeal injury. Variation of graft diameter from 6 mm to 11 mm will increase volume percent removed from 2.3% to 7.8%, which averages 1.1% for every 1 mm increase. Increasing tunnel drill angle from 45 degrees to 70 degrees will decrease volume percent removed from 4.1% to 3.1% which averages 0.2% removed for each 5 degrees increase in drill angle. The average angle to maintain a distance of 20 mm from the proximal tibial physis was 65 degrees with a range of 40 degrees to 85 degrees. Discussion Less than 3% injury occurs when drilling an 8-mm tunnel across the physis. A vertical tunnel has minimal effect, but the tunnel diameter is critical. Interference screws can be placed safely to avoid the physis but requires careful planning. The MAARS module may be helpful in preoperative planning. Level of Evidence Diagnostic, level IV.

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.