There is great interest in expanding the use of ultrasound (US), but new challenges exist with its application to lumbar facet-targeted procedures. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the risk of incorrect needle placement associated with US-guided lumbar medial branch blocks (MBB) and facet joint injections (FJI) as confirmed by fluoroscopy or computerized tomography (CT). An a priori protocol was registered, and a database search was conducted. Inclusion criteria included all study types. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood tool for assessing risk bias for observational cohort studies. Pooled analysis of the risk difference (RD) of incorrect needle placement was calculated. Pooled analysis of 7 studies demonstrated an 11% RD (P , 0.0009) of incorrect needle placement for US-guided MBB confirmed using fluoroscopy with and without contrast. Pooled analysis of 3 studies demonstrated a 13% RD (P , 0.0001) of incorrect needle placement for US-guided FJI confirmed using CT. The time to complete a single-level MBB ranged from 2.6 to 5.0 minutes. The certainty of evidence was low to very low. Ultrasound-guided lumbar MBB and FJI are associated with a significant risk of incorrect needle placement when confirmed by fluoroscopy or CT. The technical limitations of US and individual patient factors could contribute to the risk of incorrect needle placement.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome. Although prior studies have explored the anatomic changes of the median nerve and carpal arch with different wrist deviations and positionings, the change in safe zone distance between the median nerve and ulnar artery with ulnar or radial wrist deviations has not been adequately investigated. Objective: To identify the optimal wrist positioning that increases the safe zone distance between the median nerve and ulnar artery using ultrasound in patients with CTS. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Quaternary medical center multidisciplinary outpatient hand clinic. Participants: Twenty five patients (41 wrists) with clinical CTS who received an electrodiagnostic study (EDX) to evaluate CTS within 1 year prior to enrollment. Interventions: Ultrasound-identified safe zone distance measurements were obtained in each patient between the ulnar aspect of the median nerve and the radial aspect of the ulnar artery with the wrist in neutral radial-ulnar deviation as well as in passive ulnar and radial deviation. Main Outcome Measure: The ultrasound-identified safe zone distance with the wrist in each of the three positions. Results: The interstructural safe zone distance was significantly greater when measured in the ulnarly deviated position (1.08 cm) compared with either the neutral (0.61cm, p < .001) or radially deviated positions (0.52 cm, p < .001). Interstructural safe zone distance did not differ between those with normal, mild, moderate, or severe classifications of pathology, or between dominant and nondominant limbs. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the ultrasound-measured interstructural safe zone distance was significantly greater in the ulnarly deviated position than in either the neutral position or radially deviated position. These findings may lead to improvement in the safety of ultrasound-guided injections.

No abstract

ObjectiveTo analyze the association between preoperative electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies and postoperative pain and functional outcomes following ulnar nerve decompression and/or transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE).Literature SurveyProtocol was submitted and database search was conducted by an experienced librarian of all available studies in the English language from 1990 to June 8, 2022. Databases included Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus.MethodologyInclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective longitudinal studies, and studies involving adults ≥18 years of age who underwent ulnar nerve decompression and/or transposition for UNE. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality of Assessment Tool. Certainty in evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A meta‐analysis was not performed.SynthesisA total of 289 studies were screened, and 8 retrospective cohort studies met inclusion criteria comprising 762 patients. A decreased or absent preoperative sensory nerve action potential amplitude (SNAP) showed significance with worse postoperative outcomes. The presence of preoperative conduction block showed significance in higher quality studies. There was limited evidence for slow preoperative motor conduction velocities or preoperative electromyography (EMG) abnormalities and postoperative outcomes. Overall quality assessment demonstrated that two studies had “good,” four “fair,” and two “poor” quality of evidence. Certainty in evidence was “low” due to risk of bias.ConclusionsA decreased or absent preoperative ulnar SNAP may predict worse postoperative outcomes. Per higher quality studies, preoperative conduction block at the elbow may also predict worse postoperative outcomes. Careful interpretation is required with a full understanding of the limited evidence, risk of bias, and low certainty in evidence to support the use of preoperative EDX to predict postoperative outcomes in UNE.

No abstract