Supported Lipid Bilayers (SLBs) are model membranes formed at solid substrate surfaces. This architecture renders the membrane experimentally accessible to surface sensitive techniques used to study their properties, including Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), optical fluorescence microscopy, Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) and X-Ray/Neutron Reflectometry, and allows integration with technology for potential biotechnological applications such as drug screening devices. The experimental technique often dictates substrate choice or treatment, and it is anecdotally recognised that certain substrates are suitable for the particular experiment, but the exact influence of the substrate has not been comprehensively investigated. Here, we study the behavior of a simple model bilayer, phase separating on a variety of commonly used substrates, including glass, mica, silicon and quartz, with drastically different results. The distinct micron scale domains observed on mica, identical to those seen in free-floating Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs), are reduced to nanometer scale domains on glass and quartz. The mechanism for the arrest of domain formation is investigated, and the most likely candidate is nanoscale surface 2 roughness, acting as a drag on the hydrodynamic motion of small domains during phase separation.Evidence was found that the physico-chemical properties of the surface have a mediating effect, most likely due to changes in the lubricating interstitial water layer between surface and bilayer.

The insecticidal effects of ω‐hexatoxin‐Hv1a, κ‐hexatoxin‐Hv1c and ω/κ‐hexatoxin‐Hv1h are currently attributed to action at calcium and potassium channels. By characterizing the binding of these toxins to neuronal membranes, we show that they have more potent effects as positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), consistent with their neuroexcitatory toxicology. Alanine scanning analysis of ω‐hexatoxin‐Hv1a reveals a structure–activity relationship for binding that mirrors that for insecticidal activity. Spinosyn A does not compete with ω‐hexatoxin‐Hv‐1a for binding, and we show that these two PAMs have distinct pharmacology of binding indicating that they act at different receptor populations. These toxins represent valuable tools for the characterization of insect nAChRs and for the development of more selective agrochemicals.

No abstract

Miscible blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene polymers are assembled through triple hydrogen bonding between complementary ureidoimidazole and amidoisocytosine heterodimers.

Whilst many classes of insecticides target the insect central nervous system (CNS), their effects in the CNS of pest aphids have not been demonstrated. In this report, we describe an electrophysiological method for recording spontaneous neuronal activity from the giant willow aphid (Tuberolachnus salignus). Using extracellular recording electrodes and two analysis methods (threshold and template search), spontaneous spike activity was shown to exhibit sensitivity to the neuroexcitatory insecticide imidacloprid. This method allows changes in the frequency of action-potentials to be monitored during direct bath exposure to chemical agents, enabling a means of assessing and comparing neurotoxic effects of insecticides in a previously inaccessible superfamily of pest insects.