Colistin emerged in the last decade as a savior for the treatment of critically septic patients who suffer MDR-GNB infections. This development came in time with the drying new antibacterial pipelines. MDR-GNB became problematic in ICU's including MDR Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaecae (CPE). With the resurgence of wide colistin prescription especially in ICU's, awareness on when to switch to this reintroduced drug is required. Recently, it is observed that there are differences between the past dosages and the currently proposed dosages. Nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are observed to be less than what was published in the past. This may be due to more pure preparations and attention to other drug therapies that are employed in the critically ill patients residing the ICU's. However,randomized control studies are still lacking to shed light on its efficacy and safety. Agreement is still looming on dosages, and monotherapy of colistin versus its combination with other agents.
Studies disputed the use of tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, retrospective studies and one interventional study from the RECOVER study supported tocilizumab use, however, many other interventional and a retrospective propensity score-matched studies did not find a benefit from its use, in contrast, increased mortality was demonstrated, this study aims to add knowledge on this topic. Records for 1124 COVID-19 admitted patients were reviewed. Patients were recruited from three participating hospitals. Characteristics of all-cohort and propensity score-adjusted (PSadjusted) patients were described, data was analyzed as propensity score matching (PSM) and a stabilized inverted probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW). Management of patients was up to the treating physicians who varied in the treatment approach., the effect difference was estimated by χ2. Further, the study was analyzed as logistic regression to assure robustness of the inferred outcomes; recovery, need for home oxygen, and all-cause mortality. All-cause mortality for patients was 12.7% (143) and in ICU was 54.0% (128). In the all-cohort, there was an increase of patients' recovery in controls; 39.6% versus tocilizumab 9.9% (P<0.000). The need for home oxygen was more in tocilizumab; 59.2%, controls 38.6% (P<0.000). Mortality was higher in tocilizumab than the controls (25.4% versus 10.9%, P<0.000). Analyses as PSM-adjustment and SIPTW continued to demonstrate significantly less recovery and more mortality with using tocilizumab (P ≤ 0.002), but tocilizumab and the control did not differ significantly for the need for home oxygen therapy (49.1% vs. 48.6% respectively, P=0.945). No benefit was seen for tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, quite the opposite, it showed no recovery benefit, increased mortality, and did not impact the need for home oxygen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.