The treatment and monitoring of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) has been a major challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a survey, we investigated the influence of COVID-19 on the care of NET patients in the German speaking countries Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The multidisciplinarity of all treating physicians in the outpatient and inpatient sector was reflected in our survey. Furthermore, we were able to present findings pertaining to the university and non-university medical care. Overall, only a minority of appointments were cancelled, mostly as a result of medical prioritization and less for fear of infection by patients. In the university sector, longer delays for diagnostic measures were observed in comparison to non-university care. During the COVID-19 crisis, NET patients rarely changed their current therapy, but the pandemic impacted the assessment of the different treatment modalities at risk of developing severe COVID-19 disease. This survey provides the first real-world data on the treatment of NET patients from the physicians’ perspective during the COVID-19 crisis. Despite delays in diagnostic procedures and outpatient appointments, only a minority of physicians foresee a major impact of COVID-19 on NET patient care.
Background Respiratory failure worsens the outcome of acute pancreatitis (AP) and underlying factors might be early detectable. Aims To evaluate the prevalence and prognostic relevance of early pleuropulmonary pathologies and pre-existing chronic lung diseases (CLD) in AP patients. Methods Multicentre retrospective cohort study. Caudal sections of the thorax derived from abdominal contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) performed in the early phase of AP were assessed. Independent predictors of severe AP were identified by binary logistic regression analysis. A one-year survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test was performed. Results 358 patients were analysed, finding pleuropulmonary pathologies in 81%. CECTs were performed with a median of 2 days (IQR 1–3) after admission. Multivariable analysis identified moderate to severe or bilateral pleural effusions (PEs) (OR = 4.16, 95%CI 2.05–8.45, p<0.001) and pre-existing CLD (OR = 2.93, 95%CI 1.17–7.32, p = 0.022) as independent predictors of severe AP. Log rank test showed a significantly worse one-year survival in patients with bilateral compared to unilateral PEs in a subgroup. Conclusions Increasing awareness of the prognostic impact of large and bilateral PEs and pre-existing CLD could facilitate the identification of patients at high risk for severe AP in the early phase and thus improve their prognosis.
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic challenges health care systems worldwide. In this situation, guidelines for health care professionals in endoscopy units with increased risk of infection from inhalation of airborne droplets, conjunctival contact and faeces are urgently needed. Recently, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the German Society for Pneumology (DGP) issued recommendations. However, real-world data on the conditions and requirements of endoscopy units to adhere to this guidance are missing. Design: We conducted an internet-based survey among German endoscopy units from all levels of care from April 1st to 7th, 2020. The survey comprised 33 questions and was distributed electronically by the German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) and the DGP. Results: In total, 656 endoscopy units completed the survey. Overall, 253 units (39%) cancelled fewer than 40% of their procedures. Of note, private practices cancelled less procedures than hospital-based units. Complete separation of high-risk and COVID-19 positive patients was achieved in only 20% of the units. Procedural measures were well adopted, with 91% of the units systematically identifying patients at risk and 85% using risk-adapted personal protective equipment (PPE). For the future, shortages in PPE (81%), staff (69%) and relevant financial losses (77%) were expected. Conclusion: Concise definitions of non-urgent, elective interventions and endoscopic surveillance strategies are needed to better guide endoscopic activity and intervention cancellations. In the short term, a lack of PPE can constitute considerable impairment of endoscopy units' operability and patient outcomes.
Zusammenfassung Einleitung Die COVID-19-Pandemie stellt die Gesundheitssysteme weltweit vor eine große Herausforderung. Aktuelle Daten deuten auf ein erhöhtes Risiko für eine SARS-CoV-2-Infektion für das Endoskopiepersonal hin. Für gastrointestinale Endoskopieeinheiten wurden mehrere Empfehlungen für die aktuelle Situation formuliert, jedoch liegen bislang keine Daten zur momentanen Versorgungsrealität vor. Material und Methodik Vom 1. bis 7. April 2020 erfolgte eine deutschlandweite, webbasierte Umfrage unter den Mitgliedern der DGVS. Insgesamt wurden 33 Fragen gestellt, die auf Empfehlungen der ESGE (European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) basierten. Die Umfrage war an die Leiter von Endoskopieeinheiten gerichtet. Ergebnisse Von 551 teilnehmenden Endoskopieeinheiten stornierten 37 % (202) weniger als 40 % ihrer Eingriffe. Kleinere Abteilungen (< 4000 Untersuchungen/Jahr) sagten einen signifikant geringeren Anteil ihrer Untersuchungen ab als größere (> 4000). Eine vollständige räumliche Trennung von Hochrisikopatienten war nur in 17 % der Fälle möglich. Prozedurale Maßnahmen wie strukturierte Risikostratifikation (91 %) oder Verwendung persönlicher Schutzausrüstung (PSA, 85 %) wurden meist umgesetzt. Für die Zukunft wurden Engpässe bei PSA (83 %) und Personal (69 %) sowie relevante finanzielle Verluste (80 %) erwartet. Schlussfolgerungen Die Empfehlungen zu den strukturellen Maßnahmen waren nur eingeschränkt umsetzbar, und der Umfang von Stornierungen war heterogen. Eindeutige Definitionen notwendiger Endoskopien in der Pandemiesituation und eine Anpassung struktureller Gegebenheiten sowie eine finanzielle Absicherung erscheinen notwendig.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.