SignificanceThe only known homeostatic regulator of fat mass is the leptin system. We hypothesized that there is a second homeostat regulating body weight with an impact on fat mass. In this study we have added and removed weight loads from experimental animals and measured the effects on the biological body weight. The results demonstrate that there is a body weight homeostat that regulates fat mass independently of leptin. As the body weight-reducing effect of increased loading was dependent on osteocytes, we propose that there is a sensor for body weight in the long bones of the lower extremities acting as “body scales.” This is part of a body weight homeostat, “gravitostat,” that keeps body weight and body fat mass constant.

Leptin has been the only known homeostatic regulator of fat mass, but we recently found evidence for a second one, named the gravitostat. In the current study, we compared the effects of leptin and increased loading (gravitostat stimulation) on fat mass in mice with different levels of body weight (lean, overweight, and obese). Leptin infusion suppressed body weight and fat mass in lean mice given normal chow but not in overweight or obese mice given a high-fat diet for 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. The maximum effect of leptin on body weight and fat mass was obtained already at <44 ng/mL of serum leptin. Increased loading using intraperitoneal capsules with different weights decreased body weight in overweight and obese mice. Although the implantation of an empty capsule reduced the body weight in lean mice, only a nonsignificant tendency of a specific effect of increased loading was observed in the lean mice. These findings demonstrate that the gravitostat regulates fat mass in obese mice, whereas leptin regulates fat mass only in lean mice with low endogenous serum leptin levels. We propose that activation of the gravitostat primarily protects against obesity, whereas low levels of leptin protect against undernutrition.

Researchers from diverse disciplines, including organismal and cellular physiology, sports science, human nutrition, evolution and ecology, have sought to understand the causes and consequences of the surprising variation in metabolic rate found among and within individual animals of the same species. Research in this area has been hampered by differences in approach, terminology and methodology, and the context in which measurements are made. Recent advances provide important opportunities to identify and address the key questions in the field. By bringing together researchers from different areas of biology and biomedicine, we describe and evaluate these developments and the insights they could yield, highlighting the need for more standardisation across disciplines. We conclude with a list of important questions that can now be addressed by developing a common conceptual and methodological toolkit for studies on metabolic variation in animals.

Both fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), by binding to FGF receptors (FGFRs), and activation of the gravitostat, by artificial loading, decrease the body weight (BW). Previous studies demonstrate that both the FGF system and loading have the capacity to regulate BW independently of leptin. The aim of the current study was to determine the possible interactions between the effect of increased loading and the FGF system for the regulation of BW. We observed that the BW-reducing effect of increased loading was abolished in mice treated with a monoclonal antibody directed against FGFR1c, suggesting interactions between the two systems. As serum levels of endocrine FGF21 and hepatic FGF21 mRNA were increased in the loaded mice compared with the control mice, we first evaluated the loading response in FGF21 over expressing mice with constant high FGF21 levels. Leptin treatment, but not increased loading, decreased the BW in the FGF21-overexpressing mice, demonstrating that specifically the loading effect is attenuated in the presence of high activity in the FGF system. However, as FGF21 knockout mice displayed a normal loading response on BW, FGF21 is neither mediating nor essential for the loading response. In conclusion, the BW-reducing effect of increased loading but not of leptin treatment is blocked by high activity in the FGF system. We propose that both the gravitostat and the FGF system regulate BW independently of leptin and that pharmacologically enhanced activity in the FGF system reduces the sensitivity of the gravitostat.

List of non-standard abbreviations CGRP-calcitonin gene related peptide Ex4-exendin-4 GDF15-growth and differentiation factor 15 GFRAL-GDNF family receptor alpha-like GLP-1-glucagon like peptide 1 GLP-1R-glucagon like peptide 1 receptor IL-6Rα-interleukin-6 receptor alpha MIC1-macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 NTS-nucleus of the solitary tract PBN-parabrachial nucleus PBNel-external lateral parabrachial nucleus RFP-red fluorescent protein STAT3-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3