Until recently it was thought that age greater than 35 yr was the main risk factor for the development of drug-induced hepatitis (DIH) in patients receiving antituberculosis therapy. We conducted a study to determine whether infection with either the hepatitis C virus or the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were significant risk factors for the development of DIH in patients receiving antituberculosis therapy. Our study consisted of two parts. In the first part, 134 consecutive patients admitted for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) were followed for the development of DIH. All of these patients were also screened for the presence of hepatitis C and HIV. In the second part of the study, those patients who were hepatitis C positive and who developed DIH on repeated reintroduction of the anti-TB drugs were offered a liver biopsy. If active inflammation, which may be suggestive of hepatitis C infection, was present on the biopsy specimen, treatment with alpha-interferon was begun and the anti-TB drugs were subsequently reintroduced. During the 18 mo of the study, 22 patients developed DIH. The relative risk of developing DIH if the patient was hepatitis C or HIV positive was fivefold and fourfold, respectively (p < 0.05). If a patient was coinfected with both hepatitis C and HIV the relative risk of developing DIH was increased 14.4-fold (p < 0.002). In the treatment part, four patients were treated with alpha-interferon, and all were able to undergo the reintroduction of anti-TB therapy without reoccurrence of DIH. Infection with hepatitis C and HIV are independent and additive risk factors for the development of DIH during TB therapy. The treatment of hepatitis C with alpha-interferon may allow the reintroduction of anti-TB agents in those who previously developed DIH when exposed to these drugs.
Inhaled heparin has been shown to inhibit allergic bronchoconstriction in sheep that develop only acute responses to antigen (acute responders) but was ineffective in sheep that develop both acute and late airway responses (LAR) (dual responders). Because the antiallergic activity of heparin is molecular-weight dependent, we hypothesized that heparin-derived oligosaccharides (<2, 500) with potential anti-inflammatory activity may attenuate the LAR in the dual-responder sheep. Specific lung resistance was measured in 24 dual-responder sheep before and serially for 8 h after challenge with Ascaris suum antigen for demonstration of early airway response (EAR) and LAR, without and after treatment with inhaled medium-, low-, and ultralow-molecular-weight (ULMW) heparins and "non-anticoagulant" fractions (NAF) of heparin. Airway responsiveness was estimated before and 24 h postantigen as the cumulative provocating dose of carbachol that increased specific lung resistance by 400%. Only ULMW heparins caused a dose-dependent inhibition of antigen-induced EAR and LAR and postantigen airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), whereas low- and medium-molecular-weight heparins were ineffective. The effects of ULMW heparin and ULMW NAF-heparin were comparable and inhibited the LAR and AHR even when administered "after" the antigen challenge. The ULMW NAF-heparin failed to inhibit the bronchoconstrictor response to histamine, carbachol, and leukotriene D(4), excluding a direct effect on airway smooth muscle. In six sheep, segmental antigen challenge caused a marked increase in bronchoalveolar lavage histamine, which was not prevented by inhaled ULMW NAF-heparin. The results of this study in the dual-responder sheep demonstrate that 1) the antiallergic activity of inhaled "fractionated" heparins is molecular-weight dependent, 2) only ULMW heparins inhibit the antigen-induced EAR and LAR and postantigen AHR, and 3) the antiallergic activity is mediated by nonanticoagulant fractions and resides in the ULMW chains of <2,500.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.