The author argues that one of the main functions of perverse relatedness is to induce the analyst into becoming the patient's unconscious accomplice in a "perverse pact" against the analytic work aimed at disavowing intolerable aspects of reality. The intense power of collusive induction in perverse relating leads the analyst to participate in transference-countertransference enactments and to the crystallization of a silent and chronic unconscious collusion between the patient and analyst in the analytic field, stagnating the process (bastion; Baranger and Baranger). The author claims that analysis of perverse pathology should not be limited to interpretation of the patient's intrapsychic functioning but should also focus on the information obtained by the analyst through his participation in collusive enactments; the analyst should also take a "second look" at the analytic "field" to detect underlying bastions. The author reviews the main psychoanalytic contributions that have clarified the phenomenon of collusive induction in perverse relating and as an illustration, describes the analysis of a man with a perverse character; in this patient, one of the main functions of his perverse relatedness was to induce the analyst to become an accomplice in his disavowal of his terror of death. The author highlights the influence of death anxiety in the bastions that develop in the treatment of perverse patients.
object loss may be very different in a nervous system that has experienced a nine-month gestation in contrast to weeks-long gestation.2Taylor has performed a monumental and unique task in reviewing the evolution of the formulations of psychosomatic medicine, psychoanalysis, and their interrelations. H e has attempted to bring both fields u p to date by incorporating new knowledge and then conceptualizing an expanded, integrated, more encompassing model of disease: psychobiological disregulation. This multifaceted, nonlinear, developmental, and multicausal model has been skillfully constructed from a scholarly review o f the literature. Furthermore, from the data Taylor presents, it is possible to understand how h e constructed and supports his formulations. I am sure that the author would agree that it is important that these new theories be the source of testable hypotheses that will be subjected to rigorous scienfific inquiry in order to improve the psychological, social, and biological well-being of the physically ill. REFERENCES FREUD, A. (1972). The widening scope of psychoanalytic child psychology, normal and abnormal. . Type of behavior and mortality from SiriiosTox, 0. C. k SmosTos, S. S. (1975). Belief systems and management STEIS. AI., SCIIIA\'I, R. C. S: LUPARELLO, T. J. (1969). Tlie hypotlialamus and coronary heart disease. h'ew Eng. J. Aled., 3 18:65-69.of emotional aspects of malignancy.
No abstract
L’auteur de cet article soutient que l’une des principales fonctions de la relation perverse est de pousser l’analyste à devenir le complice inconscient du patient par un « pacte pervers » dirigé contre le travail analytique et visant à dénier les aspects intolérables de la réalité. L’intensité de la force d’induction collusoire de la relation perverse conduit l’analyste à participer à des énactions transféro-contre-transférentielles ainsi qu’à la cristallisation d’une collusion silencieuse et chronique entre le patient et l’analyste dans le champ analytique aboutissant à la stagnation du processus ( cf . Le « bastion », Baranger et Baranger). L’auteur affirme que l’analyse de la pathologie perverse ne doit pas se limiter à la seule interprétation du fonctionnement intrapsychique du patient, mais également prendre en compte les informations obtenues par l’analyste dans sa participation aux énactions collusoires. L’analyste doit donc jeter également un « regard second » sur le « champ » analytique, à la recherche de bastions sous-jacents. L’auteur passe en revue les principales contributions psychanalytiques ayant éclairé le phénomène d’induction collusoire dans la relation perverse avant de l’illustrer en décrivant l’analyse d’un patient à la personnalité perverse. Pour ce patient, l’une des principales fonctions de son mode de relation pervers était d’amener l’analyste à devenir complice de son déni de la terreur de la mort. L’auteur souligne l’influence qu’exerce l’angoisse de mort sur le développement des bastions dans le traitement des patients pervers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.