If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -The purpose of this paper is to present the improvement gap analysis (IGA), a simple method to direct improvement opportunities in services that overcomes limitations of the traditional IPA regarding excitement and basic attributes. Design/methodology/approach -The proposed method is theoretically developed and simulated. The theoretical simulation explains why IGA overcomes limitations of the traditional importance performance analysis (IPA) and how it could identify the impact of excitement innovative attributes. A case study with 287 customers of supermarkets was used to empirically test IGA and compare it to IPA. Findings -The case study confirmed that the traditional IPA may lead to wrong improvement decisions for basic and excitement attributes. It happens because IPA is based on current attributes' performance and considers the relationship between attribute performance and customer satisfaction as a linear one. Also, it cannot identify the impact of excitement innovative attributes on customer satisfaction. Using only information about the company's customers, IGA could differentiate neutral from excitement attributes in the case study and, differently from IPA, it correctly identified improvement decisions for basic and excitement attributes. Research limitations/implications -Although IGA can theoretically distinguish between excitement innovative and neutral attributes, the case study presented in the paper did not test any innovative attribute. All attributes were already experimented or known by the subjects. Future research should empirically test IGA's real capability to identify excitement innovative attributes. Practical implications -Managers should be aware that IPA may lead to wrong improvement decisions. It may leave excitement attributes unnoticed or direct the company to the improvement of basic attributes that already have adequate performance. IGA can be a good substitute for IPA with the additional advantage that it does not need information about competitors in the analysis. Also, since service quality evaluation depends heavily on customer perception, IGA is particularly suitable to this industry, but it could also be used for product improv...
Purpose This paper aims to analyze the influence of gender diversity on the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate governance (CG) and economic and financial performance of Brazilian publicly traded companies. Design/methodology/approach The sample comprises 68 non-financial public companies comprising the IBX100 index of BM&FBOVESPA. For that, it was used panel data modeling, correlation and ranking by TOPSIS method. Findings The results suggest a significant relationship between CG and economic–financial performance when mediated by gender diversity. This relationship was not observed between CSR and economic–financial performance. Thus, it can be concluded that in a diversified board of directors, in terms of gender, better monitoring of managers can occur because of the increase in their independence in decisions, as well as performance increase. These results diverge from the literature on the influence of women’s participation in corporate boards in CSR. It is assumed that this result is because of the fact that the participation of women is recent in Brazil. Research limitations/implications The main limitations are the number of companies analyzed, the choice of ISE index to verify the CSR variable and the metric used to verify the CG mechanisms. Originality/value In general, this research contributes to the literature of the area, especially in Brazil, in confirming that the mediating variable gender diversity makes the relationship between CG and performance more significant.
This paper compares how two different versions of Importance-performance analysis (IPA) and Improvement-gaps analysis (IGA), which is a fusion of the Kano model with IPA, assess the possible impact of incremental innovations on customer satisfaction. A total of 303 users of a health diagnosis service answered questions regarding 21 service attributes, of which three were incremental innovations at the time of research. The results confirm that diagonal IPA overcomes the limitations of the original IPA due to the high correlation of the stated importance with customer satisfaction. However, it also shows that diagonal IPA and traditional IPA are unable to identify which incremental innovations should/could be offered. The present research shows that IGA overcomes not only the problems of original IPA, but also those of both IPA methods regarding the identification of the possible impact of incremental innovations on customer satisfaction. It is a simple method to be used by managers and practitioners. Furthermore, this paper shows that using the expected dissatisfaction of customers represents a different way to evaluate attributes' importance.
As organizações estão inseridas em um ambiente competitivo no qual a melhoria contínua dos seus produtos auxilia a manter ou incrementar novos negócios. Nesse processo, é relevante ouvir o cliente, pois é ele quem decide se o produto ou serviço será utilizado ou não, sendo então essencial conhecer os atributos do produto que intensificam o nível de satisfação dos clientes. Este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar o método de análise do contraste da penalidade e da recompensa (Penalty and Reward Contrast analysis - PRC), que identifica atributos relevantes na influência da satisfação do consumidor. Para ilustrar o método PRC, realizou-se uma pesquisa avaliando 16 atributos de supermercados, com uma amostra de 290 respondentes. O resultado da pesquisa revela que a análise do contraste da penalidade e da recompensa apresenta os atributos que influenciam a satisfação geral, mas descarta atributos que os consumidores não têm experiência de utilização, entre eles, os inovadores.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.