The surgical learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy performed by recently graduated fellowship-trained surgeons with little or no experience in endoscopic surgery showed excellent results compared with those in a large series of more experienced surgeons.

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores on postoperative complication rates and total hospital charges following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.All patients (n = 664) underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. A group of patients with an ASA score of 1 or 2 (n = 575) and a group of patients with an ASA score of 3 (n = 89) were compared.The mean age was higher in the group of patients with an ASA score of 3 than in the group of patients with an ASA score of 1 or 2 (70 vs 67 years). The rate of ICU admission (27% vs 15%) was higher in the ASA score 3 group. The mean hospital stay (14 vs 12 days) was longer in the ASA score 3 group. Postoperative 30-day complications (38% vs 27%), 30-day mortality (2% vs 0%), and a Clavien-Dindo classification of ≥3 (21% vs 11%) occurred more frequently in the ASA score 3 group. Mean total hospital charges were significantly higher in the ASA score 3 group (13,906 vs 11,575 USD). Independent risk factors that affected postoperative complications were older age [≥80 years, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.8], an ASA score of 3 (HR = 1.6), and the presence of a primary rectal tumor (HR = 1.6). Postoperative complication rates were 21.9%, 28.5%, and 38.2% in the ASA score 1, 2, and 3 groups, respectively. Total hospital charges were 14,376 USD and 10,877 USD in the groups with and without postoperative complications, respectively. Mean total hospital charges were 10,769 USD, 11,756 USD, and 13,906 USD in the ASA score 1, 2, and 3 groups, respectively.Preoperative ASA scores may be a predictor of postoperative complications and hospital costs when planning laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

The extent of thyroid surgery for patients with low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), with a primary tumour <4 cm and no extrathyroidal extension (ETE) or lymph node (LN) metastases, has shifted in a more conservative direction. However, clinicopathological risk factors, including microscopic ETE, aggressive histology, vascular invasion in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and intermediate volume of LN metastases, can only be identified after completing thyroid lobectomy. It is controversial whether patients with these risk factors should immediately undergo complete thyroidectomy and/or radioactive iodine remnant ablation or should be monitored without further treatments. Data are conflicting about the prognostic impact of these risk factors on clinical DTC outcomes. Notably, the recurrence rate in patients who underwent thyroid lobectomy is low and the few recurrences that develop during long-term follow-up can readily be detected by neck ultrasonography and treated by salvage surgery with no impact on survival. These findings suggest that a more conservative approach may be a preferred management strategy over immediate completion surgery, despite a slightly higher risk of structural recurrence. Regarding follow-up of post-lobectomy DTC patients, it is reasonable that an initial risk stratification system based on clinicohistological findings be used to guide the short-term follow-up prior to evaluating the response to initial therapy and that the dynamic risk stratification system based on the response to initial therapy be used to guide long-term follow-up.

PET has low sensitivity for HCC. However, it is useful to predict treatment outcomes after liver resection or liver transplantation for HCC. Although the extent of liver resection must be decided based on liver function, a resection margin size >1 cm may improve DFS and OS in patients with PET-positive HCC.