been more encouraging. The trial should therefore not be regarded as a definitive dismissal of the promise of these or related agents. 3 Theoretically, depression in bipolar disorder is a more heterogeneous construct than mania, which is more monothematically biological in its causation. Depression is driven by a far wider array and admixture of biological factors, consequences of behaviours while manic, losses in domains such as educational and vocational horizons, relationships, personality, finances, guilt, stigma, and self-stigma, among others. Therefore, it is arguably ambitious at the outset to expect a singular biological therapy targeting one biological marker of the disorder to address all phenotypes of this heterogeneous clinical presentation. The complexity of bipolar depression might be an explanation more broadly for the relatively common failure of singular treatment approaches. These failures suggest that polyvalent and personalised therapies predicated on individualised profiles are needed to select from the diverse pharmacological, neurostimulatory, nutraceutical, lifestyle, and psychological approaches that are available. 10 In sum, this might not be the last word on the potential role of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of bipolar depression, but notwithstanding the methodological issues that accompany any clinical trial, the promise of targeting the inflammation pathway in the management of this challenging condition is today somewhat weaker.

No abstract

Background The World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 to be an international pandemic in March 2020. While numbers of new confirmed cases of the disease and death tolls are rising at an alarming rate on a daily basis, there is concern that the pandemic and the measures taken to counteract it could cause an increase in distress among the public. Hence, there could be an increase in need for emotional support within the population, which is complicated further by the reduction of existing face-to-face mental health services as a result of measures taken to limit the spread of the virus. Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic has had any influence on the calls made to Samaritans Ireland, a national crisis helpline within the Republic of Ireland. Methods This study presents an analysis of calls made to Samaritans Ireland in a four-week period before the first confirmed case of COVID-19 (calls=41,648, callers=3752) and calls made to the service within a four-week period after a restrictive lockdown was imposed by the government of the Republic of Ireland (calls=46,043, callers=3147). Statistical analysis was conducted to explore any differences between the duration of calls in the two periods at a global level and at an hourly level. We performed k-means clustering to determine the types of callers who used the helpline based on their helpline call usage behavior and to assess the impact of the pandemic on the caller type usage patterns. Results The analysis revealed that calls were of a longer duration in the postlockdown period in comparison with the pre–COVID-19 period. There were changes in the behavior of individuals in the cluster types defined by caller behavior, where some caller types tended to make longer calls to the service in the postlockdown period. There were also changes in caller behavior patterns with regard to the time of day of the call; variations were observed in the duration of calls at particular times of day, where average call durations increased in the early hours of the morning. Conclusions The results of this study highlight the impact of COVID-19 on a national crisis helpline service. Statistical differences were observed in caller behavior between the prelockdown and active lockdown periods. The findings suggest that service users relied on crisis helpline services more during the lockdown period due to an increased sense of isolation, worsening of underlying mental illness due to the pandemic, and reduction or overall removal of access to other support resources. Practical implications and limitations are discussed.

No abstract

Recently, there has been activity at public locations where people have died by suicide, including the erection of suicide prevention messages and memorials (decorations). This research looks at the impact of these decorations and associated media coverage of the decorations on suicidal behaviour at bridges. Incidents (n = 160) of suicidal behaviour on 26 bridges across motorways in England were analysed. Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of incidents pre‐decoration versus post‐decoration (p‐value = .55). The incident rates were not significantly different pre‐ and post‐decoration (p = .46). Only one bridge had statistically significantly more incidents post‐decoration and media reporting (p = .03). However, following correction for multiple testing there was no significant difference in pre‐ and post‐incident rates at any of the bridges. In total, 58% of bridges had a greater frequency of incidents when decorations were absent; however, this proportion was not statistically significant (p = .41). Further research is required to establish how suicide prevention messages are perceived. There does not appear to be any benefit, but it often generates media coverage which has been shown to increase risk.