It is nearly axiomatic that audiovisual (AV) speech is more intelligible than audio-only (A-only) speech, particularly when the speech is presented in a challenging listening environment, such as in background noise [e.g., MacLeod and Summerfield, Br. J. Audiol., 2 (1987)]. No previous research on audiovisual speech perception has examined the perception of children’s speech. Children may elicit a smaller AV benefit than adults, as their visual articulatory movements are more variable than adults’ [e.g., Smith and Goffman, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 41 (1998)], and hence are less informative perceptual cues. Alternatively, the overall lower intelligibility of children’s A-only speech might lead them to elicit overall higher AV benefits than adults. To examine this question, we collected developmentally appropriate sentence productions from five, 4-6 year old children, and five sex-matched adults. Ongoing work is examining the intelligibility of these sentences in multitalker babble in A-only and AV conditions in a variety of signal-to-noise ratios, so that we can compare AV benefits for children and adults when A-only intelligibility is matched. Both sentence intelligibility and eye gaze during perception are being measured. Results will help us understand the role of individual-speaker variation on the magnitude of AV benefit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.