Objective: Movement efficiency can be quantified during physical tasks by measuring the rate of change of acceleration (jerk). Jerk captures the smoothness of a motion and has been used to quantify movement for upper extremity and torso-based tasks. We collected triaxial accelerometer data during four physical tasks commonly performed in the work place to determine if jerk increases with physiologic strain.Methods: Participants completed a circuit of activities that mimicked the demands of manual labor in hot (40°C) and temperate (18°C) conditions. The circuit included walking on a treadmill carrying a load on the shoulder, lifting objects from the floor to the table, using a dead blow to strike the end of a heavy steel beam, and a kneeling rope pull. After the 9 min circuit, the participant had a standing rest for 1 min before repeating the circuit 3 additional times. Participants were instrumented with four 3-axis accelerometers (Actigraph wGT3X) secured to the torso, wrist, and upper arm.Results: There were 20 trials in the hot condition and 12 trials in the temperate condition. Heart rate and core body temperature increased during both protocols (p < 0.001). Measures of jerk varied by accelerometer location and activity. During treadmill walking, the wrist, torso, arm accelerometers measured higher jerk during the fourth circuit in the hot condition. During the lifting task, mean jerk increased in the hot condition in all accelerometers. Max jerk increased in the temperate condition in the arm accelerometer and jerk cost increased in the hot condition in the torso and arm accelerometers.Conclusions: Forty minutes of paced work performed in the heat resulted in increased acceleration and jerk in accelerometers placed on the torso, arm, and wrist. The accelerometers most consistently reporting these changes were task specific and suggest that a limited number of worn sensors could identify the onset of fatigue and increased injury risk.
Introduction: Pre-dive altitude exposure may increase respiratory fatigue and subsequently augment exercise ventilation at depth. This study examined pre-dive altitude exposure and the efficacy of resistance respiratory muscle training (RMT) on respiratory fatigue while diving at altitude. Methods: Ten men (26±5 years; V̇O2peak: 39.8±3.3 mL•kg-1•min-1) performed three dives; one control (ground level) and two simulated altitude dives (3,658 m) to 17 msw, relative to ground level, before and after four weeks of resistance RMT. Subjects performed pulmonary function testing (e.g., inspiratory [PI] and expiratory [PE] pressure testing) pre- and post-RMT and during dive visits. During each dive, subjects exercised for 18 minutes at 55% V̇O2peak, and ventilation (V̇ E), breathing frequency (ƒb,), tidal volume (VT) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured. Results: Pre-dive altitude exposure reduced PI before diving (p=0.03), but had no effect on exercise V̇E, ƒb, or VT at depth. At the end of the dive in the pre-RMT condition, RPE was lower (p=0.01) compared to control. RMT increased PI and PE (p<0.01). PE was reduced from baseline after diving at altitude (p<0.03) and this was abated after RMT. RMT did not improve V̇E or VT at depth, but decreased ƒb (p=0.01) and RPE (p=0.048) during the final minutes of exercise. Conclusion: Acute altitude exposure pre- and post-dive induces decrements in PI and PE before and after diving, but does not seem to influence ventilation at depth. RMT reduced ƒb and RPE during exercise at depth, and may be useful to reduce work of breathing and respiratory fatigue during dives at altitude.
Purpose: In a disabled submarine scenario, a pressurized rescue module (PRM) may be deployed to rescue survivors. If the PRM were to become disabled, conditions could become hot and humid exposing the occupants to heat stress. We tested the hypothesis that the rise in core temperature and fluid loss from sweating would increase with rising dry bulb temperature. Methods: Twelve males (age 22 ± 3 years; height 179 ± 7 cm; mass 77.4 ± 8.3 kg) completed this study. On three occasions, subjects were exposed to high humidity and either 28-, 32-, or 35˚C for six hours in a dry hyperbaric chamber pressurized to 6.1 msw. Changes in core temperature (Tc) and body mass were recorded and linear regression lines fit to estimate the predicted rise in Tc and loss of fluid from sweating. Results: Heart rate was higher in the 35˚C condition compared to the 28˚C and 32˚C conditions. Tc was higher in the 32˚C condition compared to 28˚C and higher in 35˚C compared to the 28˚C and 32˚C conditions. Projected fluid loss in all of the tested conditions could exceed 6% of body mass after 24 hours of exposure endangering the health of sailors in a DISSUB or disabled PRM. A fluid intake of 1.0 to 3.5 L would be required to limit dehydration to 2% or 4% of initial mass depending upon condition. Conclusion: Prolonged exposure to 35˚C conditions under pressure results in uncompensable heat stress. 32˚C and 35˚C exposures were compensable under these conditions but further research is required to elucidate the effect of increased ambient pressure on thermoregulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.