The recent rapid increase in the prevalence of emerging tobacco- and nicotine-containing products, such as e-cigarettes, is being driven in part by their reduced-risk potential compared to tobacco smoking. In this study, we examined emission levels for selected cigarette smoke constituents, so-called "Hoffmann analytes", and in vitro toxicity of aerosol from a novel tobacco vapor product (NTV). The NTV thermally vaporizes a nicotine-free carrier liquid to form an aerosol which then passes through tobacco, where it absorbs tobacco-derived flavors and nicotine. The NTV results were compared with those for 3R4F cigarette smoke. Chemical analysis of the NTV aerosol demonstrated that Hoffmann analyte levels were substantially lower than in 3R4F smoke and that the most were below quantifiable levels. Results from in vitro bacterial reverse mutation, micronucleus and neutral red uptake assays showed that, in contrast with 3R4F smoke, the NTV aerosol failed to demonstrate any measurable genotoxicity or cytotoxicity. The temperature of tobacco during NTV use was measured at approximately 30 °C, which may explain the lower Hoffmann analyte emission and in vitro toxicity levels. These results suggest that the aerosol from the NTV has a very different toxicological profile when compared with combustible cigarette smoke.
New approach methodologies (NAMs) are increasingly being used for regulatory decision making by agencies worldwide because of their potential to reliably and efficiently produce information that is fit for purpose while reducing animal use. This article summarizes the ability to use NAMs for the assessment of human health effects of industrial chemicals and pesticides within the United States, Canada, and European Union regulatory frameworks. While all regulations include some flexibility to allow for the use of NAMs, the implementation of this flexibility varies across product type and regulatory scheme. This article provides an overview of various agencies’ guidelines and strategic plans on the use of NAMs, and specific examples of the successful application of NAMs to meet regulatory requirements. It also summarizes intra- and inter-agency collaborations that strengthen scientific, regulatory, and public confidence in NAMs, thereby fostering their global use as reliable and relevant tools for toxicological evaluations. Ultimately, understanding the current regulatory landscape helps inform the scientific community on the steps needed to further advance timely uptake of approaches that best protect human health and the environment.
Introduction:The Institute for In Vitro Sciences is sponsoring a workshop series to identify, discuss, and develop recommendations for optimal scientific and technical approaches for conducting in vitro assays-focusing first on genotoxicity assays-used for assessing potential toxicity within and across tobacco and electronic nicotine delivery product categories (hereafter referred to as tobacco products). Materials and Methods: Workshops provide a unique opportunity for invited expert stakeholders to share experiences and to develop recommendations that may serve as a resource for developing optimal testing approaches and data interpretation. It is envisioned that some recommendations would form the basis for the generation of guidance documents and/or serve as authoritative reference publications to support regulatory submissions.Results and Discussion: During the first workshop (November 27-28, 2018), workgroup members identified important issues for using in vitro genotoxicity assays for evaluating tobacco products. These issues were triaged into three priority categories that will provide the basis for selecting high-priority topics for subsequent workshops. To provide background for future workshops and to serve as a scientific community resource, the workgroup developed a tabulated referenced summary of the types of tobacco product test samples that have been evaluated using the regulatory genotoxicity assays and the types of regulatory questions that have been addressed. A touch-base meeting was held March 7, 2019, and a second workshop June 4-5, 2019 to discuss ongoing issues and to further organize workgroup activities. Conclusion:The current publication lists priority topics and background summary information for using regulatory genotoxicity assays to evaluate tobacco products.
The Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) is sponsoring a series of workshops to develop recommendations for optimal scientific and technical approaches for conducting in vitro assays to assess potential toxicity within and across tobacco and various next‐generation products (NGPs) including heated tobacco products (HTPs) and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs). This publication was developed by a working group of the workshop members in conjunction with the sixth workshop in that series entitled “Dosimetry for conducting in vitro evaluations” and focuses on aerosol dosimetry for aerosol exposure to combustible cigarettes, HTP, and ENDS aerosolized tobacco products and summarizes the key challenges as well as documenting areas for future research.
The Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) is sponsoring a series of workshops to identify, discuss and develop recommendations for optimal scientific and technical approaches for conducting in vitro assays, to assess potential toxicity within and across tobacco and various next generation nicotine and tobacco products (NGPs), including heated tobacco products (HTPs) and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The third workshop (24–26 February 2020) summarised the key challenges and made recommendations concerning appropriate methods of test article generation and cell exposure from combustible cigarettes, HTPs and ENDS. Expert speakers provided their research, perspectives and recommendations for the three basic types of tobacco-related test articles: i) pad-collected material (PCM); ii) gas vapour phase (GVP); and iii) whole smoke/aerosol. These three types of samples can be tested individually, or the PCM and GVP can be combined. Whole smoke/aerosol can be bubbled through media or applied directly to cells at the air–liquid interface. Summaries of the speaker presentations and the recommendations developed by the workgroup are presented. Following discussion, the workshop concluded the following: that there needs to be greater standardisation in aerosol generation and collection processes; that methods for testing the NGPs need to be developed and/or optimised, since simply mirroring cigarette smoke testing approaches may be insufficient; that understanding and quantitating the applied dose is fundamental to the interpretation of data and conclusions from each study; and that whole smoke/aerosol approaches must be contextualised with regard to key information, including appropriate experimental controls, environmental conditioning, analytical monitoring, verification and performance criteria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.