The poor response rate in this survey dictates the need for caution in interpretation of the results. However, they suggest that the health of students is poor relative to that of their peers, and that their emotional health is more of a problem than their physical health. Public health practitioners might want to pay more attention to the health of this important and relatively neglected group. Worries about studies and money appear to be affecting students' academic work, and this should be of concern to higher education establishments.
Aim:To describe a general practice commissioning project including 19 nonfundholding practices in Buckinghamshire: its structure, aims, representativeness, outcomes, costs and sustainability, and lessons learned from the process over the rst 18 months. Method: Examination of project documentation; postal questionnaire to all 73 participating GPs and to eight key players in the Health Authority (response rate 72%); and in-depth interviews with six Health Authority staff and 15 general practitioners (GPs). Results: A representative structure and process were established for GP involvement in commissioning. 75% of GPs were involved. Mutual understanding improved between the GPs and the Health Authority. Service improvements identi ed included developments in orthopaedics, community psychiatric nursing, physiotherapy and ophthalmology. Lessons were learned about the importance of open and continued communication; clarity about expectations, accountability, power and responsibility; development of relationships and understanding in joint working; the time required to achieve tangible results; and the need to develop GPs' commissioning skills.The project cost about £10 000 in cash and £32 500 in staff time in the rst year. Participants perceived their input as sustainable.
Conclusion:The results of the study suggest that the success of Primary Care Groups will depend on ensuring engagement of all parties in the process, clarifying roles, responsibilities and expectations, identifying shared agendas, developing explicit and achievable goals, and a commitment among all parties to implement recommendations. The work and time involved in developing mutual respect and shared understanding, and in developing commissioning skills need to be acknowledged.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.