Aneurysms of the Valsalva sinus (aortic sinus) can be congenital or acquired and are rare. They are more common among men than women and among Asians than other ethnic groups. Nonruptured aneurysms may be asymptomatic and incidentally discovered, or they may be symptomatic and manifest acutely with mass effect on adjacent cardiac structures. Ruptured Valsalva sinus aneurysms result in an aortocardiac shunt and may manifest as insidiously progressive congestive heart failure, severe acute chest pain with dyspnea, or, in extreme cases, cardiac arrest. Although both ruptured and nonruptured Valsalva sinus aneurysms may have potentially fatal complications, after treatment the prognosis is excellent. Thus, prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical. Most Valsalva sinus aneurysms are diagnosed on the basis of echocardiography, with or without angiography. However, both electrocardiographically gated computed tomography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can provide excellent anatomic depiction, and MR imaging can provide valuable functional information.

The correlation between formal coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) determined by multi-detector CT (MDCT) and the presence of coronary calcium on standard non-gated CT chest examinations was evaluated. In 163 consecutive healthy participants, we performed screening same-day standard non-gated, non-enhanced CT chest exams followed by high-resolution, ECG-synchronized MDCT exams for CACS. For the standard CT examinations, a scoring system (Weston score, range 0-12) was developed assigning a score (0-3) for each coronary vessel including the left main trunk. Overall, 30% and 39% of patients had CAC on standard CT and MDCT exams, respectively (P = 0.13). CAC on standard CT was highly correlated to the Agatston CACS on the MDCT (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.83, P < 0.001). Absence of calcium on the standard CT exam was associated with a very low CACS (mean Agatston 0.5, range 0-19). A Weston score >2 identified a CACS > 100 with an area under the curve of 0.976, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 85%. A Weston score >7 identified a CACS > 400 with an area under the curve of 0.991, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 98%. The intra-observer variability was low as was the inter-observer variability between a cardiac specialized radiologist and a non-specialized reader. A visual coronary artery scoring system on standard, non-gated CT correlates well with traditional methods for CACS. Further, a non-expert cardiac radiologist performed equally well to a cardiac expert. This information suggests that a visual scoring system, at least in a descriptive manner can be utilized for a general statement about coronary artery calcification seen on standard CT imaging to guide clinicians in risk stratification.

In patients referred for CAAF, MDCT is a sensitive (100% sensitivity) imaging modality that could be used alone especially in patients age <52 years with a CHADS(2) score <1. Incorporation of these findings could decrease the need for multiple imaging modalities and thereby reduce cost of the procedure.

CPAFs are seen in a variety of clinical settings, from infants with advanced congenital heart disease to elderly patients who have undergone revascularization surgery. Although coronary artery fistulas have previously been described as rarely involving multiple coronary arteries, with the right coronary artery being most often involved, our series demonstrates that multiple fistulas are commonly present, with the most common pattern being between the left main/left anterior descending and the main pulmonary trunk.

The presence of ECF in our daily practice is frequent, and not limited to the identification of pulmonary nodules, and reinforces the notion that all the organs in the scan should be thoroughly and methodically evaluated.

Aortic valve replacement accounts for a significant portion of cardiac surgeries in the United States. Despite advances in prosthetic heart valve design, surgical technique, and postoperative care, complications after aortic valve replacement remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Routine surveillance of prosthetic heart valves with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and fluoroscopy is important, as these techniques allow accurate detection of prosthetic valve dysfunction. However, echocardiography and fluoroscopy may not allow identification of the specific underlying cause, including paravalvular leak, dehiscence, endocarditis, obstruction, structural failure, pseudoaneurysm formation, aortic dissection, and hemolysis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) have an emerging role as diagnostic tools complementary to conventional imaging for detection and monitoring of complications after aortic valve replacement. The choice between CT and MR imaging depends on individual patient characteristics, the type of prosthetic valve, and the acuity of the clinical situation. In general, screening with TTE followed by TEE is recommended. When results of TTE and TEE are inconclusive, cardiac CT and MR imaging should be considered. The choice between these imaging techniques depends on the presence of patient-specific contraindications to CT or MR imaging.

No abstract

No abstract