Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is typically performed to restore a neutral mechanical alignment. Recently, there has been increased interest in kinematic alignment to restore the patient’s individual alignment. The purpose of this study is to determine if kinematic balancing reduces the need for intraoperative soft tissue releases and rates of manipulation under anesthesia compared to mechanical alignment. Materials and Methods: A query was performed between January 2021 and July 2022 to identify all patients who underwent a primary TKA that was performed with kinematic alignment (KA), which revealed 97 patients (107 TKAs). A cohort of consecutive patients from the preceding six months was gathered of patients who underwent primary TKA with mechanical alignment (MA). This cohort consisted of 199 patients (223 TKAs), yielding a total study cohort of 296 patients (330 knees). Mean age was 64.7 years, mean body mass index (BMI) was 33.1 kg/m2, and 57.1% of patients were female. Rates of manipulation under anesthesia and intraoperative release status were analyzed. Results: Average range of motion preoperatively improved from 108.9° to 114.4° in the KA group but decreased from 112.3° to 109.9° in the MA group at six weeks (p<0.0001). Three of 107 knees (2.8%) required an additional pie-crusting of the superficial MCL in the KA group, whereas 58 of 223 knees (26.0%) did in the MA group (p<0.0001). Three of 107 knees (2.8%) in the KA group and 24 of 223 knees (10.8%) in the MA group required MUA (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Kinematic alignment significantly reduced the need for intraoperative soft tissue releases and postoperative manipulation under anesthesia. Further studies of the influence of kinematic alignment on these outcomes across multiple surgeons should be performed and/or compared to mechanical alignment.
Introduction: For much of recent history, the metal-bearing surface in total knee arthroplasty has not changed much, with cobalt-chromium being the most widely-used material. However, due to the presence of nickel in its composition, much research has been done to develop alternative metal-bearing surfaces for patients with metal sensitivity. Titanium nitride coatings have shown improved performance and resistance to abrasive wear when compared to their counterparts, thus making this material an ideal alternative to current implant technology. Materials and Methods: Rigorous testing was undertaken to analyze the mechanical properties of titanium nitride for use as a coating in orthopedic implants, such as scratch adhesion, hardness, modulus, and wear rates with specialized machinery, including a Tribometer®, Nano Indenter® G200 (KLA Corporation, Milpitas, California), and scratch system. Results: Across all properties tested—abrasive wear resistance, wear resistance, cohesive and adhesive failure load, hardness, and modulus—IBED TiN coatings were shown to be dominant to both uncoated CoCr and uncoated Ti-6Al-4V in a significant manner. Conclusion: The use of IBED TiN coatings offers a way to improve the performance of mechanical components, such as orthopedic implants made from Ti-6Al-4V materials. IBED TiN coatings can enable the use of Ti-6Al-4V as an alternative to CoCr for articulating orthopedic implant devices, such as knee arthroplasty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.