Background Context: Abnormalities in intervertebral rotation and translation are important to diagnosis and treatment planning for common spinal disorders. Tests that do not sufficiently load the spine can result in misdiagnosed motion abnormalities. Upright flexion and extension x-rays are commonly used despite known limitations. Additional evidence is needed in support of preliminary studies suggesting that the change from standing to supine may sufficiently stress the spine to diagnose motion abnormalities. Purpose: Compare intervertebral translation between flexion and extension to translation between upright and supine positions in a representative clinical population. Study Design/Setting: Prospective analysis of images retrospectively collected from routine clinical practices. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval for analysis of previously obtained images, patients were identified via chart reviews where a neutral-lateral x-ray and an MRI or CT exam were obtained for diagnosis of a spinal disorder and where flexion-extension x-rays had been obtained to help diagnose abnormal intervertebral motion. The mid-sagittal slice from the MRI or CT exam was paired with the neutral-lateral radiograph. Intervertebral translation at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels between supine and standing and between flexion and extension were measured from the images using previously validated methods. The translations were classified as normal or abnormal with reference to a previously obtained database of intervertebral motion in radiographically normal and asymptomatic volunteers. Results: At the L5-S1 level in particular, there tended to be greater translation between the supine and standing than between upright flexion and extension. On average, translations were below that found in asymptomatic volunteers. No abnormal translations were detected from flexion-extension radiographs whereas approximately 7% of levels had abnormal translations between supine and upright positions. Conclusions: Intervertebral translations between supine and standing, measured using the mid-sagittal slice from a MRI or CT exam and a lateral x-ray with the patient standing can help to identify abnormal motion. This would be particularly valuable for patients with limited flexion and extension. This study thereby adds to the evidence in support of measuring intervertebral motion between the supine and upright positions to detect abnormal intervertebral motion.
Objectives:The purpose of this systematic review and meta- analysis is to compare clinical results and functional outcomes in patients with osteochondritis dessicans (OCD) lesions of the capitellum treated with either osteochondral autograft transplantation (OATS) or debridement with or without microfracture.Methods:Systematic review of multiple medical databases was performed after PROSPERO registration and using PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed using the multiple medical databases and the methodological quality of the individual studies was assessed by two review authors using the Cochrane Collaboration’s “Risk of Bias” tool. Case reports were excluded and only case series of more than five patients and higher level of evidence were included. All study, subject, and surgery parameters were collected. Data was analyzed using statistical software. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated when possible. Data were compared using Pearson Chi-Square and independent sample T tests when applicable.Results:Fifteen studies were included involving 368 patients (326 males and 42 females). There were a total of 197 patients in the debridement group and 171 patients in the OATS group. The mean age was 16.9 +/-4.1 for the debridement group and 14.6 +/-1.2 for the OATS group. Mean follow up was 29.0 +/-24.3 and 38.0 +/-12.8 for the debridement and OATS groups, respectively. Patients that underwent an OATS procedure had a statistically significant improvement in overall arc range of motion compared to patients that had a debridement (P≤0.001). When compared to patients with debridement, patients with OATS were 5.6 times more likely to return to at least their pre-injury level of sports participation (p≤0.002).Conclusion:Post-operative range of motion was significantly improved in patients undergoing an OATS procedure versus a debridement for OCD lesions of the capitellum. Patients with an OATS were 5.7 times more likely to return to at least the pre-injury level of sports participation compared to patients undergoing a debridement. Further studies are necessary in order to directly compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing a debridement procedures versus and OATS procedure.
Hallux valgus is a common progressive forefoot deformity. Although open techniques have shown good outcomes, no technique has been shown to be superior to other techniques. The current third generation of minimally invasive Chevron–Akin (MICA) technique features a percutaneous procedure with a stable internal fixation. The technique used in this study resulted in stable internal fixation; however, 1 screw was used in intramedullary fashion in the majority of cases. The purpose of this study is to review the early outcomes of MICA. Electronic Health Records (EHR) were queried for patients who underwent MICA to treat hallux valgus (HV) deformity, by a single surgeon. The primary clinical outcomes assessed were visual analog pain score (VAS), rate of revision surgery, and recurrence. Radiographic outcomes were assessed including pre and postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and bony foot width. The secondary outcomes included postoperative complications. A total of 91 feet underwent MICA to correct symptomatic HV deformity. The mean age of this cohort was 53.63 ± 15.42 years, mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.81 ± 6.21 kg/m2, mean follow-up of 6.33 ± 6.39 months and 87 feet belonged to female patients. Patients showed significant improvement in VAS and radiographic outcomes at final follow-up, with a mean improvement of 10.70° ± 6.42°, 2.39° ± 3.55°, and 5.30 mm ± 4.23 mm for the HVA, IMA, and bony foot width, respectively. Two patients (2.2%) required revision surgery for nonunion and removal of symptomatic hardware. One patient had a second metatarsal fracture treated nonoperatively. No feet had recurrence, hardware loosening, infection, or scar hypersensitivity. The current study reported on early outcomes for MICA. This technique appears to be effective and safe with no failure of fixation in our patients. We showed in our short-term follow-up, MICA led to significant improvement in pain and radiographic scores. Levels of Evidence: III, retrospective study
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.