[1] The emission of biogenic gases from large rivers can be an important component of regional greenhouse gas budgets. However, emission rate estimates are often poorly constrained due to uncertainties in the air-water gas exchange rate. We used the floating chamber method to estimate the gas transfer velocity (k) of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) in the Markland Pool of the Ohio River, a large tributary of the Mississippi River (U.S.A). We measured k every two weeks for a year at one site and at 15 additional sites distributed across the length of the pool during two summer surveys. We found that k was positively related to both water currents and wind speeds, with 46% of the gas transfer attributable to water currents at low wind speeds (e.g., 0.5 m s À1 ) and 11% at higher wind speeds (e.g., >2.0 m s À1 ). Gas transfer velocity was highly sensitive to wind, possibly because the direction of river flow was often directly opposed to the wind direction. Gas transfer velocity values derived for CH 4 were consistently greater than those derived for CO 2 when standardized to a Schmidt number of 600 (k 600 ), possibly because the transfer of CH 4 , a poorly soluble gas, was enhanced by surfacing microbubbles. Additional research to determine the conditions that support microbubble enhanced gas transfer is merited.
Models suggest that microbial activity in streams and rivers is a globally significant source of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N(2)O), a potent greenhouse gas, and the leading cause of stratospheric ozone destruction. However, model estimates of N(2)O emissions are poorly constrained due to a lack of direct measurements of microbial N(2)O production and consequent emissions, particularly from large rivers. We report the first N(2)O budget for a large, nitrogen enriched river, based on direct measurements of N(2)O emissions from the water surface and N(2)O production in the sediments and water column. Maximum N(2)O emissions occurred downstream from Cincinnati, Ohio, a major urban center on the river, due to direct inputs of N(2)O from wastewater treatment plant effluent and higher rates of in situ production. Microbial activity in the water column and sediments was a source of N(2)O, and water column production rates were nearly double those of the sediments. Emissions exhibited strong seasonality with the highest rates observed during the summer and lowest during the winter. Our results indicate N(2)O dynamics in large temperate rivers may be characterized by strong seasonal cycles and production in the pelagic zone.
The effectiveness of granular activated carbon (GAC) for carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (cVOCs) has not been evaluated in the low‐ to submicrogram per liter range. Rapid small‐scale column tests were used to determine the GAC performance at empty bed contact times (EBCTs) of 7.5 and 15 min for 13 cVOCs at a target influent concentration of 5 μg/L in a typical groundwater matrix. Breakthrough was assessed for vinyl chloride, dichloromethane, 1,1‐dichloroethane (1,1 DCA), 1,2‐dichloroethane (1,2 DCA), 1,2‐dichloropropane, carbon tetrachloride, 1,3‐butadiene, 1,1,1,2‐tetrachloroethane, 1,2,3‐trichloropropane, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene. The throughput to breakthrough was found to be linearly correlated to capacities calculated with single‐solute equilibrium isotherm parameters. Modest decreases, 9–13% on average, in throughput to 50 and 75% breakthrough were found when the EBCT was increased from 7.5 to 15 min. The carbon use rate (CUR), when scaled to simulate full‐scale adsorption, indicated that GAC would be a viable technology for seven of the cVOCs evaluated, with a CUR threshold of less than 0.2 lb/1,000 gal. It may be possible to use 1,1 DCA and 1,2 DCA as surrogates for assessing chemicals near the feasibility limit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.