Objective A retrospective audit of minor traumatic brain injury presentations to three Brisbane emergency departments aiming to assess rates of CT scans and compliance with the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCTHR), as well as reviewing the demographics of patients and their management. Method Minor traumatic brain injury presentations to the Emergency departments of the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Redcliffe Hospital and Queen Elizabeth II Hospital between July 1st and August 30th, 2019 were identified via diagnosis searches in patient tracking systems. Data collected included patient demographics, use of CT scans and Abbreviated Westmead Post Traumatic Amnesia Scale assessment, length of stay and discharge advice regarding return to sport. Results 200 minor traumatic brain injury presentations were included. 75% of patients received a CT head with only 9% of these found to be non-compliant with the CCTHR. The most common indications for CTs were age >65, GCS <15 at 2 hours post injury and anticoagulation. Only 40% of patients that qualified for A-WTPAS received the assessment. 18% of presentations were due to sporting injuries and 69% were not given return to play advice. The average length of stay was 250 minutes with 41.5% of presentations longer than 4 hours. 99% of the patients were discharged home from the ED with 1% admitted. Conclusion The study characterised minor traumatic brain injury management across three emergency departments and showed that most patients received CT head scans that were indicated. However, other areas of management such as A-WPTAs and return to play advice must be improved.

Introduction: Decompressive Craniectomies (DC) are a controversial treatment for increased intracranial pressure resulting from traumatic head injuries. The technique has been around for approximately 5000 years, but only now are researchers beginning to unlock its true potential. This article aims to summarize history, review current knowledge and identify the implications of pre-hospital emergency care.  Methods: An electronic search was conducted using the databases; Medline (via EBSCOHost), BioMed Central and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.Results: 131 articles were identified. Articles that were excluded from analysis; those unavailable as full text, not available in English and review articles. 19 articles were included in analysis. Conclusion: Decompressive Craniectomies is a comparable treatment to alternative techniques. Until recently mortality rates have been misinterpreted and unfairly reported due to the severity of brain injuries patients had already suffered. Timing of DC is a crucial factor of patient outcome, and it is of popular belief that the best chance of optimal recovery relies on a reduced injury to treatment time.

No abstract