The Individuals with Disability Education Act (IDEA) requires state educational systems to provide school-based, health related services (RS). This survey determined the financing arrangements used by states for health-related services for school-aged children with disabilities. A survey was sent to directors of special education, Medicaid, and public health departments in each of the 50 states. Financial patterns for RS were sought at the state level for children ages 3-21 with disabilities for the 1993-1994 school year, the most recent year for which complete financial data were available. Univariate analyses probed the relationship between systems' variables and the extent of Medicaid usage by local education agencies. Respondents reported that schools tapped traditional health resources to supplement educational dollars in paying for related services in schools. Medicaid was by far the most common source with 29 states reporting established mechanisms for recouping Medicaid dollars and 10 states reporting phase-in activities. Seventeen states reported that departments of public health played some role in administration, training, and demonstrations, but only six states provided specific dollars for related services through the department. Use of private insurance was reported sporadically with only one state indicating a specific state-level program. Correlates of increased Medicaid usage were presence of interagency agreements (IAAs) (OR 11.1, p = 0.002), having specific personnel for school-based medical assistance (OR 17.7, p = 0.001), and utilizing school nursing services as a Medicaid optional service (OR 4.2, p = 0.048).

Intro: Hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are considered to be at high risk for poor outcomes following COVID-19 infection given their co-morbidities and immunosuppression. Sharma et al published the CIBMTR observational report data that showed that recipients of allogeneic HSCT who contract COVID-19 have poor overall survival with a 30-day mortality of 32%. That being said, there have been relatively few studies that look into the effect of COVID-19 on HSCT recipients in the setting of in vivo T cell depletion protocols. With the increased use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based GVHD prophylaxis regimens for our match related and match unrelated HSCT recipients since 2018 at our institution, we are interested to see if our COVID-19 outcomes differ from those published in the CIBMTR report. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective analysis evaluating outcomes of HSCT recipients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 2020 and April 2021. Patients 18 years or older who underwent HSCT and subsequently contracted COVID-19 were included in the data collection. Demographic data including age, type of hematologic malignancy, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, date of COVID-19 infection, with pre- and post-COVID-19 infection labs were obtained. Our primary endpoint in this retrospective analysis was non-relapse mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Results: There were 21 patients at our institution who had undergone HSCT and subsequently contracted COVID-19. The most common primary disease types were acute lymphoblastic leukemia (33.3%), acute myeloid leukemia (23.8%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (19.0%). The median age of our patient population was 53 years (range, 24-66). 6 of the patients received match related allografts. 7 received cells from match unrelated donors. 7 received cells from haploidentical donors. 1 patient had received an autologous stem cell transplant. Of the remaining 20 allo-HSCT recipients, 14 of them (70.0%) received myeloablative conditioning regimens, whereas 6 (30.0%) received reduced intensity or non-myeloablative regimens. Our GVHD prophylaxis regimens were PTCy/Tacro/MMF (12 pts, 60.0%) and Tacro/MTX (8 pts, 40.0%). Patient demographics and outcomes are found on Tables 1 and 2. Our patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 a median 469 days post-transplant, with 8 patients (38.1%) diagnosed with COVID-19 within 1 year of transplant. 11 of the patients (52.4%) received steroids following their diagnosis with COVID-19. Of the 20 allo-HSCT recipients with confirmed COVID-19 infection, 1 passed away 20 days after the diagnosis was made. This gives us a 5.0% case fatality rate attributable to COVID-19 in our population in our allo-HSCT population. 16 of the 20 patients were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis (80.0%). 7 of the 20 patients (35.0%) were hospitalized for a median of 7 days (range, 5-17 days), with 2 requiring ICU level of care. The one patient who passed away tested positive for COVID-19 177 days post-transplant and was hospitalized approximately 7 days after diagnosis, where he was intubated on hospital day 4 and ultimately passed away on hospital day 13. The patient had received Tacro/MTX for GVHD prophylaxis. Discussion: Although this is a small sample size, our data suggests that our allo-HSCT recipients who contracted COVID-19 have had generally good short-term outcomes. Our study is limited by the small number of patients who got infected with COVID-19, particularly those within 1-year post-transplant. Furthermore, we acknowledge it is difficult to claim that the PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis regimens for our HSCT recipients were solely responsible for their improved outcomes since 40% of allo-HSCT recipients did not get PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis. However, we believe it would be valuable to evaluate in a prospective analysis. We are currently evaluating if a COVID-19 diagnosis has any effect on long term transplant related complications and outcomes in this population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chaudhary: Angeles Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder, Patents & Royalties: Cell therapy ; Celldex: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Moderna: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pancella: Consultancy; Oncotartis: Consultancy; Athelas: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; TCR2: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yaghmour: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of having male infertility on urology residents' infertility training experience, surgical confidence, and In-Service-Exam Infertility/Sexual Medicine subscores. We electronically surveyed urology residents throughout the United States querying exposure to infertility faculty and fertility knowledge.Univariable and multivariable analysis was performed to determine predictors of higher In-Service Exam Infertility/Sexual Medicine sub-scores and self-rated infertility competency.Fifty-four of 72 respondents (75%) reported that male infertility comprises ≤10% of their training. Of the 63 residents who have a reproductive urologist on faculty, 66.7%, 47.6%, and 49.2% have scrubbed/observed a microsurgical varicocelectomy, vasectomy reversal and testicular sperm extraction, respectively. Residents exposed to infertility faculty are more likely to self-rate their infertility understanding as "excellent" or "good" (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively), and 14.4Â more likely to feel confident performing infertility procedures, versus residents lacking faculty (p < 0.001). Residents having formal microsurgical training have better self-rated infertility understanding (p < 0.001), non-obstructive azoospermia management (p = 0.01), and competency performing infertility procedures (p < 0.001). Residents exposed to fertility faculty are more likely to feel confident performing fertility procedures after residency (p = 0.001). In conclusion, infertility comprises a minority of residency training. Most residents anticipate performing infertility procedures in practice, despite two-thirds lacking confidence performing these. Having an infertility faculty and formal microsurgical training improves residents' surgical confidence, nonobstructive azoospermia management, and global male infertility understanding. A structured educational curriculum may improve resident infertility training.

No abstract

Intro: Acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), alongside mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus (TAC), is known to be effective in reducing cGVHD in haploidentical (HI) transplant recipients. Results of the prospective randomized HOVON-96 trial in recipients of matched related (MRD) and unrelated donors (MUD) showed that PTCy leads to a reduction in risk of severe cGVHD. However, the role of PTCy in HSCT with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes using PTCy, TAC, and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis in MRD and MUD stem cell recipients who have ALL. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of adult patients (aged 19 and up) with ALL who received MRD, MUD, and HI HSCT at USC Norris Cancer Hospital from 2018 to 2020. The primary end-points were to compare incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD within the first year post-transplant after receiving MRD, MUD, and HI donor transplants. Secondary end-points were day +100 mortality, 1-year overall survival (OS), relapse free survival (RFS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), and GRFS within the same subgroups. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank tests were used to evaluate a difference in outcomes. Results: A total of 46 patients with ALL who received HSCTs were identified and separated based on type of GVHD prophylaxis received: 7 (15.1%), 16 (34.8%), and 23 (50.0%) in the PT-Cy, HI and standard groups respectively. Demographic data can be found on Table 1 attached. Baseline characteristics among all groups were similar with the exception of the more Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) mismatch (p&lt;0.01), higher number of patients receiving stem cells from bone marrow (p=0.02) and the increased proportion of patients receiving less than 5.0 x 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg (p=0.02) in the PTCy group. With regards to the primary end-points as seen on Table 2, there was a non-significant trend toward less frequent severe aGVHD and severe cGVHD in the PTCy group compared to the standard and HI cohorts (p=0.13). The rates of severe aGVHD were 0%, 6.2%, and 8.7% in the PT-Cy, HI and standard groups respectively. The rates of severe cGVHD were 0%, 6.2%, and 21.8% in the PT-Cy, HI and standard groups respectively. With regards to the secondary end-points in our study, as seen on Tables 2 and 3, patients receiving standard GVHD prophylaxis had a 95.7% 1-year OS, a 91.1% 1-year RFS, and 87.0% 1-year GRFS. Moreover, MRD/MUD recipients receiving PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis had worse outcomes with an 40.0% 1-year OS, a 62.5% 1-year RFS, and 62.5% 1-year GRFS. Comparatively, patients receiving HI transplants exhibited a 100% 1-year OS, a 100% 1-year RFS, and 91.7% 1-year GRFS. This was statistically significant across all outcome measures: OS (p=&lt;0.01), RFS (p=0.0038), and GRFS (p=0.048). Kaplan-Meier curves for OS, GRFS, and RFS are attached. Discussion: In this single institution analysis, we observed that patients with ALL who underwent HI transplant had the best outcomes. Moreover, patients receiving MUD/MRD HSCT with use of PTCy had a non-significant reduced incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD, though had significantly worse 1-year OS, RFS, and GRFS when compared to standard GVHD prophylaxis or patients receiving HI transplants. We believe this is likely a multifactorial process. However, the increased percentage of mismatched antigens in the MUD transplants (p=0.19) and higher proportion of patients receiving less than 5.0 x 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg (p=0.02) in the PTCy group is important to acknowledge and can also be contributing to their poorer outcomes. We pose the idea that the use of PTCy may also lead to a reduced graft vs. leukemia effect in this population and thus a higher incidence of relapse and worse outcomes overall. A larger, prospective study should be considered to take into account these factors to better determine if patients with ALL could benefit from PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chaudhary: Celldex: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Moderna: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pancella: Consultancy; Oncotartis: Consultancy; Athelas: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; TCR2: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Angeles Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder, Patents & Royalties: Cell therapy . Yaghmour: Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau.