Many different product development approaches are taught and used in engineering and management disciplines. These formalized design methods, processes, and environments differ in the types of projects for which they are relevant, the project components they include, and the support they provide users. This paper details a review of sixteen well-established product development approaches, the development of a decision support system to help designers and managers navigate these approaches, and the administration of a survey to gather subjective assessments and feedback from design experts. The included approaches-design thinking, systems thinking, total quality management, agile development, waterfall process, engineering design, spiral model, vee model, axiomatic design, value-driven design, decision-based design, lean manufacturing, six sigma, theory of constraints, scrum, and extreme programming-are categorized based on six criteria: complexity, guidance, phase, hardware or software applicability, values, and users. A decision support system referred to as the Product Development Approach Advisor (PD Advisor) is developed to aid designers in navigating these approaches and selecting an appropriate approach based on specific project needs. Next, a survey is conducted with design experts to gather feedback on the support system and the categorization of approaches and criteria. The survey results are compared to the original classification of approaches by the authors to validate and provide feedback on the PD Advisor. The findings highlight the value and limitations of the PD Advisor for product development practice and education, as well as the opportunities for future work.
A number of systems and design approaches are being taught and used in different engineering and management disciplines, and most student and practitioners involved in product development simply apply the methods and tools that they are most familiar with. As each design approach was developed for a particular context, scope, and type of problem, there is a need for additional support in selecting the most appropriate engineering design methodology. This study began with a thorough review of some of the most common approaches taught for product development: engineering design, design thinking, decision based design (DBD), systems thinking, axiomatic design, vee model, value driven design (VDD), waterfall model, spiral model, agile, total quality management (TQM), theory of constraints (ToC), six sigma, and lean manufacturing. Through this review, a number of criteria were identified to categorize and distinguish the approaches, and each approach was then assessed according to the criteria to aid in comparison and evaluation of fit for any given project. Next, a decision support tool is proposed to help designers or project managers select the best methodology for their specific problems. This decision-making aid takes in information about the nature of the potential project and uses pre-defined metrics to recommend the most appropriate methodology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.