Background: To investigate deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we performed a single institutional study to evaluate its prevalence, risk factors, prognosis, and potential thromboprophylaxis strategies in a large referral and treatment center. Methods: We studied a total of 143 patients with COVID-19 from January 29, 2020 to February 29, 2020. Demographic and clinical data, laboratory data, including ultrasound scans of the lower extremities, and outcome variables were obtained, and comparisons were made between groups with and without DVT. Results: Of the 143 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (age 63±14 years, 74 [51.7%] men), 66 patients developed lower extremity DVT (46.1%: 23 [34.8%] with proximal DVT and 43 [65.2%] with distal DVT). Compared with patients who did not have DVT, patients with DVT were older and had a lower oxygenation index, a higher rate of cardiac injury, and worse prognosis, including an increased proportion of deaths (23 [34.8%] versus 9 [11.7%]; P =0.001) and a decreased proportion of patients discharged (32 [48.5%] versus 60 [77.9%]; P <0.001). Multivariant analysis showed an association only between CURB-65 (confusion status, urea, respiratory rate, and blood pressure) score 3 to 5 (odds ratio, 6.122; P =0.031), Padua prediction score ≥4 (odds ratio, 4.016; P =0.04), D-dimer >1.0 μg/mL (odds ratio, 5.818; P <0.014), and DVT in this cohort, respectively. The combination of a CURB-65 score 3 to 5, a Padua prediction score ≥4, and D-dimer >1.0 μg/mL has a sensitivity of 88.52% and a specificity of 61.43% for screening for DVT. In the subgroup of patients with a Padua prediction score ≥4 and whose ultrasound scans were performed >72 hours after admission, DVT was present in 18 (34.0%) patients in the subgroup receiving venous thromboembolism prophylaxis versus 35 (66.0%) patients in the nonprophylaxis group ( P =0.010). Conclusions: The prevalence of DVT is high and is associated with adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism may be protective in patients with a Padua protection score ≥4 after admission. Our data seem to suggest that COVID-19 is probably an additional risk factor for DVT in hospitalized patients.
Introduction Gram-negative resistance is a well-acknowledged public health threat. Surveillance data can be used to monitor resistance trends and identify strategies to mitigate their threat. The objective of this study was to assess antibiotic resistance trends in Gram-negative bacteria. Methods The first cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Citrobacter , Escherichia coli , Enterobacter , Klebsiella , Morganella morganii , Proteus mirabilis , and Serratia marcescens per hospitalized patient per month collected from 125 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) between 2011 to 2020 were included. Time trends of resistance phenotypes (carbapenem, fluoroquinolone, extended-spectrum cephalosporin, multi-drug, and difficult-to-treat) were analyzed with Joinpoint regression to estimate average annual percent changes (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals and p values. A 2020 antibiogram of reported antibiotic percent susceptibilities was also created to evaluate resistance rates at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Among 40 antimicrobial resistance phenotype trends assessed in 494,593 Gram-negative isolates, there were no noted increases; significant decreases were observed in 87.5% ( n = 35), including in all P. aeruginosa , Citrobacter , Klebsiella , M. morganii , and S. marcescens phenotypes ( p < 0.05). The largest decreases were seen in carbapenem-resistant phenotypes of P. mirabilis , Klebsiella , and M. morganii (AAPCs: − 22.9%, − 20.7%, and − 20.6%, respectively). In 2020, percent susceptibility was over 80% for all organisms tested against aminoglycosides, cefepime, ertapenem, meropenem, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam. Conclusion We observed significant decreases in antibiotic resistance for P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales over the past decade. According to the 2020 antibiogram, in vitro antimicrobial activity was observed for most treatment options. These results may be related to the robust infection control and antimicrobial stewardship programs instituted nationally among VAMCs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.