We present an experimental study of a novel method to verify the range of proton therapy beams. Differential cross sections were measured for 15 prompt gamma-ray lines from proton-nuclear interactions with (12)C and (16)O at proton energies up to 150 MeV. These cross sections were used to model discrete prompt gamma-ray emissions along proton pencil-beams. By fitting detected prompt gamma-ray counts to these models, we simultaneously determined the beam range and the oxygen and carbon concentration of the irradiated matter. The performance of the method was assessed in two phantoms with different elemental concentrations, using a small scale prototype detector. Based on five pencil-beams with different ranges delivering 5 × 10(8) protons and without prior knowledge of the elemental composition at the measurement point, the absolute range was determined with a standard deviation of 1.0-1.4 mm. Relative range shifts at the same dose level were detected with a standard deviation of 0.3-0.5 mm. The determined oxygen and carbon concentrations also agreed well with the actual values. These results show that quantitative prompt gamma-ray measurements enable knowledge of nuclear reaction cross sections to be used for precise proton range verification in the presence of tissue with an unknown composition.

Methods to overcome metal artifacts in computed tomography (CT) images have been researched and developed for nearly 40 years. When X-rays pass through a metal object, depending on its size and density, different physical effects will negatively affect the measurements, most notably beam hardening, scatter, noise, and the non-linear partial volume effect. These phenomena severely degrade image quality and hinder the diagnostic power and treatment outcomes in many clinical applications. In this paper, we first review the fundamental causes of metal artifacts, categorize metal object types, and present recent trends in the CT metal artifact reduction (MAR) literature. To improve image quality and recover information about underlying structures, many methods and correction algorithms have been proposed and tested. We comprehensively review and categorize these methods into six different classes of MAR: metal implant optimization, improvements to the data acquisition process, data correction based on physics models, modifications to the reconstruction algorithm (projection completion and iterative reconstruction), and image-based post-processing. The primary goals of this paper are to identify the strengths and limitations of individual MAR methods and overall classes, and establish a relationship between types of metal objects and the classes that most effectively overcome their artifacts. The main challenges for the field of MAR continue to be cases with large, dense metal implants, as well as cases with multiple metal objects in the field of view. Severe photon starvation is difficult to compensate for with only software corrections. Hence, the future of MAR seems to be headed toward a combined approach of improving the acquisition process with dual-energy CT, higher energy X-rays, or photon-counting detectors, along with advanced reconstruction approaches. Additional outlooks are addressed, including the need for a standardized evaluation system to compare MAR methods.

A significant and increasing number of patients receiving radiation therapy present with metal objects close to, or even within, the treatment area, resulting in artifacts in computed tomography (CT) imaging, which is the most commonly used imaging method for treatment planning in radiation therapy. In the presence of metal implants, such as dental fillings in treatment of head-and-neck tumors, spinal stabilization implants in spinal or paraspinal treatment or hip replacements in prostate cancer treatments, the extreme photon absorption by the metal object leads to prominent image artifacts. Although current CT scanners include a series of correction steps for beam hardening, scattered radiation and noisy measurements, when metal implants exist within or close to the treatment area, these corrections do not suffice. CT metal artifacts affect negatively the treatment planning of radiation therapy either by causing difficulties to delineate the target volume or by reducing the dose calculation accuracy. Various metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods have been explored in terms of improvement of organ delineation and dose calculation in radiation therapy treatment planning, depending on the type of radiation treatment and location of the metal implant and treatment site. Including a brief description of the available CT MAR methods that have been applied in radiation therapy, this article attempts to provide a comprehensive review on the dosimetric effect of the presence of CT metal artifacts in treatment planning, as reported in the literature, and the potential improvement suggested by different MAR approaches. The impact of artifacts on the treatment planning and delivery accuracy is discussed in the context of different modalities, such as photon external beam, brachytherapy and particle therapy, as well as by type and location of metal implants.