The Evans tenodesis is an operative treatment for chronic ankle instability with good short-term results. The disadvantage of impaired hind foot kinematics and restricted motion has been described, and only few reports of long-term results can be found. No techniques have been used to assess the outcome objectively. We wanted to determine whether a modified Evans procedure led to a satisfactory clinical and functional outcome. Nineteen patients were available at a 10-year follow-up. The clinical examination included a detailed questionnaire and stress radiographs. Foot function was evaluated with plantar pressure distribution measurements during walking and peroneal reaction time measurements elicited on a rapidly tilting platform (recorded with surface electromyography). High subjective patient satisfaction was contrasted with a high rate of residual instability, pain, and swelling. The radiographs showed an increased number of exostoses. The gait analysis revealed reduced peak pressures under the lateral heel and increased values under the longitudinal arch. The reaction times of the peroneal muscles were shorter on the operated side (significant: peroneus longus). The persistent clinical problems as well as the functional changes indicate that the disturbed ankle joint kinematics permanently alter foot function and may subsequently support the development of arthrosis. Therefore, the Evans procedure should only be applied if anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments is not feasible.

No abstract

The high-vacuum drainage that is most commonly used in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland results in increased blood loss with no reduction in the extent of residual wound haematoma and offers no additional advantage over passive drainage systems in thyroid surgery.

No abstract

No abstract

The anatomic proof of a spinal compartment and the clinical symptoms of compartment syndrome in patients with chronic back pain are inconsistent with the rarely met measuring criteria of intramuscular pressure (IMP). Previous studies assume a dependence of the IMP on spinal alignment (degree of lumbar spine flexion) and the degree of muscle activation. The significance of these disturbance variables in the interpretation of IMP could explain the above discrepancy. This study therefore investigates the influence of both a 30% increase in trunk flexion and alterations in muscle contraction from 100% to 60%. Sixteen healthy subjects participated in the study. The IMP and mean rectified amplitude of the multifidus surface EMG signal were determined at rest and 0 degrees and approximately 30 degrees of lumbar spine flexion, and they were compared. Subsequently, both parameters were measured during both 100% and 60% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the muscle and then correlated. During rest and 0 degrees flexion, the median IMP was 9.3 mmHg (range 0.0-22.5) while the median mean rectified amplitude (MRA) of the EMG signal was 1.98 microV (range 1.32-7.38). In 30 degrees flexion, the median IMP went up to 24.3 mmHg (range 1.4-97.3) with hardly any increase in the median MRA of 2.32 microV (range 1.20-9.72). Under 60% MVC, the median IMP rose to 186.6 mmHg (range 15.4-375.4) and the median MRA to 21.02 microV (range 4.63-43.63). During 100% MVC, the median MRA increased to 34.38 microV (range 12.99-102.54) while the median IMP rose to 273.4 mmHg (range 90.4-395.1). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the IMP and MRA quotients of the 100/60% MVC values was r= -0.21. To sum up, it can be said that IMP was subject to great interindividual variation in all the experiments. This parameter is highly dependent on spinal alignment and muscular activity. Further studies are needed so that the IMP can be interpreted properly when diagnosing a chronic compartment of the erector spinae muscles.

The early diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome is very important, compartment monitoring is advocated. There is however still some controversy regarding the use of compartment pressure measurement devices in the diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome. We present the results of a survey that was designed to explore this issue in Germany. In the case of suspected acute compartment syndrome 50.9% (n = 214) of the surgeons perform intracompartmental pressure measurement. Pressure measurement is of lower significance for 61.8% (n = 215) surgeons questioned. Additional apparative diagnostics is performed by 41.7% of the surgeons. A large majority apply the Stryker device (63.1%, n = 135), followed by the Coach device (12.1%, n = 26). The pressure threshold for intervention is recommended by 51.4% (n = 110) of the traumatologists as an absolute compartment pressure value. The remaining 48.6% (n = 104) include haemodynamic parameters in their decision. The surgeons employ widely differing methods of approach in the diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome. Some of these are extremely different from the methods recommended in the literature.

From all studies no uniform recommendation for parameters of diagnostic relevance can be derived. On this background it should be demanded that future research is conducted by a uniform regimen for examination and modern technique of measuring with a high temporal resolution. Under these standardised conditions the investigated parameters of the intracompartmental pressure curve should be reconsidered once more regarding diagnostic predictability by calculations of specifity and sensitivity.