Introduction For those children having surgery, induction of anaesthesia is one of the most stressful procedures the child experiences perioperatively. Current work has failed to show a benefit of parental presence at induction of anaesthesia for all children. The reasons for lack of effect may include the high anxiety levels of some parents and also that the role for parents at their child's induction is not delineated. The main aim of this study was to see if parental preparation by teaching of distraction techniques could reduce their child's anxiety during intravenous induction of anaesthesia. Methods After ethics committee approval 40 children aged 2–10 years old, ASA status I or II undergoing daycase surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled into the study. To avoid possible confounding factors children with a history of previous, surgery, chronic illness or developmental delay were excluded form participation. No children were given sedative premedication. After written informed consent by the parent, each child and parent was randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Parents in the intervention group received preparation from a play specialist working on the children's surgical ward. It involved preparation for events in the anaesthetic room and instruction on methods of distraction for their child during induction using novel toys, books or blowing bubbles appropriate to the child's age. Preoperative information collected included demographic and baseline data. The temperament of the child was measured using the EASI (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity) instrument of child temperament(l). In the anaesthetic room all children were planned to have intravenous induction of anaesthesia after prior application of EMLA cream. Anxiety of the child was measured by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS)(2) by a blinded independent observer at three time points: entrance to the anaesthetic room, intravenous cannulation and at anaesthesia induction. Cooperation of the child was measured by the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) by the same observer (3). Postoperative data collected included parental satisfaction and anxiety scores measured by the Stait Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)(4) and at one week the behaviour of the child was measured Using the Posthospitalisation Behavioural Questionnaire (PHBQ)(5). Normally distributed data were analysed by a two‐sample t‐test, categorical data by Pearson's Chi‐squared test and non‐parametric data by the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test. Results One parent withdrew after enrolment. This left 22 children in the control group and 17 in the intervention group. There were no significant differences in demographic and baseline data of the children between the two groups including ethnic origin, number of siblings, birth order of the child, recent stressful events in the child's life, previous hospital admissions and the temperament of the child. Parent demographics were also similar between groups including parent's age, sex, relationshi...
Table of contentsWORKSHOP 4: Challenging clinical scenarios (CS01–CS06)CS01 Bullous lesions in two children: solitary mastocytomaS. Tolga Yavuz, Ozan Koc, Ali Gungor, Faysal GokCS02 Multi-System Allergy (MSA) of cystic fibrosis: our institutional experienceJessica Hawley, Christopher O’Brien, Matthew Thomas, Malcolm Brodlie, Louise MichaelisCS03 Cold urticaria in pediatric age: an invisible cause for severe reactionsInês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Susana Piedade, Graça Sampaio, José Geraldo Dias, Miguel Paiva, Mário Morais-AlmeidaCS04 Angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency in a girl: a challenge diagnosisCristina Madureira, Tânia Lopes, Susana Lopes, Filipa Almeida, Alexandra Sequeira, Fernanda Carvalho, José OliveiraCS05 A child with unusual multiple organ allergy disease: what is the primer?Fabienne Gay-CrosierCS06 A case of uncontrolled asthma in a 6-year-old patientIoana-Valentina Nenciu, Andreia Florina Nita, Alexandru Ulmeanu, Dumitru Oraseanu, Carmen ZapucioiuORAL ABSTRACT SESSION 1: Food allergy (OP01–OP06)OP01 Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: oral food challenge outcomes for tolerance evaluation in a Pediatric HospitalAdrianna Machinena, Olga Domínguez Sánchez, Montserrat Alvaro Lozano, Rosa Jimenez Feijoo, Jaime Lozano Blasco, Mònica Piquer Gibert, Mª Teresa Giner Muñoz, Marcia Dias da Costa, Ana Maria Plaza MartínOP02 Characteristics of infants with food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome and allergic proctocolitisEbru Arik Yilmaz, Özlem Cavkaytar, Betul Buyuktiryaki, Ozge Soyer, Cansin SackesenOP03 The clinical and immunological outcomes after consumption of baked egg by 1–5 year old egg allergic children: results of a randomised controlled trialMerrynNetting, Adaweyah El-Merhibi, Michael Gold, PatrickQuinn, IrmeliPenttila, Maria MakridesOP04 Oral immunotherapy for treatment of egg allergy using low allergenic, hydrolysed eggStavroula Giavi, Antonella Muraro, Roger Lauener, Annick Mercenier, Eugen Bersuch, Isabella M. Montagner, Maria Passioti, Nicolò Celegato, Selina Summermatter, Sophie Nutten, Tristan Bourdeau, Yvonne M. Vissers, Nikolaos G. PapadopoulosOP05 Chemical modification of a peanut extract results in an increased safety profile while maintaining efficacyHanneke van der Kleij, Hans Warmenhoven, Ronald van Ree, Raymond Pieters, Dirk Jan Opstelten, Hans van Schijndel, Joost SmitOP06 Administration of the yellow fever vaccine in egg allergic childrenRoisin Fitzsimons, Victoria Timms, George Du ToitORAL ABSTRACT SESSION 2: Asthma (OP07–OP12)OP07 Previous exacerbation is the most important risk factor for future exacerbations in school-age children with asthmaS. Tolga Yavuz, Guven Kaya, Mustafa Gulec, Mehmet Saldir, Osman Sener, Faysal GokOP08 Comparative study of degree of severity and laboratory changes between asthmatic children using different acupuncture modalitiesNagwa Hassan, Hala Shaaban, Hazem El-Hariri, Ahmed Kamel Inas E. MahfouzOP09 The concentration of exhaled carbon monoxide in asthmatic children with different controlled stadiumPapp Gabor, Biro Gabor, Kovacs CsabaOP10 ...
Introduction In infants and young children epidural catheterisation is technically more difficult than in older children and adults (1). Various solutions have been offered to make this difficult task easier (2–4). One of the suggested remedies is using the paramedian approach to the epidural space (5,6). The paramedian approach not only makes the procedure technically less difficult, but because of the angle of needle entry, the chance of dural puncture is low (7,8). The aims of this questionnaire were to investigate whether paediatric anaesthetists experienced any catheter related difficulties with epidural anaesthesia, what manoeuvres were used to overcome these difficulties and if a paramedian approach was used to place paediatric epidurals. Methods A postal questionnaire was sent to members of the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists resident in the UK. There were five questions asked with an option of 2–4 replies. The questions pertained to frequency of use of epidural catheters in infants and young children, preferred approach, difficulties encountered, methods to overcome problems and use of paramedian approach. Results 203 questionnaires were sent between November 2000 and December 2000 and 145 replies were received making an overall response rate of 71.45%. From our survey we note that 66 out of 145(45.5%) paediatric anaesthetists regularly use epidural catheters in infants and children less than 15 kg, while 42(28.9%) are occasional users and 9(6.2%) use them infrequently. Thirty out of 145(20.66%) never use this technique in this age group at all. Therefore 115 respondents use the technique. As regards the preferred approach; 107 out of 115(77%) paediatric anaesthetists use the midline approach while only 5 members(4.34%) prefer the paramedian approach and a small percentage(2.6%) use other approaches i.e. caudal catheters. Some members (8/145) in the survey suggested that the reason for infrequent use of the paramedian approach was lack of training. 49/115(42.6%) paediatric anaesthetists occasionally encountered problems with catheter insertion and 69/115(60%) rarely had any problems. Therefore it was felt that, since there were no problems with the midline approach, a change was not warranted. In case of a problem with epidurals only 8 members(6.95%) would consider using the paramedian approach. Nearly 50% (57/115) of epidural users felt that they did not know/could not comment on the paramedian approach, as they never used the technique. Suggested methods to overcome problems with threading the catheter include: using 18 g Tuohy needle with 21 g catheter rather than 23 g catheters; inserting the needle in midline in a slightly cephalad direction in order to ‘open the angle’ for subsequent catheter insertion; using the blue introducer for feeding the catheter; injecting saline/local anaesthetic to ‘dilate’ the epidural space before inserting the catheter, etc. Summary In summary, this survey of epidural practices in young children shows that technical problems with epidural catheter insertio...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.