Certain male moths flying upwind toward a scent-producing female appear to be guided anemotactically by optomotor reactions to the ground pattern. Loss of the odor stimulus changes the anemotactic angle from into wind to across wind with left-right reversals.

Counterturning' (meaning here the execution of a succession of alternating left and right turns) is the common feature in upwind zigzagging and cross-wind casting by flying insects manoeuvring towards a small source of windborne odour. Recent progress in understanding its control and function is discussed. Counterturning is internally controlled ('self-steered') in the limited sense that, once initiated by a chemical stimulus, it continues without further changes in the chemical input both in clean air and in a homogeneous cloud of odour. As a reaction it appears to be the kind of chemotaxis distinguished as longitudinal klinotaxis, for which the stimulus is a difference of chemical concentration detected over time along the insect's path, not across it. The new directions taken in response to the stimulus, being self-steered in the above sense, have no necessary relation to the direction of the chemical gradient that provided the stimulus but are influenced by the visual cues generated by wind drift. In wind, the countertuming programme is modulated by changes in the chemical input and simultaneously integrated with anemotaxis, but it can then continue in similar form after the wind has ceased. Unambiguous evidence for these conclusions is so far available only for certain flying male moths responding to sex pheromone. The primary function of countertuming, of all amplitudes and in both zigzagging and casting, appears to be the regaining of contact with an elusive scent.

Context.-Depression and ischemic heart disease often are comorbid conditions and, in patients who have had a myocardial infarction, the presence of depression is associated with increased mortality. Patients with heart disease need a safe and effective treatment for depression. Objective.-To compare the efficacy, cardiovascular effects, and safety of a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, with a tricyclic antidepressant, nortriptyline hydrochloride, in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. Design.-Two-week placebo lead-in followed by a double-blind randomized 6week medication trial. Setting.-Research clinics in 4 university centers. Patients.-Eighty-one outpatients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder and with documented ischemic heart disease. Interventions.-Treatment with either paroxetine, 20 to 30 mg/d, or nortriptyline targeted to a therapeutic plasma level, 190 to 570 nmol/L (50-150 ng/mL), for 6 weeks. Main Outcome Measures.-For effectiveness of treatment, a decline in the score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by 50% and final score of 8 or less; for cardiovascular safety, heart rate and rhythm, supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures, electrocardiogram conduction intervals, indexes of heart rate variability, and rate of adverse events. Results.-By intent-to-treat analysis, 25 (61%) of 41 patients improved during treatment with paroxetine and 22 (55%) of 40 improved with nortriptyline. Neither drug significantly affected blood pressure or conduction intervals. Paroxetine had no sustained effects on heart rate or rhythm or indexes of heart rate variability, whereas patients treated with nortriptyline had a sustained 11% increase in heart rate from a mean of 75 to 83 beats per minute (PϽ.001) and a reduction in heart rate variability, as measured by the SD of all normal R-R intervals over a 24-hour period, from 112 to 96 (PϽ.01). Adverse cardiac events occurred in 1 (2%) of 41 patients treated with paroxetine and 7 (18%) of 40 patients treated with nortriptyline (PϽ.03). Conclusions.-Paroxetine and nortriptyline are effective treatments for depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. Nortriptyline treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of serious adverse cardiac events compared with paroxetine.

No abstract

Aphis fabae gynoparae occurred in the same large proportion in simultaneous collections of all aphids alighting and probing on, and taking off from, a host plant (spindle) and a non-host (peach), and behaved similarly when approaching and leaving them in the same conditions. Most alighters took off again from leaves of both kinds within a few minutes, staying longer and probing more times on the host. In atmospheric conditions favouring local 'hovering' instead of dispersal, flying and alighting aphids became concentrated around host plants, not through any specific attraction to them, but apparently because more aphids had accumulated upon them and were now taking off.Brevicoryne brassicae occurred in the same large proportion in simultaneous collections of aphids alighting on a host plant (cabbage) and a non-host (sugar beet). No satisfactory evidence was found of preferential alightment on cabbage and there were indications of preferential alightment on the non-host. A very small minority of the A. fabae and B. brassicae that alighted on their hosts stayed there long enough to larviposit. This minority was rather larger among alighters late in the day, but in the absolute sense, more colonization occurred during earlier periods when more aphids arrived.The intensely dispersive type of host-finding behaviour in Myzus persicae, A. fabae and B. brassicae may be common among Aphididae. It seems ideal for the dissemination of non-persistent plant viruses, more particularly among the lessfavoured host plants of each aphid. The tendency to commensal association between virus and vector provides an ecological framework which may govern the incidence of virus-vector specificity and symbiosis.

ABSTRACT. The zigzagging behaviour of male Plodia interpunctella flying up a plume of sex pheromone was investigated in a horizontal wind tunnel by detailed analysis of the moths' ground tracks, groundspeeds, orientations and airspeeds. The moths ‘homed in’ on the source of the pheromone plume by progressively reducing airspeed and turning more into wind, thereby reducing groundspeed and the distance between track reversals and so narrowing down their zigzags (Fig. 16). Track angles and times between reversals were unaffected. Removing the wind‐borne pheromone plume while a moth was flying along it confirmed that zigzagging can be an anemotactic response to losing the scent rather than a chemotactic response to the plume. For the first 1–2 s after the moth entered pheromone‐free air the zigzagging was indistinguishable from that shown when the plume remained; thereafter it widened progressively until the moths were flying to and fro at c. 90° to the wind. The after‐effect of odour stimulation persisted for many zigs and zags and many seconds (Figs. 4 and 5). Moths flying along pheromone plumes compensated efficiently for differences of wind speed, showing similar distributions of track angles to wind, and of ground‐speeds, in winds of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ms‐1 (Figs. 12 and 13). Groundspeed varied with track angle to wind and this relationship was also similar in the three wind speeds (Fig. 14). This constancy of track angles and groundspeeds was due to the moths both increasing their airspeeds and turning more into wind at the higher wind speeds (Fig. 17). Thus the direction of the apparent movement of the ground pattern beneath the moths varied with wind speed. It is inferred that the moths, although unable to sense the wind directly, are able to compensate for changes in wind speed by integrating the wind‐dependent optomotor input with information about their own airspeed, or with information about their own turning movements. Maintaining some ‘preferred’ relationship between these inputs by adjustments of orientation and airspeed, would then serve to maintain a given combination of track angle and groundspeed independently of wind speed. The preferred relationship is repeatedly re‐set by the changing olfactory input from the pheromone plume, which also controls the switching between left and right of the upwind direction.

Achieving a node-negative status is the major determinant of outcome following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Histomorphologic tumor regression is less predictive of outcome than pathologic nodal status (ypN), and the need to include a primary site regression score in a new staging classification is unclear.

No abstract