Communications solution of NaHCO,, washed twice with H20. dried over MgSO, and evaporated. A total of 0.11 g (0.33 mmoles) of a white oil was obtained after flash chromathography (silica gel, hexane). Yield: 6%. ',C-NMR (CDCI,, ppm, TMS): 14.0, 22.6, 29.0, 29.1, 30.5. 31.7, 118.7, 124.8, 137.4, 143.9. 'H-NMR: (CDCI,, ppm, TMS): 0.88 (t. 6H), 1.30 (m, 12H), 1.60 (m. 4H), 2.55 (t, 4H), 6.73 (m, ZH), 6.96 (d, 2H. . I = I 4 Hz). i,,,, (CHCI,): 306 nm.Electropolymerization: All compounds were repeatedly chromatographed and used in a highly pure form ( > 99 % from 'H-NMR) for the electropolymerization. It should be stressed that if the compounds used for the electrosynthesis of the polymers were contaminated by even small amounts of another regioisomer, copolymers would result, owing to the fact that regioisomers have very similar oxidation potentials. The polymers from oligomers 11-V were grown by repeated cyclic voltammetric cycles (CVs) at 25 "C and SO mVs-in acetonitrile-0.S M LiCIO, using standard electrochemical equipment; the CVs were performed between 0 and 1.2 V vs. SCE for dimers and between 0 and 1.0 V for trimen. The concentration of the starting molecules in electrosynthesis solution was 1 x 10-M except for methyl-substituted 111. whose concentration was 1 x 10.' M. The polymers from compounds I were galvanostatically prepared at 5 mAcm-2 and 5°C i n nitrobenzene-0.02 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate -0.2 M monomer with 50 mCcm-2 polymerization charge. All the polymers were grown on TO (transparent conductive tin oxide electrode). All experimental details and the optical and electrochemical characterization will be published in a rorthcoming paper [14].