The biological activities of long and short forms of the prolactin receptor have been compared. These two receptors expressed in mammalian cells were shown to bind prolactin with equal high affinity. The ability of these different forms to transduce the hormonal message was estimated by their capacity to stimulate transcription by using the promoter of a milk protein gene fused to the chlormphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) coding sequence. Experiments were performed in serum-free conditions to avoid the effect oflactogenic factors present in serum. An 417-fold induction of CAT activity was obtained in the presence of prolactin when the long form of the prolactin receptor was expressed, whereas no induction was observed when the short form was expressed. The present results clearly establish that only the long form of the prolactin receptor is involved in milk protein gene transcription.
We have recently cloned a cDNA encoding a mutant form of PRL receptor (PRL-R) from Nb2 cells, a PRL-dependent T lymphocyte-derived cell line. This cDNA is identical to the long form of the rat PRL-R, except for a deletion of 594 base pairs in the cytoplasmic domain, resulting in a mature receptor protein of 393 amino acids. Although a segment containing three cytoplasmic regions of moderate to high amino acid sequence identity with members of the PRL/GH receptor family is missing in this receptor form, the region of highest (70%) identity is retained. In the following studies, a homologous functional assay was developed to test the activity of three forms of receptor with respect to their ability to transmit a lactogenic signal. In this system, CHO cells were transiently transfected with a construct containing 2300 base pairs of the 5'-flanking sequence of the rat beta-casein gene fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene and an expression vector containing the various forms of rat PRL-R cDNA. The transfected cells were grown in serum-free medium in the absence or presence of PRL. In cells transfected with the long form of the PRL-R and beta-casein/CAT construct, a 7.2- +/- 0.9-fold induction (n = 3) of CAT activity was seen when cells were cultured in the presence of 400 ng/ml PRL and 1 micrograms/ml hydrocortisone. This level of stimulation was similar to that observed for the ovine beta-lactoglobulin/CAT construct in which a 5.7- +/- 1.2-fold (n = 3) effect was found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The mechanism of transduction of the PRL signal in target cells is poorly understood. We examined the effects of PRL on the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration in Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing functional PRL receptors. [Ca2+]i was determined by dual emission microspectrofluorimetry using indo-1 as the Ca2+ fluorescent probe. We demonstrate that at physiological concentrations (0.5-5 nM), PRL stimulates Ca2+ entry (type I) and/or induces a mobilization of calcium ions stored in intracellular compartments (type II). Two types of Ca2+ mobilization, distinguishable by their onset kinetics, were observed, a slow mobilization (type IIa; transition time to peak, approximately 10 sec) and a fast mobilization (type IIb; transition time to peak, < 2 sec). PRL responses were delayed (15-120 sec) compared to the well known activation by phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate hydrolysis-coupled receptors. This suggests that inositol trisphosphate is not involved in PRL response or that phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate hydrolysis is not directly coupled to the PRL receptor. The amplitude of the PRL-induced Ca2+ increases (300-1400 nM) would be sufficient to provoke several physiological responses, such as stimulation of secretion, cell proliferation, or gene activation. However, the relation between the increase in Ca2+ and activation of milk protein genes remains to be established.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.