Both political scientists and development practitioners express renewed interest in the 'local' in peacebuilding, and a need to better engage with local communities' concerns, perspectives and capacities. Developing scholarship highlights how such discourses essentialise the 'local', and obscure the role of interveners in its construction. This paper argues that thinking in terms of 'local' peacebuilding configures particular understandings of what conflict and peacebuilding entail. It depicts local conflict as something that can be addressed in isolation, and neutralises local peacebuilding agendas. Experiences of community-based peacebuilding in Burundi and eastern DR Congo instead show 'local' peacebuilders' pragmatic efforts to move beyond 'local' conflict, and significant local contestation about the kinds of peace, justice and social transformation envisaged. The paper concludes that a concern with the 'local' in peacebuilding may make interveners gloss over important contributions of so-called 'local' stakeholders to structural peace and state-formation, and so effectively disempower them.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.