Background:The survival outcome for primary cardiac malignant tumors (PMCTs) based on race has yet to be fully elucidated in previously published literature. This study aimed to address the general long-term outcome and survival rate differences in PMCTs among African Americans and Caucasian populations.
Methods:The 18 cancer registries database from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program from 1975 to 2016 were utilized. Ninety-four African American (AA) and 647 Caucasian (CAU) patients from the SEER registry were available for survival analysis. The log-rank test was used to compare the difference in mortality between two populations and presented by the Kaplan-Meier curves. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the independent predictors of all-cause mortality.
Results:The overall 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival rates were 74%, 44.3%, and 16.6%, respectively, with a median survival of 10 months. There was no significant difference in survival rate between the two races (p-value = 0.55). The 1-year survival rate improved significantly during the study timeline in the AA
Aim
The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic importance of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with moderate–severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) receiving MitraClip procedure. RVD and TR grade are associated with cardiovascular mortality in the general population and other cardiovascular diseases. However, there are limited data from observational studies on the prognostic significance of RVD and TR in FMR receiving MitraClip procedure.
Methods and results
A systemic review and meta‐analysis were performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase to assess the prognostic value of RVD and TR grade for mortality in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) receiving MitraClip procedure. Hazard ratios were extracted from multivariate models reporting on the association of RVD and TR with mortality and described as pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals. A total of eight non‐randomized studies met the inclusion criteria with seven studies having at least 12 months follow‐up with a mean follow‐up of 20.9 months. Among the aforementioned studies, a total of 1112 patients (71.5% being male) were eligible for being included in our meta‐analysis with an overall mortality rate of 28.4% (n = 316). Of the enrolled patients, RVD was present in 46.1% and moderate–severe TR in 29.2%. RVD was significantly associated with mortality compared to normal RV function (HR, 1.79, 95% CI, 1.39–2.31, P < 0.001, I2 = 0). Patients with moderate–severe TR showed increased risk of mortality compared with those in the none‐mild TR group (HR, 1.61. 95% CI, 1.11–2.33, P = 0.01, I2 = 14).
Conclusions
This meta‐analysis demonstrates the prognostic importance of RVD and TR grade in predicting all‐cause mortality in patients with significant FMR. RV function and TR parameters may therefore be useful in the risk stratification of patients with significant FMR undergoing MitraClip procedure.
Exam wrappers are exercises where students evaluate their exam performance, reflect on their study habits, and make plans for how to improve. There have been few randomized control studies of the effectiveness of exam wrappers, and existing studies often have small samples. We used a randomized experimental design to assess the effectiveness of an exam wrapper in a large introductory psychology course. Students were randomly assigned to either the study habits condition (N = 153) or the healthy habits condition (N = 163). About a week before the second exam, students in the study habits condition wrote about study habits they wanted to maintain and change, and a specific plan for how they would do this. Additionally, these students wrote about a potential obstacle to their plan and created implementation intentions to help them overcome the obstacle. Students in the healthy habits condition completed a similar exercise focused on healthy habits. All students completed postexam reflection surveys where they answered questions about both their study habits and health habits. We found no evidence of a difference in exam scores between the study habits and healthy habits conditions. However, students in the study habits condition spent somewhat more time using effective study strategies and less time distracted. We discuss implications for interventions targeting students' study habits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.