No abstract

304 Background: G (30-minute infusion) plus E improves survival in patients with APC compared with G alone. In a recent phase III trial, G-FDR showed a trend to better OS compared with standard G (6.2 vs. 4.9 months, HR 0.83, p=0.04), although the study was underpowered to detect great difference in OS. Based on our previous experience with G-FDR, we decided to evaluate the combination of G-FDR plus E, after E approval for APC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated pathologically confirmed APC, locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic (MPC), and ECOG PS 0-2 were included. G 1500 mg/m2 was given by 150-min infusion (10 mg/m2/min) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days combined with E 100 mg/day orally. Treatment modifications for G-FDR were planned according with previously Tempero's phase II trial, and as described in prescribing information for E. Results: 62 pts were included (36M/26F), with a median age of 63 y-o (range 37-78). ECOG PS 0/1/2: 19/40/3. LAPC/MPC: 16/46. All except one had measurable disease. ORR was 13% (8 PR), 95% CI: 4.7-21.3, and there were 34 (55%) SD. Mean relative dose intensity for G was 0.76 and 0.90 for E. Main hematologic toxicities 3/4 per pt: anaemia 12/0, thrombocytopenia 7/4, neutropenia 18/7. Acneiform rash 1/2/3 occurred in 16/16/3 pts. Other relevant adverse events were (grade 2/3/4): diarrhoea 18/3/0, mucositis 5/1/0, infection 9/8/1, thrombosis 1/4/1 and vomiting 6/4/0. There were three treatment-related deaths (septic shock, cholangitis, and bilateral pulmonary embolism). Ten pts (all LAPC) received RT after ≤ 6 cycles, all with concomitant capecitabine 825 mg/m2 bid. In 4 pts salvage surgery were performed: 2 R0, 1 R1 and 1 R2. Median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3-6.7), 7.9 m for LAPC and 2.5 m for MPC (p = 0.004). Median OS was 10 months (95% CI: 7.1-12.9), 17.5 m for LAPC and 7 m for MPC (p = 0.019). OS was significantly shorter in males (p = 0.01) and in pts taking major opioids (p = 0.027). There was a trend to better OS in pts who developed skin rash grade ≥ 2 (p = 0.078). Conclusions: In this noncomparative study, G-FDR plus E is a feasible regimen in APC with an acceptable toxicity and notable activity. G-FDR seems to increase hematologic toxicity compared with standard infusion. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

No abstract

Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent the most frequent mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Less than 5% of them seem to be hereditary, being succinate dehydrogenase complex ( SDHx ) deficient disorders and neurofibromatosis type 1 the more related inherited conditions. Wild type (WT) KIT and PDGFRα GISTs constitute a clue for a hypothetical underlying germline condition. Case presentation We present a case of a 20 years old female diagnosed of a gastric WT GIST who developed hepatic metastases during her clinical course. No significant or typical phenotypic features suggestive of a specific syndrome were detected by physical examination. Also, her family history seemed to be irrelevant, since no other cases of GISTs, paragangliomas or pheochromocytomas were reported. Her paternal grandfather died as a consequence of a pituitary adenoma. In light of the age of tumor presentation and somatic features of gastric GIST, we performed genetic testing of SDHx genes. Analysis obtained from peripheral blood sample revealed the presence, in heterozygous state, of the c.1A > C; p.(Met1?) pathogenic variant in the SDHA . Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published report in which the c.1A > C; p.(Met1?) pathogenic variant in the SDHA is associated with a GIST. SDHA pathogenic variants increase the risk of paraganglioma, pheochromocytoma, GIST, pituitary adenoma and renal cancer in an autosomal dominant inherited condition named paraganglioma syndrome type 5. The absence of family history of tumors in SDHA pathogenic variants carriers could be related to its low penetrance. All patients diagnosed with WT GISTs should be referred to a hereditary cancer genetic counseling unit regardless of the age at presentation or the absence of a suspicious family history.

The schedule of cisplatin and gemcitabine analyzed is active with a good therapeutic index.