These results indicate that SI is a prognostic marker for CRC that is independent of stage-related variables in patients who have undergone potentially curative resections.
We tested whether nuclear imaging with indium111 (111In)-labeled murine monoclonal (MoAb) anticarcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) ZCE-025 antibody could detect recurrent disease in patients with a rising serum CEA level but negative findings for computed tomographic (CT) scans of the abdomen and pelvis, chest radiograph, and colonoscopy or barium enema. Twenty patients with a history of completely resected CEA-producing adenocarcinoma (18 with colon cancer, one with breast cancer, and one with Hodgkin's disease) and a rising serum CEA level were given an intravenous infusion of 2 mg of 111In-labeled ZCE-025 mixed with 38 mg of unlabeled ZCE-025. Planar and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) scans were acquired at 72 and 144 hours, and in 19 of the 20 patients these were positive. Of those 19, 13 underwent exploratory surgery, and cancer was found in 10, and two had a diagnostic biopsy, which confirmed cancer. Three patients who had negative laparotomies and all four patients who did not undergo surgery or biopsy were followed radiologically. In all seven, cancer was subsequently detected at the sites suggested by the ZCE-025 scan. Thus, tumor was confirmed in all 19 patients with positive scans. Five of 13 patients who were explored benefited from the study and the exploratory laparotomy, as disease was entirely resected in four or was subjected to definitive radiation therapy to the pelvis in the fifth. In two additional patients who were not explored, MoAb imaging resulted in definitive therapy to regionally confined recurrent disease. 111In-labeled anti-CEA MoAb ZCE-025 scanning in patients with rising CEA successfully imaged metastatic colorectal cancer that eluded detection by other methods and affected the care given to some. These results suggest an important role for 111In-labeled ZCE-025 scanning among patients with rising CEA and otherwise occult metastatic cancer.
New highly-multiplexed imaging technologies have enabled the study of tissues in unprecedented detail. These methods are increasingly being applied to understand how cancer cells and immune response change during tumor development, progression, and metastasis, as well as following treatment. Yet, existing analysis approaches focus on investigating small tissue samples on a per-cell basis, not taking into account the spatial proximity of cells, which indicates cell-cell interaction and specific biological processes in the larger cancer microenvironment. We present Visinity, a scalable visual analytics system to analyze cell interaction patterns across cohorts of whole-slide multiplexed tissue images. Our approach is based on a fast regional neighborhood computation, leveraging unsupervised learning to quantify, compare, and group cells by their surrounding cellular neighborhood. These neighborhoods can be visually analyzed in an exploratory and confirmatory workflow. Users can explore spatial patterns present across tissues through a scalable image viewer and coordinated views highlighting the neighborhood composition and spatial arrangements of cells. To verify or refine existing hypotheses, users can query for specific patterns to determine their presence and statistical significance. Findings can be interactively annotated, ranked, and compared in the form of small multiples. In two case studies with biomedical experts, we demonstrate that Visinity can identify common biological processes within a human tonsil and uncover novel white-blood cell networks and immune-tumor interactions.
Thirteen consecutive patients with inflammatory breast cancer were treated with a regimen consisting of cyclic chemotherapy, extended simple mastectomy, and immunotherapy utilizing irradiated allogeneic breast cancer cells admixed with BCG. When surgery was performed after two or more cycles o f 5-U, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cyclophosphamide, there was complete eradication of detectable tumor in three of 11 operative specimens. Two patients had surgery prior to our evaluation and four had prior chemotherapy. Chest wall radiation was initiated after 8-10+ months of chemotherapy at the doxo-rubicin cardiotoxicity limits. Seven untreated patients, all premenopausal, were compared to our previous series which employed either irradiation after several courses of chemotherapy or irradiation alone." The current series has two relapses (eight months, 25 months) at a median follow-up time of 21 months (range, 8-26 months). In the previous chemoradiotherapy trial, all nine premenopausal patients had relapsed within 25 months, with a median disease free interval of 17 months. In the trial using radiotherapy alone, all ten patients had relapsed by 19 months (median disease free interval, nine months). The present regimen appears to improve control of the disease and further investigation of both surgery and im-munotherapy intercalated with cyclic chemotherapy appears warranted in this disease. Cancer 49:1266-1271, 1982. NFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER is an uncommon dis-I ease with very poor prognosis. In the past, few series have cited median survivals of greater than 24 months, and five-year survival has been seen in only a small number of patients.'-4 It is widely held that the ominous prognosis relates to the presence of systemic metastasis at pre~entation.~.' Surgery has been considered to be useless and potentially harmfuL3 Radiation therapy has a role in establishing local control, but regional recurrence still occurs in at least 25% to 50% of the case^.^.^ The current study reevaluates the role of surgery in inflammatory breast cancer. With the development of effective chemotherapeutic
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.