Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0003356100041684How to cite this article: T. P. A. Geuyen, J. M. F. Verhagen and M. W. A. Verstegen (1984). Effect of housing and temperature on metabolic rate of pregnant sows.
ABSTRACTTwelve pregnant sows, 35 to 52 days pregnant initially and 89 to 103 days pregnant at the end of the experiment, were used to study the effect of ambient temperature on metabolic rate. Six sows were group-housed in two groups of three sows per group in one calorimeter and six sows were tethered individually in another calorimeter. Temperatures were changed by 3 C C every 3 days in a stepwise fashion from 20 to 8°C and from 8 to 20°C. Sows were given a constant amount of food, which gave 540 kJ metabolic energy per kg live weight 075 per day and which covered estimated needs that were proportionately 0-20 above maintenance.Average daily live-weight gain was 531 g for the group-housed sows and 402 g for those housed individually. Heat loss increased below 14°C in group-housed and below 20°C in individually-housed sows. Extra daily thermoregulatory demand was 7-5 kJ/°C in group-and 13-7 kJ/°C in individually-housed sows.
Group-housed young growing pigs, given food ad libitum, were exposed to two temperatures, one within thermal neutrality (25°C) and one around the lower critical temperature (15°C). Pigs at 15°C had daily gains reduced by 57 g for 6 days after initial exposure. Food intake was increased significantly after 6 days at 15°C but not at 25°C. Maintenance requirement was increased by 58 kJ/kg M" 75 and energy retained as protein was decreased by 49 kJ/kg M°7 5 for the first 6 days after exposure to the treatment of 15°C and thereafter both became equivalent to those of pigs at 25°C afterwards. It is concluded that animals were acclimatized after 6 days exposure.
Two experiments were performed to study the effect of ambient temperature and feeding level on energy and protein metabolism of individually housed pregnant sows. In experiment 1, 12 pregnant animals were used. The stage of pregnancy at the start of the experiment ranged from 34 to 41 days. In experiment 2, 10 pregnant animals were used. The stage of pregnancy at the start of the experiment ranged from 38 to 47 days. In each experiment two groups of animals were used. Each group of five or six animals was individually tethered in one of two identical calorimeters and given one of two feeding levels. At the high feeding level the animals received about 1·35 × maintenance. At the low feeding level the animals received about 1·1 × maintenance. The temperature in experiment 1 changed stepwise in both calorimeters by 3°C every 5 to 7 days from 21 to 12°C and then in reverse order. Temperature in experiment 2 changed stepwise in both calorimeters by 2°C every 3·5 days from 25°C to 11°C and then in reverse order.Energy gain was negative in animals at the low feeding level at the temperatures below 15 to 18°C. At the high feeding level sows lost energy at 12°C or lower in experiment 2. Protein gain was depressed by both low feeding level and low temperatures. Energy balance was depressed by about 90 kJ/kg M0·75 per day at the lower feeding level and by 19 kJ/kg M0·75 per day per °C below thermoneutrality. Protein gain was depressed by about 26 g/day at the low feeding level and by about 6 g/day per °C below thermoneutrality. Fat gain at low feeding level was depressed by about 92 g/day and by about 154 g/day at the lowest temperature. At low feeding level below the critical temperature, gain of fat was negative. Feeding levels used in these experiments did not supply sufficient energy for energy equilibrium or fat gain for the pregnant sow kept for longer periods below the thermoneutral zone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.